Will Provide Username And Password For Access

L Will Provide A Username And Password For Accesshere Is Some Informat

L will provide a username and password for access. The final exam is worth 250 points and consists of eight essay questions—six at 30 points each and two at 35 points each. Students should plan to write at least three paragraphs per question; brief answers will not receive full consideration. The exam is one page and covers all Course TCOs and material from Weeks 1-7. Students have 3 hours and 30 minutes to complete the exam. Short answer and essay questions are not included in the eCollege auto-grading; students must submit the exam upon completion. It is advised to save work frequently to prevent data loss when time runs out, as the system will automatically log out after the allotted time. Students should note the Help Desk phone number for technical issues. Maintaining academic integrity is essential; violations may result in sanctions per the Student Handbook. By starting the exam, students confirm they are the sole participants, will not copy the exam, will refrain from discussion, and will adhere to integrity policies.

Paper For Above instruction

The final examination process in higher education serves as a comprehensive assessment of students’ mastery of course content, critical thinking abilities, and their capacity to synthesize knowledge across various topics. Specifically, in this course, the final exam comprises eight essay questions, emphasizing depth of understanding and analytical writing. This format necessitates careful preparation and strategic time management to effectively showcase learning accomplishments within the limited timeframe.

The structure of the exam, with six questions valued at 30 points and two questions at 35 points each, underscores the importance of nuanced and detailed responses, four or more paragraphs per question, to ensure full point attainment. Short, superficial answers risk incomplete comprehension and inadequate demonstration of critical thinking skills. Engaging deeply with each question involves not only recalling facts but also connecting concepts, offering reasoned arguments, and providing evidence-based insights. This approach aligns with Bloom’s Taxonomy, fostering higher-order thinking skills such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation that are crucial for academic success and intellectual development.

Exam coverage spans all Technical and Competency Objectives (TCOs) of the course and material from Weeks 1 through 7. This comprehensive scope requires students to review the entire curriculum and identify key themes, concepts, and skills learned throughout the course. Such breadth ensures that students can demonstrate an integrated understanding of the subject matter, applying foundational principles to complex scenarios and real-world problems.

Time management is a vital component of successfully completing the exam. With 3 hours and 30 minutes allocated, students should allocate time proportionally across questions, allowing for planning, outlining, writing, and reviewing responses. It is crucial to save progress frequently to prevent data loss caused by technical issues or time expiration, as the exam system will automatically log out students when time runs out. Preparation should also include familiarity with the exam platform and technical support resources, such as the Help Desk contact information.

The academic integrity policies outlined by DeVry University and the Keller Graduate School of Management serve as foundational ethical standards that uphold the credibility and value of the educational experience. Violations—such as copying, unauthorized assistance, or discussing exam content—are considered serious infractions and may lead to disciplinary action, including academic sanctions or expulsion. Students are expected to certify, upon starting the exam, that they are the sole participant, will not misuse the exam materials, and will adhere to all established integrity policies.

In conclusion, the final exam is a critical component of the course, designed to assess students’ comprehensive understanding and ability to communicate complex ideas effectively. Success hinges on thorough review of course materials, strategic time management, academic honesty, and clear, well-structured responses that demonstrate higher-level thinking. This approach not only aims to maximize performance but also reinforces the broader educational goals of developing thoughtful, ethical, and competent graduates ready for professional challenges.

References

• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
• McKeachie, W. J. (2002). McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers (12th ed.). Houghton Mifflin.
• Nilson, L. B. (2016). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors. Anker Publishing.
• Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.
• Race, P. (2014). Making learning happen: A guide for post-compulsory education. Sage Publications.
• Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52-59.
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). ASCD.
• Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2008). The first-year experience: Are we still expecting too much? Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 3, 19-28.