Words In The Interactive Learning Module You Meet The Campbe

250 Wordsin The Interactive Learning Module You Meet The Campbell Fam

In the Interactive Learning Module, you meet the Campbell family: Karen (mom), Joe (dad), Jacob (son), and Kali (daughter). For this question, consider the Campbell family as presented in the Campbell Family Case Study. They have come into your community mental health office where you have been assigned to assist this family. The family presents as very upset that Jacob may have to go to jail for stealing the neighbor’s vehicle. The family feels that it would be detrimental to his mental health and that it is "unfair" that he may be charged with a felony.

The family feels that they are being targeted because they are poor. Complete the following: Use the PCS analysis framework and identify areas that impact the Campbell family. Choose one family member to identify beliefs, attitudes and areas of prejudice they may be experiencing. Discuss the cultural level of stereotypes and assumptions that are intergenerational that impact the family. Evaluate the societal level that is impacting this family (race, class, gender, language groups, religion, sexuality, etc.).

At this time, use your assessment skills to determine which areas are the most impactful to them individually and as a family. Critically reflect and identify which theories you would use to intervene with the above identified issues. You must use at least two theories to assess the family issues.

Paper For Above instruction

The Campbell family faces multiple interconnected challenges influenced by personal, cultural, and societal factors, which significantly impact their mental health and functioning. Utilizing the PCS (Person-Centered Systemic) analysis framework offers a comprehensive method to assess these issues by examining Person, Context, and System levels. This approach allows for a nuanced understanding of how individual beliefs, cultural stereotypes, and societal marginalization converge to affect family dynamics and perception.

At the person level, Jacob is central to the current crisis. His family perceives him as a troublemaker, but underlying this is a potential belief that his actions are a reflection of his environment and personal struggles. Jacob may harbor feelings of shame, guilt, or hopelessness, which can be exacerbated by the family's perception of unfair treatment and societal bias. Family member Joe, the father, may hold stereotypes rooted in his own upbringing—such as associating criminal behavior with poverty or lack of discipline—reinforcing intergenerational biases. These attitudes are often reinforced by societal stereotypes linking poverty and criminality, which marginalize families like the Campbells.

At the cultural level, stereotypes about race, class, and economic status play a significant role. The family's perception that they are targeted because of their poverty reflects societal prejudices that criminalize impoverished communities. Such stereotypes are often perpetuated through media portrayals and institutional biases, leading families like the Campbells to internalize feelings of injustice and marginalization. These societal pressures may exacerbate feelings of helplessness, resentment, and fear, contributing to a cycle of stigma and internalized oppression.

The societal factors—such as systemic racism, economic inequality, and lack of access to resources—compound the family's struggles. For example, if the family belongs to a racial minority, they might experience discrimination within the criminal justice system, further influencing Jacob’s legal situation and the family's perceptions of fairness and justice. Gender roles and language barriers may also influence how family members communicate and cope with stress, affecting their resilience and support systems.

In assessing which areas are most impactful, it is evident that systemic and societal influences profoundly shape the family’s experiences. Interventions should focus on empowering the family through culturally sensitive approaches that acknowledge and address these structural barriers. For example, family therapy grounded in Narrative Theory could help reframe their stories around power and resilience, while integrating Strengths-Based approaches can foster hope and self-efficacy.

Additionally, utilizing Ecological Systems Theory provides a comprehensive view of how interactions between individual, family, community, and societal levels influence their circumstances. This perspective promotes interventions directed at not only individual behaviors but also broader systemic change, such as advocacy for equitable treatment within the justice system and social services.

References

• Becvar, D. S., & Becvar, R. J. (2017). Family therapy: A systemic integration. Routledge.
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
• Combs, G., & Freedman, J. (2013). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Coleman, P., & Curtis, R. (2020). Social justice and mental health: Addressing systemic inequities. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(4), 767–781.
• McGoldrick, M., Giordano, P., & Garcia-Preto, N. (2016). Ethnicity and family therapy. Guilford Publications.
• Payne, M. (2014). Modern social work theory. Oxford University Press.
• Parker, R., & Hansen, J. (2019). Intersectionality and social justice in social work. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 16(2), 12–20.
• Rolnick, A., & Frye, A. (2018). Systemic approaches to social work practice. Sage Publications.
• Walls, N. (2021). Poverty, systemic racism, and mental health disparities. Journal of Social Policy, 50(1), 45–61.
• Weikel, W. (2017). Cultural competence in social work practice. Routledge.