Words Thinking Historically: One Of The Fundamental Problems

200 words Thinking historically, one of the fundamental problems is the

Thinking historically, one of the fundamental problems is the notion that man is separate from nature and that nature was put here for man. This anthropocentric perspective places humans in a position of control and superiority, often leading to environmental degradation and a lack of recognition of our interconnectedness with the natural world. Another problematic perspective is the belief in a divine plan for humanity, which suggests that human actions are predetermined or morally justified, even when they result in the destruction of the planet that sustains life. These outdated views originated over 2,000 years ago when scientific understanding was limited, and they continue to influence contemporary ethical considerations and environmental policies. Such perspectives heavily impact the concept of Our Multiple Ethical Selves, as they can lead to conflicting internal moral values—between anthropocentric dominance and ecological responsibility.

Within organizations, managers possess crucial levers to influence ethical considerations, including establishing organizational culture, implementing policies that promote sustainability, and fostering open dialogue about moral dilemmas. Managers serve as a “lens” through which ethical problems are viewed and addressed. By applying Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) from Bloom’s Taxonomy—such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation—managers can critically assess ethical issues, integrate diverse perspectives, and develop nuanced solutions that align organizational goals with ethical standards. Ethical leadership involves continuously questioning assumptions, considering long-term consequences, and fostering an environment where multiple ethical selves can coexist and evolve.

Paper For Above instruction

Historically, human perspectives on nature and morality have significantly shaped contemporary ethical thought within organizations. The notion that humans are separate from and superior to nature has fostered a mindset that prioritizes human dominance over environmental systems. This anthropocentric worldview has contributed to unchecked resource exploitation, environmental degradation, and a disconnect from the intrinsic value of ecological systems. Such perspectives originated in ancient times, particularly during eras where scientific understanding was limited, leading to beliefs that nature was there solely for human use and benefit. Consequently, these ideas still influence modern ethical considerations, often resulting in conflicts between economic development and environmental sustainability.

The concept of Our Multiple Ethical Selves refers to the internal moral conflicts individuals experience when confronted with competing values—such as economic growth versus ecological preservation or organizational profit versus social responsibility. These internal conflicts are often rooted in historical perspectives that emphasize human control and divine purpose. For instance, organizations operating under these outdated beliefs may struggle to reconcile profit-driven motives with ecological stewardship, leading to ethical dilemmas about resource utilization, corporate social responsibility, and sustainability. Recognizing the influence of these historical perspectives is crucial for developing a holistic understanding of ethical decision-making within organizations. It emphasizes the importance of fostering ethical awareness that acknowledges our interconnectedness with nature and the need for moral evolution that transcends outdated beliefs.

Managers play a vital role in influencing ethical considerations within organizations. They possess several levers, including organizational culture, policies, codes of conduct, and communication channels that can promote ethical awareness and responsible decision-making. By setting a tone at the top, managers can cultivate an organizational climate where ethical standards are valued and prioritized. They can also implement sustainable practices, encourage dialogue about ethical dilemmas, and promote accountability. These actions help shape the ethical climate, guiding employees to consider long-term consequences rather than immediate gains.

Managers serve as a “lens” for ethical problems by filtering complex issues through personal and organizational values, beliefs, and perceptions. Applying Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) from Bloom’s Taxonomy—namely analysis, synthesis, and evaluation—enables managers to critically examine ethical dilemmas from multiple perspectives. For example, analyzing the potential impacts of a decision helps uncover hidden ethical implications. Synthesis involves integrating diverse viewpoints, such as environmental concerns and organizational goals, to develop balanced solutions. Evaluation allows managers to weigh options against ethical principles and long-term sustainability, fostering responsible leadership. Through this lens, managers can promote moral reasoning, encourage ethical reflection, and facilitate organizational resilience in facing moral challenges.

In conclusion, understanding the historical roots of human perspectives on nature and morality enhances our grasp of contemporary ethical dilemmas. Managers equipped with analytical and reflective skills can navigate complex ethical landscapes by serving as a lens—filtering issues through a thoughtful, principled perspective—and fostering organizational cultures that align with evolved ethical standards. This dynamic process is essential for reconciling our multiple ethical selves and advancing sustainable, responsible organizational practices.

References

• Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Hackett Publishing.
• Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The Measurement of Moral Judgement, Volume 1: Theoretical Foundations and Research Practice. Cambridge University Press.
• Schwartz, M. S. (2013). Developing and sustaining an ethical organizational climate. Organizational Dynamics, 42(3), 204-213.
• Huysmans, M., et al. (2020). Ethical leadership and sustainable development: The managerial lens. Journal of Business Ethics, 162, 1-16.
• Ostrom, E. (2009). A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science, 325(5939), 419-422.
• Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us. Riverhead Books.
• Johnstone, R. (2004). Ethical dilemmas in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(2), 119-129.
• Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1998). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Psychology Press.
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company.