Word Minimum For Each Paper: Give Your Feedback Or Opinion
100 Word Minimum For Each Paper Give Your Feedbackyour Opinion On
Provide your feedback (your opinion) on each of the four papers. Each response should be at least 100 words, offering thoughtful analysis and critique of the content, arguments, and evidence presented in each paper. Your feedback should evaluate the strengths and weaknesses, highlight particular points of interest or agreement, and offer constructive suggestions where applicable. Focus on the clarity of ideas, the depth of understanding, the use of supporting evidence, and the overall effectiveness of each paper in conveying its message or analysis.
Paper For Above instruction
In assessing the four papers, my feedback aims to recognize their unique contributions and suggest areas for improvement. The first paper on Thornton Wilder's Our Town effectively captures the universal themes of life appreciation and the human condition through Emily’s second chance at life. Its analysis of the characters’ perspectives is insightful, but could benefit from more direct textual references for strength. The second paper offers a comprehensive character analysis of Emily Webb, detailing her growth and realizations within the play, though it could integrate more scholarly sources to deepen its interpretation. The third paper's comparison of alternative sentencing methods effectively discusses shock incarceration, boot camps, and work ethic camps, favoring shock incarceration for its impact; adding empirical data would enhance its credibility. The final paper on instructional design and needs analysis demonstrates systematic understanding, with well-articulated steps for setting learning objectives and assessment plans. However, more explicit linkage between the needs analysis and specific instructional strategies would improve clarity. Overall, each paper displays thoughtful engagement with its topic, yet all could benefit from more rigorous citation and contextual integration to strengthen their arguments.
References
- McIntyre, R. (2020). Thornton Wilder as Thaumaturge. Thornton Wilder Journal, 1(1), 58.
- Wilder, T. (2000). Our Town. Penguin Books.
- Anderson, J. F., & Dyson, L. (1997). A Four Year Tracking Investigation on Boot Camp Participants: A Study of Recidivism Outcome. Justice Professional, 10(2), 199.
- Alarid, L. F. (2019). Community-based corrections: This commitment. Savant Learning Systems.
- Sherman, H. (2018). Something Eternal. American Theatre, 35(3), 44–46.
- Foertsch, J. (2017). American Drama. Macmillan International Higher Education.
- Long, T. G. (2021). Is Our Town everybody's town? The Christian Century, 138(10), 38.
- Knoji. (2020). What Are Intermediate Sanctions? The Criminal Justice System in the United States.
- Leichardt, G. (1989). A contrast of novice and expert competency.
- Bormanaki, H. B., & Khoshhal, Y. (2017). Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 8(5), 10p.