Wired And Wireless LAN Bandwidth And Performance Requirement

1c Wired And Wireless Lan Bandwidth And Performance Requirementsexpla

Explain how your LAN/LANs perform with respect to tolerable delay, network load at various times, and cost. For example, applications that contain multimedia will require a higher bandwidth LAN to provide faster loading times for people accessing data. Your bandwidth and performance requirements should be consistent with the LAN functions identified in Section 1.a. Also, explain the load on your network during various times. Are there times when the network is likely to be busier?

If so, what could be some of the choke points in your network, and how do you plan to manage these? You may provide very high bandwidth links and several redundant servers to manage load and performance, but remember all this will make it an expensive network. Do you think your business service really requires an expensive network? Feel free to make assumptions in order to justify your expense tolerance for the network. I've attached the file needed. Update Page 14 A.3 Wired or wireless LAN bandwidth and performance requirements

Paper For Above instruction

Local Area Networks (LANs), whether wired or wireless, are vital infrastructures for efficient organizational operation, influencing data transfer speeds, network latency, load management, and overall costs. Analyzing LAN performance involves understanding tolerable delay, network load at different times, and the cost-effectiveness of network design. This paper evaluates these aspects within the context of a typical organizational need, considering multimedia application requirements, peak usage periods, potential choke points, and strategies for performance optimization.

Wired LANs are generally preferred for their stability, high bandwidth capacity, and lower latency. They are suitable for applications requiring fast and consistent data transfer, such as databases, enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, and multimedia content delivery. Wireless LANs, while offering flexibility and ease of deployment, tend to have higher latency and lower bandwidth compared to wired counterparts. However, advancements in wireless technology, including Wi-Fi 6 and beyond, have narrowed this gap, enabling wireless LANs to support bandwidth-intensive applications efficiently.

In terms of tolerable delay, wired LANs typically maintain latency below 1 millisecond, which is critical for real-time applications such as VoIP and video conferencing. Wireless LANs may experience higher delays, generally ranging from 1 to 10 milliseconds depending on interference and network congestion. Therefore, for latency-sensitive applications, a wired LAN is often preferable. Nonetheless, for general administrative or non-critical functions, wireless LANs offer sufficient performance.

Network load fluctuates significantly throughout the day. During peak hours—such as mornings, lunch breaks, or end-of-day periods—the network experiences increased traffic. This surge can lead to congestion, especially if the network lacks adequate bandwidth or load balancing. Choke points, or bottlenecks, commonly occur at network switches, routers, or wireless access points that serve high-traffic areas. Overloaded switches or outdated infrastructure can severely impact performance, causing delays and packet loss.

To manage these choke points, organizations can employ strategies such as upgrading infrastructure to support higher bandwidth links, implementing load balancing, or deploying redundant servers to distribute network traffic effectively. High bandwidth links, such as fiber optic connections, ensure sufficient capacity during peak periods. Redundant servers and network paths provide failover capabilities, maintaining service availability and performance even during hardware failures or high load.

However, these solutions come with increased costs. The decision to implement an expensive network should be justified by the organization's operational needs and budget constraints. For example, a company heavily reliant on multimedia content delivery or real-time transaction processing might justify higher investment to ensure optimal performance. Conversely, organizations with basic administrative functions may opt for a more moderate approach, balancing performance needs with cost considerations.

Assumptions may include anticipated growth in network traffic, the importance of multimedia applications, and the requirement for redundancy to prevent downtime. These assumptions enable the organization to justify expenditures on high-capacity links, enterprise-grade hardware, and redundant systems. Ultimately, the objective is to align network performance with business requirements while maintaining cost efficiency.

In conclusion, LAN bandwidth and performance requirements depend heavily on application needs, peak usage periods, and organizational priorities. A balanced approach—incorporating sufficient bandwidth, redundancy, and cost management—ensures reliable, efficient network operation tailored to the organization's specific demands.

References

• Comer, D. (2018). Internetworking with TCP/IP: Principles, Protocols, and Architecture. Pearson.
• Tanenbaum, A. S., & Wetherall, D. J. (2011). Computer Networks. Pearson.
• Odom, W. (2019). CCNA 200-301 Official Cert Guide, Volume 1 & 2. Cisco Press.
• Forouzan, B. A. (2017). Data Communications and Networking. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Cisco Systems. (2020). Wireless LAN Design Guide. Cisco White Paper.
• Murthy, C. S. R. (2010). Wireless Sensor Networks: Technology, Protocols, and Applications. Pearson.
• IEEE Standards Association. (2020). IEEE 802.11ax: High-Efficiency WLAN.
• Barroso, L. A., & Hölzle, U. (2009). The Datacenter as a Computer: An Introduction to the Design of Warehouse-Scale Machines. Morgan & Claypool.
• Mueller, M., & Grottke, M. (2020). High bandwidth networking for multimedia applications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(9), 34-39.
• Sharma, P., & Gungor, V. C. (2021). Designing resilient and efficient communication networks for smart cities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 116, 199-213.