Words Or More: 20 Ov Score You Should Have At Least 2 Credib

600 Words Or More 20 Ov Scoreyou Should Have At Least 2 Credible Sou

Now that you are in charge of a significant function as the vice president (VP) of corporate organizational development that helps the organization to move in new strategic directions, you are being challenged. You have change programs in various stages of implementation at a large number of the 60 companies in your portfolio. Some of the companies are doing quite well, and others are stalling or are nonresponsive to the change initiatives that are being implemented. Several of the line managers are asking why some changes are having more success than others.

You have a feeling that there is resistance that is taking place, and you want to roll out some new concepts and ideas to help the leaders of these companies handle this resistance. A number of these same leaders have asked you for a proposal that would help them understand the phenomenon and perhaps create action plans to address these issues. Discuss the following: What are the applicable models and strategies? What are at least 3 specific recommended steps that can be taken in the present situation described above? What would the cost of these steps be in time and money? What might an action plan include that could serve as a template for future action plans?

Paper For Above instruction

Organizational change is an inevitable and necessary aspect of strategic development, especially in today’s dynamic business environment. Resistance to change, however, remains a significant barrier that can impede successful implementation. Understanding applicable models and strategies for managing resistance is crucial for leaders in facilitating effective change processes across diverse organizations. This paper explores relevant models, proposes specific steps, assesses costs, and outlines an action plan to respond to resistance challenges encountered by the portfolio of companies overseen by the Vice President of Organizational Development.

Several models have been developed to understand and address resistance to change. Among the most prominent is Kurt Lewin’s Change Management Model, which involves three stages: Unfreeze, Change, and Refreeze (Lewin, 1947). The Unfreeze stage prepares organizations for change by identifying and challenging existing attitudes and behaviors. The Change stage involves the actual implementation of new processes or structures. Finally, the Refreeze stage stabilizes the organization at a new equilibrium. Lewin’s model emphasizes the importance of communication, participation, and support during transition phases to minimize resistance.

Another relevant framework is Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model, which provides a comprehensive approach to managing resistance through creating a compelling urgency, forming guiding coalitions, developing and communicating a clear vision, empowering broad-based action, generating short-term wins, consolidating gains, and anchoring new approaches into the culture (Kotter, 1996). This model advocates for leadership engagement and clear communication strategies that foster buy-in and reduce resistance.

Strategic strategies for addressing resistance include engaging stakeholders early in the process, establishing transparent communication channels, and providing continuous support and training. Such approaches facilitate buy-in and help mitigate employee fears and uncertainties. Additionally, leveraging change champions within the organization can influence peer attitudes and foster acceptance of new initiatives.

Based on these models and strategies, three specific recommended steps for the situation described include:

1. Conduct a comprehensive resistance assessment: Identify specific sources and types of resistance—whether they stem from fear of loss, misunderstanding, or perceived lack of benefit. This assessment can be performed through surveys, interviews, or focus groups and will inform targeted interventions.
2. Implement targeted communication and engagement programs: Develop tailored messaging that articulates the benefits of change, addresses concerns directly, and involves employees in decision-making processes. Regular updates and forums for dialogue can foster transparency.
3. Establish change champions and support networks: Identify influential leaders or employees within each organization who can advocate for change, model desired behaviors, and provide peer support. Training and empowering these advocates are critical for sustaining momentum.

The costs associated with these steps are both time and financial. Conducting assessments and developing communication plans require investment in human resources, including consultants or internal staff time, estimated at approximately 10-15 hours per organization, with associated costs ranging from $2,000 to $5,000 per company. Training change champions involves additional time, roughly 8-12 hours per champion, and costs depending on the number of champions involved. Implementing these steps may extend the overall change timeline by several months but can significantly reduce resistance-driven delays and costs associated with failed change initiatives.

An effective action plan template for future change initiatives should include the following components:

• Situation analysis: Identifying existing resistance sources and organizational readiness.
• Objectives: Setting clear, measurable goals for change adoption.
• Stakeholder engagement plan: Strategies for stakeholder involvement, communication, and change champion identification.
• Implementation timeline: Phased approach with deadlines and milestones.
• Resource allocation: Budget, personnel, and support structures required.
• Monitoring and evaluation: Metrics for tracking progress, feedback mechanisms, and corrective actions.

In conclusion, managing resistance requires a systematic application of proven models like Lewin’s and Kotter’s frameworks, supported by strategic actions such as assessing resistance, engaging stakeholders effectively, and empowering change agents. Though these steps entail upfront costs in time and resources, their implementation can significantly enhance the likelihood of successful change outcomes across the diverse portfolio of companies. Developing standardized action plans can serve as valuable templates, streamlining future change processes while minimizing resistance and maximizing organizational agility.

References

• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5-41.
• Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2009). Refining the idea of preparing employees for change. Organizational Dynamics, 38(1), 55-60.
• Kotter, J. P., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2008). Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review, 86(7/8), 130-139.
• Appelbaum, S. H., et al. (2012). Change follow-through: The missing link. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(1), 115-129.
• Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 977-1002.
• Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 133-141.
• Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government and our community. Prosci.
• Senior, B., & Swailes, S. (2004). Organisational change: Narrative reviews and implications for future research. Journal of Change Management, 4(4), 357-375.
• Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (2009). Decoding resistance to change. Harvard Business Review, 87(4), 99-105.