Words Kadushin And Harkness Use Chapter 10 LinkedIn Resource

250 Words kadushin And Harkness Use Chapter 10 Linked In Resources To

Kadushin and Harkness, in Chapter 10, explore the complex issues faced by supervisors in the social work field, focusing on the tension between ongoing supervision requirements, licensure standards, and the autonomy of practice. This ongoing debate raises critical questions about maintaining professional standards while honoring the independence of licensed social workers. From my perspective as a licensed social worker, I see the importance of supervision in ensuring accountability, ethical practice, and ongoing professional development (Bogo, 2013). Supervision safeguards clients and promotes competent practice, but it can sometimes feel restrictive or paternalistic, especially when practitioners value autonomy and wish to tailor their approaches to individual client needs.

From the supervisor’s perspective, enforcing supervision standards is essential for maintaining quality and consistency across services. Supervision also serves as a tool for mentoring and supporting less experienced colleagues, which benefits the profession overall (Kadushin & Harkness, 2002). However, supervisors must balance oversight with respect for the social worker’s professional judgment. The debate intensifies when considering licensure requirements—these mandated standards aim to protect clients, yet may sometimes appear to limit a social worker’s discretion or innovation in practice (Ruch, 2015).

Balancing these perspectives requires embracing a model of supervision that promotes ethical oversight and professional autonomy. As both a licensed social worker and a supervisor, I believe fostering open communication, setting clear expectations, and encouraging reflective practice are crucial. Using evidence-based supervisory models, such as strengths-based supervision (Saleebey, 2013), can reconcile the need for oversight with respect for professional judgment. Ultimately, cultivating a collaborative supervisory relationship ensures that ethical standards are upheld while empowering social workers’ independence, contributing to their growth and the well-being of clients.

Paper For Above instruction

As a licensed social worker and a supervisor, navigating the tension between ongoing supervision requirements, licensure standards, and the autonomy of practice presents ongoing challenges rooted in maintaining professional integrity and ethical standards. Kadushin and Harkness (2002) highlight that supervision is vital for assuring competent practice, professional growth, and safeguarding clients. These core principles support the need for oversight but can, at times, conflict with a social worker’s desire for independence and personalized client approaches.

From the perspective of a social worker, supervision offers essential guidance, feedback, and accountability. It ensures adherence to ethical standards, helps navigate complex cases, and promotes continuous learning (Bogo, 2013). However, excessive oversight or rigid policies may hinder clinical judgment or innovation, potentially stifling creativity and professional confidence. The tension lies in balancing the need for supervision to protect clients and uphold standards while allowing social workers the autonomy to develop and implement tailored interventions.

Conversely, supervisors view their role as crucial in fostering quality assurance and professional development. They must ensure practitioners meet licensure requirements, adhere to ethical guidelines, and provide effective services. Yet, they also recognize that fostering autonomy in practice enhances job satisfaction and professional competence (Kadushin & Harkness, 2002). It is essential for supervisors to facilitate a collaborative environment where social workers feel valued and supported, rather than solely monitored.

In my dual role, I aim to blend these perspectives through a model of reflective and strengths-based supervision (Saleebey, 2013). This approach promotes trust, encourages self-awareness, and respects professional judgment. Clear communication about expectations, ongoing education, and fostering an open dialogue are vital to balancing oversight with independence. Such a model not only enhances ethical practice but also empowers social workers to exercise their autonomy responsibly, ultimately benefiting clients and the profession alike.

References

• Bogo, M. (2013). Peer support for social work supervision: Promoting reflective practice. Clinical Supervisor, 32(2), 156-169.
• Kadushin, A., & Harkness, J. (2002). Supervision in Social Work. Columbia University Press.
• Ruch, G. (2015). Towards a subjectivity of supervision: An ethical perspective. British Journal of Social Work, 45(4), 927-943.
• Saleebey, D. (2013). The Power of the Powerless: A Strengths-Based Approach to Supervision. Thomson Brooks/Cole.