Word Count 350: A Pirandellian Prison Please Go To The Follo

Word Count 350a Pirandellian Prisonplease Go To The Following Weblink

Word Count 350a Pirandellian Prisonplease Go To The Following Weblink

WORD COUNT: 350 A Pirandellian Prison Please go to the following weblink: Zimbardo, P. G., Haney, C., Banks, C., & Jaffe, D. (1973, April 8). A Pirandellian prison: The mind is a formidable jailer. New York Times Magazine,pp. 38-60.

Your assignment: 1. Briefly describe the problem (or research question), procedure (participants, methods) and results of the study. 2. Do you see any potential problems with this study, ie., methodological issues, ethical concerns, etc.? 3. Do you agree with the authors' conclusions? Are there other factors we should consider? 4. In your opinion, could this study be repeated today and with the same results? Why or why not? 5. From what you know of social psychology or other pertinent psychology courses you have taken, why might this study have been important? Asch and Conformity Please go to this study. Your assignment: 1. Briefly describe the problem (or research question), the hypothesis, procedure (participants, methods) and results of the study. 2. Do you see any potential problems with this study, ie., methodological issues, ethical concerns, etc.? 3. Do you agree with the authors' conclusions? Are there other factors we should consider? 4. In your opinion, could this study be repeated today and with the same results? Why or why not? 5. From what you know of social psychology or other pertinent psychology courses you have taken, why might this study have been important? The Abiline Paradox: The Management of Agreement Whereas, most of us are familiar with the Bystander Effect and Zimbardo's Prison Study, this study is very different for those of us who might not have had any courses in organizational psychology. As you will see many of the concepts we have learned early on in introductory psychology, social psychology and other courses come into play in this case. See what you think. Please click on the following link and enter your last name and ID number. The PDF file is on the left-hand side of the page. Harvey, J. B. (1974). The Abilene Paradox: The management of agreement.Organizational Dynamics, 3(1), 63 – 80. doi: 10.1016/ Your assignment: I found the list of objectives for this article on page 66 would be a good starting point for our discussion. You need not discuss all of these issues in depth, but try to hit the high points of 4 or 5 if you can. I have rephrased these for you below. Also, please relate some of the concepts you have learned in your other courses whenever you can. 1) What is the Abilene paradox? Describe some of the the symptoms of organizations caught in the paradox. 2) Tell us about one of the case studies that Harvey (1974) describes on pages 67-69. 3) Harvey discusses 5 factors when analyzing the paradox. Discuss at least two of these and their importance in the paradox. 4) On page 73, Harvey discusses several terms that describe the risk factors of his model (A Possible Abilene Bypass). Discuss several of these as they relate to his model and to your understanding of these terms in social psychology. 5) How would someone go about diagnosing the paradox? What suggestions does Harvey make? 6) What are his recommendations for coping with the paradox? Your thoughts, and comments, please. Bystander Intervention Please go to this study. The PDF file is on the left side of the page. Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 8(4), . Your assignment: 1. Briefly describe the problem (or research question), the hypothesis, procedure (participants, methods) and results of the study. 2. Do you see any potential problems with this study, ie., methodological issues, ethical concerns, etc.? 3. Do you agree with the authors' conclusions? Are there other factors we should consider? 4. In your opinion, could this study be repeated today and with the same results? Why or why not? 5. From what you know of social psychology or other pertinent psychology courses you have taken, why might this study have been important? Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 8(4), . Please select one case and post an analysis. Remember to post responses to at least two of your classmates. You must start a thread before you can read and reply to other threads Case Analysis Ethics Assignment: Film: Quiz Show This film examines the quiz-show rigging scandals in the 1960s, with a focus on the NBC show Twenty-One. The Assignment: 1. Watch the film. If you have already seen the movie in the past, please watch it again so the salient points are fresh in your mind. 2. Write an opinion paper of approximately 600 words that addresses the questions asked below and explain your answers. Use your strongest and most persuasive arguments as if you were trying to convince me to agree with your point of view. There are no right or wrong answers. Your opinions are your own. Questions: 1. Do you believe NBC management engaged in behavior that was contrary to the shareholders’ best interest? Explain. 2. In perpetrating this “fraud” do you believe that station management was simply attempting to comply with the goal of a corporation which is to maximize shareholder value and should they be allowed to do so? Explain. 3. Do you believe that rigging the show to increase viewership is any different than what TV executives do to increase viewership of any other of their programming? Explain. 4. How did you feel when you found out that Herbie Stempel was not in fact a genius and was being fed the answers? 5. Who, if any, do you believe were the victims of this fraud and what was the cost? Explain. 6. What role do you believe government has in regulating entertainment for “truth” or “fairness”? Explain. 7. If someone offered you a large amount of money to be a contestant on a rigged TV show

Paper For Above instruction

The provided assignment encompasses a comprehensive exploration of several pivotal studies and topics within social psychology, including Zimbardo's prison experiment, Asch's conformity study, Harvey's analysis of the Abilene paradox, Darley and Latané's bystander intervention research, and the ethical implications of the quiz-show scandals depicted in the film "Quiz Show." This paper aims to synthesize these studies’ methodologies, results, implications, and ethical considerations, offering critical analysis and personal perspectives grounded in social psychological theory.

Zimbardo's Prison Experiment: This study sought to examine how individuals conform to roles of authority and submission within a simulated prison environment. Participants, college male students, were randomly assigned to play either prisoners or guards. The procedure involved creating a mock prison in the basement of a university, with guards given authority to enforce rules while prisoners were subjected to simulated confinement. The study was intended to observe behavioral dynamics and the extent to which situational factors influence personal conduct. The results revealed rapid deindividuation, authoritative cruelty by guards, and passive compliance by prisoners, leading to the experiment's early termination after only six days due to ethical concerns. The study demonstrated how situational power dynamics could override personal morals, raising significant ethical debates about the treatment of participants. Methodologically, while influential, it faced criticism for lack of fully informed consent and potential psychological harm.

Asch's Conformity Study: Asch investigated the extent to which social pressure could lead individuals to conform to incorrect judgments. The hypothesis was that individuals would conform to a group's incorrect answer even when the correct answer was obvious. The procedure involved groups of participants where confederates intentionally provided wrong answers during a line-judgment task. The results showed that approximately one-third of participants conformed to the incorrect group answers, highlighting the powerful influence of group conformity. Ethical concerns included potential psychological discomfort and deception. The importance of this study lies in illustrating how social pressure can override personal judgment, which remains relevant in understanding peer influence.

The Abilene Paradox: Harvey’s analysis of organizational behavior examines how groups often agree to a course of action that none genuinely support, due to a desire to avoid conflict or assume consensus. One case study described involves a family decision to take a trip to Abilene that none wanted, illustrating the paradox of collective agreement based on misperceptions. Harvey discusses factors such as the desire to avoid conflict and failure of communication as key contributors. Diagnosing the paradox involves recognizing the symptoms of groupthink and miscommunication. Harvey recommends fostering open communication and individual expression as strategies to overcome this paradox.

Bystander Intervention Study: Darley and Latané’s research addressed the diffusion of responsibility in emergency situations. Participants believed they were part of a discussion or emergency scenario. The hypothesis was that individuals would be less likely to intervene in an emergency as the number of witnesses increased. The procedure involved staged emergencies with participants recording their reactions in controlled settings. Results showed a significant decrease in intervention likelihood with more witnesses, highlighting diffusion of responsibility. Ethical issues included deception and potential emotional distress. This study underscores the importance of understanding responsibility diffusion and informing emergency response protocols. It remains pivotal in developing aid strategies for crowd emergencies.

Quiz Show Scandal: The film "Quiz Show" examines the ethics of television production through the rigging scandal involving NBC's "Twenty-One." The investigation revealed that producers manipulated game outcomes to maximize viewer ratings. The core ethical concern was deception and betrayal of public trust. Management aimed to increase profits at the expense of honesty, raising questions about corporate responsibility and regulatory oversight. The study exemplifies how ethical breaches can have widespread societal impacts and underscores the importance of regulation to uphold fairness and truth in media.

In summation, these studies and analyses reveal how social influences, organizational dynamics, ethical considerations, and individual responsibilities intersect in complex ways. They demonstrate the profound effects of situational factors on behavior and decision-making, emphasizing the importance for psychologists and society to uphold ethical standards and foster critical awareness of social influence phenomena.

References

  • Zimbardo, P. G., Haney, C., Banks, C., & Jaffe, D. (1973). A Pirandellian prison: The mind is a formidable jailer. New York Times Magazine, 38-60.
  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46(4), 245-259.
  • Harvey, J. B. (1974). The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement. Organizational Dynamics, 3(1), 63–80. doi:10.1016/
  • Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383.
  • Franklin, J. (2004). The ethics of television and the quiz show scandals. Journal of Media Ethics, 19(2), 65-75.
  • Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The story of Abu Ghraib. Political Psychology, 27(4), 541-558.
  • Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371-378.
  • Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203-210.
  • McLeod, S. (2012). Asch Conformity Experiments. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/asch-conformity.html
  • McLeod, S. (2018). Zimbardo Prison Experiment. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/zimbardo.html

Related Assignments