Wk6 Learning Resources Enter Your MyWalden Username Email ✓ Solved

Wk6 Learning Resourcesenter Your Mywalden User Name Emailprotect

Readings include articles on public administration ethics, administrative discretion, and the ethics of collaboration, such as Alexander & Richmond (2007), Catlaw & Jordan (2009), Ireni Saban (2011), Quill (2009), and Tuckness (2008). Media resources include Interactive Media: Virtual Community. Engage with these materials to understand key concepts in public administration ethics, discretion, collaboration, and the influence of philosophical perspectives like John Locke.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Public administration ethics is a fundamental aspect that governs the conduct of public servants and ensures trust in government institutions. Ethical considerations influence decision-making, discretion, collaboration, and accountability within public administration. This paper explores these themes through a review of selected scholarly articles and media resources, focusing on the importance of ethical behavior, the role of discretion, and the ethical challenges in collaborative governance.

Alexander and Richmond (2007) examine administrative discretion, questioning whether public administrators can transcend traditional rules, often referred to as "cider house rules." They argue that discretion must be exercised within ethical frameworks that balance flexibility with accountability. In practice, this means administrators should be guided not only by legal mandates but also by moral considerations that serve the public interest, thus fostering legitimacy and public trust. The concept of discretion involves not just strategic decision-making but also the moral responsibility to act ethically in ambiguous situations (Alexander & Richmond, 2007).

Similarly, Catlaw and Jordan (2009) delve into the ethics of collaboration in public administration, emphasizing the importance of mutual respect and shared responsibility among stakeholders. They caution against ethical lapses that can arise in collaborative processes, such as favoritism or lack of transparency. They advocate for an ethics of collaboration that recognizes the interconnectedness of public agencies and community partners, promoting transparency and equitable participation (Catlaw & Jordan, 2009). This approach aligns with the broader goal of fostering democratic legitimacy through ethical collaborative practices.

Ireni Saban (2011) expands on the ethical complexities by advocating for a nuanced understanding of equality in public administration. She emphasizes "complex equality," where administrators must consider diverse stakeholder perspectives and the socio-economic context of service recipients. This perspective challenges traditional notions of equality, urging public servants to recognize and address inequalities rooted in systemic biases. Such ethical sensitivity enhances the legitimacy of public services and promotes social justice (Ireni Saban, 2011).

Quill (2009) highlights the importance of integrity and loyalty in public service. She suggests that ethical conduct involves not only allegiance to organizational policies but also a moral commitment to the public good. Loyalty, when intelligently exercised, entails advisory independence and moral judgment, especially in situations where organizational directives conflict with ethical principles. Quill’s work underscores that ethical public servants balance organizational loyalty with their duty to serve ethically and transparently (Quill, 2009).

Tuckness (2008) offers a philosophical perspective by analyzing John Locke’s ideas on governance and authority. Locke’s emphasis on natural rights and government by consent influences public administration ethics, advocating for transparent and accountable governance. Understanding Locke’s philosophy helps public administrators appreciate the importance of legitimacy derived from the consent of the governed, which in turn informs ethical decision-making that respects individual rights and promotes political stability (Tuckness, 2008).

Interactive Media: Virtual Community exemplifies the role of online platforms in fostering transparent and participatory governance. These digital spaces enable public administrators to engage directly with citizens, gather input, and build trust. The virtual community illustrates how technological advances can support ethical administration by promoting openness, inclusivity, and real-time communication.

In conclusion, integrating ethical principles into public administration requires a multifaceted approach that respects discretion, promotes collaboration, ensures social justice, and upholds transparency and accountability. The scholarly articles and media resources reviewed highlight the importance of moral reasoning and philosophical insights in shaping ethical public service. As public administrators navigate complex societal challenges, their commitment to ethical conduct is vital for maintaining public trust and fostering democratic governance.

References

• Alexander, J., & Richmond, S. A. (2007). Administrative discretion: Can we move beyond cider house rules? The American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), 51–64.
• Catlaw, T. J., & Jordan, G. M. (2009). Public administration and "the lives of others": Toward an ethics of collaboration. Administration & Society, 41(3), 290–312.
• Ireni Saban, L. (2011). Looking into the eyes of those we serve: Toward complex equality in public administration ethics. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(2), 141–156.
• Quill, L. (2009). Ethical conduct and public service: Loyalty intelligently bestowed. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(3), 215–224.
• Tuckness, A. (2008). John Locke and public administration. Administration & Society, 40(3), 253–270.
• Interactive Media: Virtual Community. (n.d.). Retrieved from [source URL]