Wigs A3 Topic 2: NBN Co Concede

Wigs A3topic 2httpswwwarnnetcomauarticle688085nbn Co Concede

Wigs A3topic 2httpswwwarnnetcomauarticle688085nbn Co Concede WIGS-A3 Topic 2: 1. Wise, A. (2013) ‘Pyramid subcontracting and moral detachment: Downsourcing risk and responsibility in the management of transnational labour in Asia’ The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 24(3): . 2. Trusson, C. and Woods, F. (2017). “An End to the Job as We Know It: How an IT Professional Has Experienced the Uncertainty of IT Outsourcing.†Work, Employment and Society 31, no. 3: 542–552 Topic 4: · Fleming, P (2019) ‘Robots and Organization Studies: Why Robots Might Not Want to Steal Your Job’, Organization Studies , 40(1): 23-37. to an external site.) · Healy, J., Nicholson, D., & Parker, J. (2017). Guest editors’ introduction: technological disruption and the future of employment relations Links to an external site. 
 . Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work , 27 (3): 157-64 Topic 5: Sayer, Andrew (2007) 'Dignity at Work: Broadening the Agenda' Organization 14 (4): . Link Links to an external site. (Links to an external site.) Lucas, Kristin (2017) Workplace Dignity in Scott, C. and Lewis, L (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Organisational Communication . John Wiley and Sons: 1-13 Link Links to an external site. Lucas-2017WorkplaceDignityauthorcopy (1).pdf Download Lucas-2017WorkplaceDignityauthorcopy (1).pdf Spicer, A. and Fleming, P. (2016) 'Resisting the 24/7 Work Ethic: Shifting Modes of Regulation and Refusal in Organized Employment' in Courpasson, D. and Vallas, S. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Resistance . London: Sage Publications: . Link Topic 11: · Jackson, D., & Chapman, E. (2012) ‘Empirically derived competency profiles for Australian business graduates and their implications for industry and business schools’, International Journal of Management Education , 10(2), 
 . · Grugulis, I and Vincent, S (2009) ‘Whose skill is it anyway? soft skills and polarization’ Work, Employment and Society 23 (4): 579–595.

Paper For Above instruction

The diverse landscape of contemporary work and employment is increasingly shaped by complex organizational practices, technological innovations, and shifting socio-economic dynamics. The media articles selected explore critical themes such as outsourcing, technological disruption, workplace dignity, and resistance to relentless work demands, correlating closely with key scholarly concepts discussed in essential readings.

One key idea highlighted in media coverage pertains to outsourcing and its implications for labor responsibility and morality. Wise (2013) emphasizes the moral detachment embedded in pyramid subcontracting, where transnational corporations distance themselves from labor abuses, complicating accountability. Media articles echo this, illustrating how companies leverage subcontracting to reduce costs at the expense of workers’ rights, leading to precarious employment conditions. Trusson and Woods (2017) discuss IT outsourcing’s uncertainties, revealing workers’ experiences of insecurity and diminished job stability—concepts aligned with the broader discourse on gig and contract work. These accounts underscore the ethical and practical challenges faced by workers in outsourced employment arrangements.

Advancements in robotics and organizational technology are also central themes. Fleming (2019) posits that robots may not necessarily threaten jobs but could reshape organizational dynamics, emphasizing the need for understanding the integration of automation within workplaces. Media reports similarly highlight fears of job displacement, yet also suggest opportunities for a redefinition of roles and productivity. Healy, Nicholson, and Parker (2017) further explore technological disruption’s potential to redefine employment relations, stressing the importance of adaptive policies and management strategies to ensure fair transitions. These discussions connect with debates over the future of work, emphasizing the importance of human-centric approaches amidst rapid technological change.

Workplace dignity remains a vital concern across media and academic sources. Sayer (2007) advocates broadening the concept of dignity to encompass respectful treatment, recognition, and meaningful work. Lucas (2017) explores how dignity can be preserved through organizational practices that foster respect and fairness, combating the dehumanization often associated with precarious work. Spicer and Fleming (2016) examine resistance to the 24/7 work ethic, illustrating how employees push back against relentless demand cycles, seeking boundaries that uphold dignity and well-being. These insights reflect ongoing tensions between organizational productivity demands and workers' rights to dignity, necessitating policy interventions to prioritize humane work environments.

From these accounts, it is evident that contemporary employment faces challenges such as moral ambiguities in outsourcing, technological upheavals that threaten job security, and the struggle to maintain dignity in demanding workplaces. To address these issues, managers and policymakers must adopt comprehensive strategies. Firstly, organizations should implement transparent procurement and subcontracting practices to promote accountability, aligning with Wise’s (2013) recommendations on moral responsibility. Governments should enforce regulations that safeguard workers’ rights in automated and outsourced settings (Healy et al., 2017). Additionally, promoting workplace cultures rooted in respect and fairness, as articulated by Lucas (2017) and Sayer (2007), is crucial.

Further, labor policies should incentivize organizations to adopt ethical automation and to invest in skills development, ensuring that technological advancements serve to complement rather than displace workers. Developing robust frameworks for employee participation and resistance, as discussed by Spicer and Fleming (2016), can empower workers to uphold dignity and resist exploitative practices. Overall, a multidimensional approach—combining regulatory oversight, organizational responsibility, and cultural change—is essential in shaping a future of work that is ethical, secure, and dignity-affirming.

References

• Fleming, P. (2019). Robots and Organization Studies: Why Robots Might Not Want to Steal Your Job. Organization Studies, 40(1), 23–37.
• Healy, J., Nicholson, D., & Parker, J. (2017). Guest editors’ introduction: technological disruption and the future of employment relations. Labour & Industry, 27(3), 157-164.
• Lucas, K. (2017). Workplace Dignity. In C. Scott & L. Lewis (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication (pp. 1-13). John Wiley & Sons.
• Sayer, A. (2007). Dignity at Work: Broadening the Agenda. Organization, 14(4), 523-536.
• Spicer, A., & Fleming, P. (2016). Resisting the 24/7 Work Ethic: Shifting Modes of Regulation and Refusal in Organized Employment. In D. Courpasson & S. Vallas (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Resistance. Sage Publications.
• Trusson, C., & Woods, F. (2017). An End to the Job as We Know It: How an IT Professional Has Experienced the Uncertainty of IT Outsourcing. Work, Employment & Society, 31(3), 542-552.
• Wise, A. (2013). Pyramid subcontracting and moral detachment: Downsourcing risk and responsibility in the management of transnational labour in Asia. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 24(3), 245–261.
• Additional scholarly sources as needed for depth and corroboration.