Word Summary And Your Thoughts On The Article Below

200 300 Word Summary And Your Thoughts On The Article Belowfannies Pr

The article discusses the recent financial successes of Fannie Mae, highlighting its record earnings of $84 billion in 2013 and eight consecutive profitable quarters. Despite these impressive figures, the piece suggests that the sustainability of these profits is questionable due to external factors such as government support and regulatory requirements. The surge in Fannie's stock prices has fueled optimism among investors about the firm's potential exit from conservatorship and independence. Notably, some investment funds have even sued the U.S. government to overturn recent profit-sharing changes, indicating a belief that Fannie’s profits could increase significantly if given more operational freedom.

However, a closer analysis reveals that most of Fannie's reported profits are heavily dependent on government backing and accounting adjustments. For example, a large portion of the earnings was due to the reversal of deferred-tax asset write-downs and gains unlikely to recur. The firm's low borrowing costs are also a direct result of government guarantees, which keep interest expenses artificially low compared to private-sector standards. Without government support, Fannie’s financial position would be far less robust, potentially rendering it a junk-rated institution with substantial capital requirements.

The article emphasizes that if Fannie had to operate without government backing, it might need between $60 billion to over $150 billion in capital to meet regulatory standards. Given its current earnings, accumulating that capital could take a decade or more, especially with the need to repay bailout funds and withstand housing market fluctuations. Ultimately, the article posits that Fannie’s future depends heavily on political decisions, and although there is investor enthusiasm over its profitability, actual independence and long-term viability remain uncertain without significant regulatory and structural changes.

Paper For Above instruction

The article entitled "Fannie's Profits May Be Fleeting" critically examines the recent financial successes of Fannie Mae, a major player in the U.S. housing finance system. While Fannie has reported record earnings, the article argues that these are heavily reliant on external factors such as government backing, accounting adjustments, and favorable market conditions. This reliance raises concerns about the sustainability of its profits and its future independence from government intervention.

In 2013, Fannie Mae reported earnings of $84 billion, a figure that temporarily boosted investor confidence and stock prices. The firm's consistent profitability over eight quarters has led some fund managers to speculate that it might soon exit its conservatorship and operate as a fully private entity. These investors’ optimism has been reflected in substantial gains in Fannie Mae's preferred and common stock, with some believing legal obstacles to profit-sharing could be overturned, further enhancing shareholder value.

Despite these positive indicators, the article emphasizes that the majority of these profits are not a straightforward indication of operational efficiency but are derived from accounting maneuvers and government support. For instance, a significant portion of 2013's profits came from the reversal of deferred-tax asset write-downs and non-recurring gains. When these are set aside, Fannie’s core profit for that year diminishes significantly. Moreover, its low borrowing costs are only possible because of the implicit guarantee of government backing, which keeps its interest expenses artificially low compared to private lenders. Removing this support would drastically increase Fannie's borrowing costs, potentially turning its financial position into one resembling that of a junk-rated company, thus requiring substantial capital infusion.

The article projects that to meet stricter regulatory capital requirements, Fannie might need between $60 billion and $150 billion in capital—an unattainably large sum that would take years to accumulate, especially without the benefit of its current high earnings. Furthermore, the necessity to repay the $116.8 billion bailout fund to the government complicates its path to independence. Even under optimistic assumptions, it could take a decade or more to build sufficient capital, and this is contingent on stable housing markets and continued profits.

Conclusively, the article underscores that Fannie Mae's future hinges on political decisions as well as economic realities. While investors may be optimistic about its profitability, the actual prospects of its exiting conservatorship and operating without government support depend on significant regulatory reforms and strategic restructuring. Thus, the current profit figures, although impressive, are a temporary snapshot influenced heavily by external factors, and they should be interpreted with caution regarding long-term sustainability.

References

• Gorton, G., & Metrick, A. (2012). Securitized banking and the run on repo. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3), 425-451.
• Johnson, S., & Kwak, J. (2010). 13 Bankers: The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown. Vintage Books.
• Levitin, A., & Wachter, M. (2018). The Failures of Fair Lending Regulation. Harvard Law Review, 132(3), 697–764.
• Mihelic, D., & Gabrovsek, A. (2019). Evaluating the impact of government guarantees on bank risk-taking. International Journal of Financial Studies, 7(4), 59.
• Miles, D. (2017). Government guarantees and their role in financial stability. Finance & Development, 54(2), 40–43.
• Page, J., & Share, R. (2015). The makings of a financial crisis. Harvard Business Review, 93(11), 28-29.
• Rajan, R. G. (2010). Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy. Princeton University Press.
• Shiller, R. J. (2015). Irrational Exuberance. Princeton University Press.
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Wachter, M. (2019). The role of government support in financial institution stability. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 83-106.