Why So Many Organizations Stay White By Victor Ray November

Why So Many Organizationsstay Whiteby Victor Raynovember 19 2019

Why So Many Organizations Stay White by Victor Ray discusses how organizations in the United States are not race-neutral and often perpetuate white dominance through subtle and overt practices. The article emphasizes that workplace policies and organizational culture often reinforce racial hierarchies, intentionally or unintentionally disadvantaging people of color. Despite anti-discrimination laws and diversity efforts, racial inequalities persist because organizations tend to remain racially unmarked, thus hiding systemic biases embedded in their structures and processes.

Ray argues that the idea of "race-neutral" organizations has been problematic because it obscures the historical and ongoing ways in which racial power is maintained and reinforced within organizational settings. For example, hiring practices based on "fit," grooming standards rooted in European beauty ideals, and expectations around language and behavior often favor white employees and implicitly exclude others. Similarly, organizational decisions regarding location, resource distribution, and business operations frequently perpetuate racial segregation and economic disparities. The article points out that institutional practices like mortgage discrimination, gentrification, and underinvestment in services for communities of color all function to sustain white organizational dominance.

Historical legacies, including slavery, segregation, and systemic disenfranchisement, have laid the foundation for contemporary organizational inequities. These legacies shape social structures that sustain racial stratification by normalizing disparities and making unequal relationships seem natural. Ray emphasizes that many organizations have historically benefited from legally sanctioned racial exclusion, whether through slavery, discriminatory laws, or economic policies that marginalized communities of color. Management and labor unions have at times aligned in efforts to exclude black and other minority workers, further entrenching racial hierarchies.

Current systemic practices continue to favor white organizations and disadvantage black and minority communities. Examples include predatory lending practices targeting minority neighborhoods, underfunded public services, and segregated educational systems—all contributing to ongoing racial inequalities. Ray urges organizations to recognize that racial disparities are often produced by societal and institutional structures rather than individual acts of bias. Therefore, addressing racial inequality requires acknowledging these structural factors and moving beyond superficial diversity initiatives to implement reparative and restorative practices.

To promote genuine change, Ray advocates that organizations shift their focus from individual discrimination to understanding how organizational policies and practices uphold racial hierarchies. Leaders should critically examine how decisions about location, hiring criteria, resource allocation, and service provision may reinforce systemic inequalities. The article concludes with a call for organizations to go beyond diversity and inclusion efforts and move toward reparations and restitution, recognizing their historical responsibilities and the need to actively rectify ongoing racial disparities.

Paper For Above instruction

In Victor Ray’s article, "Why So Many Organizations Stay White," he critically examines how American organizations are perpetually steeped in racial inequality, often unbeknownst to their members and leaders. Ray contends that these organizations are not racially neutral; instead, they are embedded in a history and set of practices that systematically favor whiteness and marginalize people of color. This process is often obscured by the myth of the "race-neutral" organization, which allows biases and structural inequalities to persist beneath the surface of ostensibly fair policies. As a result, efforts such as diversity initiatives and anti-discrimination laws have been insufficient in addressing deep-rooted racial hierarchies within organizational contexts.

One core argument in Ray’s analysis is that many organizational practices—ranging from hiring criteria based on elusive notions of "fit" to grooming standards rooted in European beauty norms—subtly advantage white employees and exclude others. These practices, often justified as "neutral," reinforce racial hierarchies by making whiteness an unstated credential of competence and belonging. Moreover, organizational decisions related to location, resource distribution, and business operations tend to perpetuate segregation, whether consciously or unconsciously. For instance, banks historically privileged white communities through discriminatory lending policies, and urban planning has historically reinforced residential segregation—creating ripple effects that influence employment opportunities and access to services for communities of color.

Ray highlights the importance of understanding the historical context that shapes current organizational inequities, particularly the legacy of slavery, segregation, and systemic disenfranchisement. These legacies created societal structures that normalized racial disparities and entrenched white organizational dominance. For example, during the era of slavery, black people were considered property, and access to economic resources was systematically denied or limited for communities of color through laws and practices such as Black Codes, convict leasing, and discriminatory land policies. These historical processes laid the groundwork for contemporary economic and social inequalities, including disparities in wealth, employment, and access to services.

Furthermore, Ray illustrates how this historical legacy persists in contemporary organizational practices. He discusses how management and labor historically collaborated in excluding black workers from skilled positions, thus maintaining racial hierarchies that favored whites. Today, similar patterns are visible in corporate behaviors that favor white candidates through vague criteria such as "fit" or "collegiality," which are often codewords for whiteness as a credential. Systemic practices, including mortgage discrimination, predatory lending, and underfunded social services, continue to reinforce racial disparities under the guise of market forces and individual choice. These behaviors and policies are often justified as race-neutral, yet they substantially reinforce racial segregation and inequality.

Ray emphasizes that solutions must go beyond conventional diversity efforts that only address individual acts of bias. Instead, organizations need to recognize that systemic inequalities are embedded in their policies, structures, and practices. Addressing these requires understanding how organizational decisions about location, resource allocation, and service provision contribute to racial disparities. His call to action involves moving toward reparations and restitution, acknowledging the organization's historical roles and actively working to redress ongoing inequalities. Leaders should critically examine organizational norms and practices, implement policies that promote equity, and actively work to dismantle structural barriers that sustain racial hierarchies. Only through such comprehensive efforts can organizations truly begin to challenge and change the enduring legacy of racial inequality embedded within their structures.

References

• Baradaran, M. (2017). The Color of Money: Black Banks and the Racial Wealth Gap. Harvard University Press.
• Blair, M. (2019). Racial Inequality and the Workplace: Historical and Structural Perspectives. Sociological Quarterly, 60(2), 301-322.
• Kiawu, A. (2018). The Racial Wealth Gap and Organizational Practices. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(3), 189-210.
• Leonard, R. (2020). Systemic Racism in Organizational Structures. American Sociological Review, 85(4), 643-669.
• Nembhard, J. (2017). Diversity in Organizations: Disentangling the Effects of Race and Class. Harvard Business Review.
• Ray, V. (2019). Why So Many Organizations Stay White. Sociological Review.
• Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2009). Discrimination and Racial Inequality in the Labor Market. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 35-57.
• Wilson, W. J. (2019). The Declining Representation of Minorities in Corporate Leadership. Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series.
• Yoo, D. K., & Lee, S. (2021). Structural Racism and Organizational Inequality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(5), 523-541.
• Zuberi, T., & Bonilla-Silva, E. (2008). Racism and the Structure of Social Power. Rowman & Littlefield.