With A Focus On The VBM Virtuous Organization Economic Cap

With A Focus On The Vbm Virtuous Organization Economic Capital Domain

With a focus on the VBM virtuous organization economic capital domain, critically reflect on your current organization’s world-changing impact and your participation for each of the four areas: Experience. What evidence-based experiences indicate your organization is or is not changing the world for good? Reflect. What has the organization done well? Not done so well? Needs to do better? What has been your role in how well the organization positively impacts the world? Reframe. How could the mission of your organization and your role in it be reframed to become a platform for positive change in the world? Reform. What reforms (alternatives to practices) are needed in your organization, your department, and in your role to effect positive change in the world? Access the Reflection page and record your reflections Write clear, compelling responses using the 12 good practices of critical reflection.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The concept of the virtuous organization rooted in the Value-Based Management (VBM) framework emphasizes ethical conduct, sustainable impact, and stakeholder well-being. In particular, the focus on the economic capital domain within VBM highlights how organizations leverage financial and intangible assets to foster positive societal transformations. This paper critically reflects on my current organization’s impact on the world, examining experiences, reflections, reframing strategies, and reforms required to enhance its positive influence in line with VBM principles.

Experience: Evidence of Changing the World for Good

Assessing whether the organization is changing the world for good involves examining concrete, evidence-based experiences. My organization, a multinational corporation dedicated to renewable energy solutions, demonstrates significant positive change through its contributions to reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable development. For instance, the deployment of solar energy projects in underserved communities has provided affordable, clean power, directly improving lives and local economies. This aligns with Porter and Kramer’s (2011) concept of creating shared value, where business success and societal progress go hand in hand.

Conversely, some experiences suggest areas where the organization has not fully realized its positive potential. Despite environmental projects, critiques highlight that supply chain practices sometimes overlook labor rights and environmental standards, indicating a gap between corporate social responsibility commitments and actual impact. These inconsistencies reveal that while the organization espouses virtuous aims, tangible outcomes may fall short of comprehensive societal benefit.

Reflection: Strengths, Gaps, and Personal Role

The organization’s strength lies in its strategic emphasis on sustainability and stakeholder engagement. Initiatives such as transparent reporting, community involvement, and investments in renewable research demonstrate a commitment to social good. However, challenges remain, particularly in integrating sustainability deeper into all operational levels, including supply chain management and corporate governance.

My role as a middle manager involves overseeing project implementation and engaging with local communities. I’ve contributed to fostering stakeholder trust and ensuring project alignment with sustainability goals. Nonetheless, I recognize that my influence could be expanded through greater advocacy for ethical practices and innovation in resource allocation. Reflecting critically, I see my participation as pivotal in either reinforcing or challenging the organization’s virtuous image, depending on my commitment and proactive engagement.

Reframing: Towards a Platform for Positive Change

Reframing the organization’s mission involves shifting from a primarily profit-oriented focus to a broader purpose centered on societal transformation. This could entail positioning the organization as a platform for systemic change—advancing clean energy, fostering social inclusion, and influencing policy development toward sustainability.

At an individual level, reframing my role might involve adopting a proactive stance in championing sustainable practices beyond assigned tasks. Acting as an internal advocate for innovation, I could promote initiatives that enhance social impact or influence strategic decisions aligning with the organization’s virtuous goals. Emphasizing shared values and long-term societal benefits can help reorient organizational purpose toward positive global impact.

Reforming: Necessary Practices for Effecting Change

Effective reform requires structural and cultural changes within the organization. Firstly, embedding sustainability into core business practices—such as procurement, R&D, and stakeholder engagement—is vital. This might mean establishing dedicated sustainability units that influence all departments and incentivize ethical innovation.

In my department, reforms could include adopting more transparent reporting standards to monitor impact holistically. Additionally, fostering a culture of continuous learning about social and environmental issues ensures everyone understands their role in positive change. On a personal level, reform entails developing skills in ethical leadership and stakeholder communication, thus better enabling advocacy for broader organizational reforms.

Furthermore, reforms should target supply chain accountability, implementing stricter standards and regular audits. This aligns with the principles of responsible business conduct outlined by the OECD (2011). These reforms not only mitigate risks but also position the organization as a leader in virtuous and sustainable enterprise practices.

Conclusion

In sum, my organization demonstrates promising strides toward positive societal impact through sustainable energy projects and stakeholder engagement. However, significant opportunities for improvement remain, particularly in integrating sustainability deeply into all facets of operations and fostering a culture of ethical excellence. Critical reflection underscores that my active participation and forward-thinking reforms are essential in transforming organizational practices into a robust platform for global positive change. Embracing a mission-centric, reform-oriented approach aligned with VBM’s virtues can guide the organization to achieve more significant, enduring impact for the world.

References

• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.
• OECD. (2011). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
• Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. New Society Publishers.
• Hart, S. L. (1995). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 16(2), 171–184.
• Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503-530.
• Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy become a cultural product? A cultural analysis of policy narratives. Policy Sciences, 29(4), 241–261.
• Cheney, G., & Monge, P. (2014). Organizational communication in an age of globalization. Routledge.
• Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2001). Environmental accounting, managerial capture and the control of corporate behaviour. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3), 319–355.
• Moon, J. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15(5), 296–306.