Words Citation References: Provide Two Different Examples

250 Words Citation Referencest3dq1provide Two Different Examples Of Ho

Provide two different examples of how research uses hypothesis testing, and describe the criteria for rejecting the null hypothesis. Discuss why this is important in your practice and with patient interactions. Evaluate and provide examples of how hypothesis testing and confidence intervals are used together in health care research. Provide a workplace example that illustrates your ideas. Read "Chapter 11: Logic of Hypothesis Testing," and watch the associated videos by Lane, from Online Statistics Education: An Interactive Multimedia Course of Study. URL: Refer to the "Visual Learner: Statistics" to learn more about the statistical calculations presented in this topic. URL: Read "Chapter 6: Research Design" and watch the associated videos, by Lane, from Online Statistics Education: An Interactive Multimedia Course of Study. URL: Read "Chapter 10: Estimation" and watch the associated videos, by Lane, from Online Statistics Education: An Interactive Multimedia Course of Study. URL: Read "Probability, Clinical Decision Making and Hypothesis Testing," by Banerjee, Jadhave, and Bhawalker, from Industrial Psychiatry Journal (2009). URL:

Paper For Above instruction

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental aspect of research methodology used extensively in healthcare to determine the validity of assumed relationships or effects. This statistical process allows researchers and practitioners to make informed decisions based on data, ensuring that conclusions drawn are scientifically justified. Below are two examples illustrating how hypothesis testing is employed in health research, along with the criteria for rejecting the null hypothesis.

The first example involves evaluating a new medication's efficacy in reducing blood pressure. Researchers formulate a null hypothesis stating that there is no difference in blood pressure reduction between patients treated with the new drug and those receiving a placebo. The alternative hypothesis suggests that the new medication leads to a significant decrease. Using a t-test to analyze data collected from clinical trials, if the resulting p-value is less than the predetermined significance level (commonly 0.05), researchers reject the null hypothesis. This indicates that the medication has a statistically significant effect. Such hypothesis testing is crucial in clinical practice because it helps determine whether a new treatment should be adopted, directly impacting patient care decisions and optimizing health outcomes (Creswell, 2014).

The second example concerns assessing the impact of a dietary intervention on cholesterol levels. Researchers hypothesize that the dietary change will not affect cholesterol levels (null hypothesis), versus the hypothesis that it does. After collecting data, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) is performed. If the p-value obtained is below 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected, confirming the intervention’s effectiveness. Recognizing statistically significant results guides clinicians in recommending evidence-based dietary modifications, illustrating how hypothesis testing informs patient-centered interventions (Polit & Beck, 2017).

Hypothesis testing complements confidence intervals by providing a range within which the true effect size is likely to lie, with a certain level of confidence (typically 95%). When used together, they offer a comprehensive understanding of study results. For example, in a hospital setting, a researcher might investigate whether a new wound care protocol reduces healing time. The hypothesis test could determine if the difference in healing durations is statistically significant, while the confidence interval would estimate the magnitude of the effect. If the confidence interval does not include zero, it corroborates the rejection of the null hypothesis, strengthening confidence in the intervention’s benefit (Banerjee, Jadhave, & Bhawalker, 2009). This combined approach enhances clinical decision-making by quantifying both the likelihood and the size of treatment effects, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.

In conclusion, hypothesis testing in healthcare research provides a systematic method to evaluate treatment effects, diagnostic tools, or interventions. When paired with confidence intervals, it allows healthcare professionals to make robust, evidence-based decisions, improving patient outcomes and advancing clinical practice.

References

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Wolters Kluwer Health.
  • Banerjee, J., Jadhave, P., & Bhawalker, A. (2009). Probability, Clinical Decision Making and Hypothesis Testing. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 18(2), 131–137.
  • Lane, D. M. (n.d.). Logic of Hypothesis Testing. Online Statistics Education: An Interactive Multimedia Course of Study. The Statistics Education Research Group.
  • Lane, D. M. (n.d.). Research Design. Online Statistics Education: An Interactive Multimedia Course of Study.
  • Lane, D. M. (n.d.). Estimation. Online Statistics Education: An Interactive Multimedia Course of Study.
  • Huitema, B. E. (2011). The Analysis of Covariance and Alternatives: Statistical Methods for Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, and Sequential Designs. Wiley.
  • McNeill, A., & Wald, N. (2010). Evidence-Based Medicine in Practice. British Medical Journal, 341, c5424.
  • Lorenc, A., & Kieć-Świerczyńska, M. (2020). Application of Confidence Intervals in Clinical Research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 124, 102–111.
  • Sullivan, L. M. (2018). Essentials of Biostatistics in Public Health. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Related Assignments