Willing To Pay $25–$30 If Completed Within 4 Hours

Willing To Pay 2530 If Completed Within The Next 4 Hours If Done

Willing to pay $25/30 if completed within the next 4 hours. -If done by hours), then $20. This assignment consists of two (2) parts: a project schedule, and a written response. You must submit both parts as separate files for the completion of this assignment. Label each file name according to the part of the assignment it is written for.

Part A: Project Schedule (Submit as one [1] Microsoft Project file) Create a multilevel work breakdown structure (WBS) and detailed project schedule based upon the information from Appendix 13.2.

Part B: Written Response (Submit as a Microsoft Word file) Write a one to two (1-2) page response in which you: Summarize the project’s performance in terms of schedule and costs. Recommend corrective actions (at least two [2] total) to improve the project’s performance. Give your opinion on what you foresee as the greatest risk to the project.

Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements: Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.

Paper For Above instruction

The task requires the creation of a comprehensive project planning and analysis document, comprising two main parts: a detailed project schedule and a critical written response. The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate proficiency in project scheduling techniques, specifically the development of a work breakdown structure (WBS) and a detailed schedule, alongside the ability to analyze project performance and recommend improvements based on schedule and cost considerations. Additionally, it involves assessing project risks to forecast potential challenges.

Part A: Developing the Project Schedule

The first part entails constructing a project schedule using Microsoft Project. The schedule must be built upon the information provided in Appendix 13.2, which presumably contains project activities, durations, dependencies, and milestones. The core activity involves creating a multilevel Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) that organizes project deliverables into manageable sections. This structure allows for detailed scheduling of tasks, resource allocations, and timeline management.

The WBS should be hierarchically structured, starting from major deliverables down to specific work packages. Once the hierarchy is established, each activity needs to be scheduled with realistic durations, dependencies identified, and milestones set to monitor project progress effectively. The final deliverable for this part is a comprehensive Microsoft Project file that visually represents the schedule with Gantt charts, task links, and resource allocations if available.

Part B: Written Project Performance Analysis

The second part demands a critical narrative of the project’s current status based on schedule and costs. This involves analyzing key performance indicators, such as schedule variance (SV), cost variance (CV), and the overall schedule performance index (SPI) and cost performance index (CPI). The analysis should reflect whether the project is on track, ahead, or behind schedule and within or over budget.

Building on this analysis, the report should include at least two recommended corrective actions. These could involve reallocating resources, adjusting schedules, accelerating certain activities, or implementing tighter control measures to mitigate delays and cost overruns.

Finally, the response must include an informed outlook on the project’s greatest risk. This could involve technical challenges, resource shortages, scope creep, or external factors such as supply chain disruptions. The opinion should be substantiated with project management principles and, where applicable, references to literature or industry standards.

Formatting and Submission Guidelines

The oral assignment must be formatted with double spacing, Times New Roman font size 12, and one-inch margins. A cover page with the assignment title, your name, course details, professor’s name, and submission date should precede the main content. The cover page does not count toward the page limit. Both the project schedule and the written report should be submitted as separate files, clearly labeled per part.

In conclusion, this assignment assesses your ability to plan, analyze, and improve project performance through technical scheduling tools and critical evaluation. Success in this task demonstrates mastery of core project management competencies, including scheduling, performance measurement, and risk assessment.

References

• PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition. Project Management Institute.
• Kerzner, H. (2013). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• Heldman, K. (2018). PMP: Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide. Sybex.
• Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2018). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Garcia, R. (2020). Risk Management in Projects. Journal of Project Management, 41(3), 112-124.
• Morris, P. W. G. (2013). The Management of Projects. Thomas Telford Publishing.
• Thomas, J., & Mengel, T. (2017). Preparing for Project Management Certification. CRC Press.
• Project Management Institute. (2021). Practice Standard for Work Breakdown Structures. PMI.
• Milosevic, D. Z. (2014). Project Management with CPM, PERT, and Precedence Programming. Wiley.