Word Response: Chicago Style Citing According To Kluver

Word Response Chicago Style Citing According To Kluver

250 Word Response Chicago Style Citing According To Kluver

According to Kluver, the ramifications of technology and globalization on global communication are profound, resulting in both increased interconnectedness and significant challenges such as cultural homogenization and language loss. Kluver emphasizes that while technological advancements facilitate faster and broader dissemination of information across borders, they also threaten the diversity of local cultures and languages. This tension aligns with recent discussions on endangered languages, where globalization accelerates language endangerment by promoting dominant languages like English and diminishing indigenous linguistic diversity (Jandt, 2004, 99-102). Similarly, the digital divide highlights disparities where access to technological resources remains uneven, privileging certain groups over others and increasing global inequalities (Mühlhäusler, 2004). These phenomena reflect a broader trend of intensified intercultural communication driven by digital media, which both bridges and broadens gaps among communities. The convergence of globalization, informatization, and intercultural exchange results in a more interconnected yet conflict-ridden global communication landscape. While technology enables instant communication and cultural exchange, it also risks marginalizing local voices and eroding linguistic diversity. Overall, the readings underscore a trajectory toward heightened digital connectivity that simultaneously threatens cultural plurality, illustrating the complex impacts of modern communication trends.

Paper For Above instruction

In exploring the impact of technology and globalization on global communication, Kluver's analysis underscores transformative shifts that have redefined intercultural interactions in the contemporary era. His arguments reveal that while technological progress has facilitated unprecedented connectivity, it also presents significant challenges such as cultural homogenization and linguistic erosion. This duality mirrors the concerns raised in discussions of endangered languages, where increased global communication opportunities often accelerate language decline. For example, Jandt (2004) notes that dominant languages like English tend to overshadow indigenous languages, threatening their survival as smaller communities find it difficult to maintain their linguistic heritage amidst the global spread of major tongues. Similarly, the digital divide exacerbates inequalities by limiting access to these new communication platforms, privileging affluent and developed nations while marginalizing less privileged populations (Mühlhäusler, 2004). These interconnected issues highlight a broader trend: as communication becomes more digital and instantaneous, there is a risk of diminishing cultural and linguistic diversity. However, technological advancements also offer opportunities for minority groups to assert their voices globally. Overall, the intersection of globalization and informatization fosters a complex landscape where increased connectivity can either threaten or empower cultural identities, depending on how access and preservation are managed.

References

  • Kluver, R. (2010). Globalization, Information, and Intercultural Communication. In Jandt, F. E. (Ed.), Intercultural Communication: A Global Reader (pp. 99-102). Sage Publications.
  • Jandt, F. E. (2004). Part II: Language. In Intercultural Communication: A Global Reader. Sage Publications.
  • Mühlhäusler, P. (2004). Babel Revisited. In Jandt, F. E. (Ed.), Intercultural Communication: A Global Reader. Sage Publications.
  • Bâ, N. (2004). Africa: The Power of Speech. In Jandt, F. E. (Ed.), Intercultural Communication: A Global Reader. Sage Publications.
  • Penetito, J. (2004). Research and Context for a Theory of Maori Schooling. In Jandt, F. E. (Ed.), Intercultural Communication: A Global Reader. Sage Publications.
  • Steiner, R. (2018). The Digital Divide and Its Impact on Global Societies. Journal of Global Communication Studies, 12(3), 45-62.
  • Shah, D., & Kumar, R. (2020). The Role of Technology in Cultural Preservation. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(2), 178-193.
  • Smith, J. K. (2019). Language Loss and the Digital Age. Language Documentation & Conservation, 13, 231-245.
  • Hafez, K. (2017). International Communication and Cultural Diversity. Media, Culture & Society, 39(6), 852-860.
  • Ginsburg, F. D. (1989). The Positive Power of Oppositional Knowledge. Cultural Anthropology, 4(4), 436-447.

Related Assignments