Wordseddison Electronic Company Inc Provides Electricity

350 450 Wordseddison Electronic Company Eec Provides Electricity For

words Eddison Electronic Company (EEC) provides electricity for several states in the United States. You have been employed as a cost accountant at this organization. You were asked to provide training to operational managers in areas in which they are struggling, such as internal rate of return, simple rate of return, and net present value. Please discuss the following: How is the internal rate of return calculated? Explain how it supports a capital business decision versus the NPV model. Explain how simple rate of return has been used in a company you are familiar with related to capital budgeting.

Paper For Above instruction

The evaluation of investment projects is a critical aspect of capital budgeting, and understanding various financial metrics such as the Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Net Present Value (NPV), and Simple Rate of Return (SRR) is essential for effective decision-making. As a cost accountant at Eddison Electronic Company (EEC), providing comprehensive training to operational managers on these concepts is vital to ensure informed investment decisions that align with the company's strategic goals.

Calculation of Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

The IRR is a discount rate that makes the net present value (NPV) of all cash flows from a particular project equal to zero. It is calculated through iterative methods, often using financial calculators or software like Excel, which employ algorithms to approximate the rate. The fundamental formula involves solving for the rate (r) in the following equation:

NPV = ∑ (C_t / (1 + r)^t) = 0

where C_t is the cash flow in period t, and r is the IRR. The process involves testing different discount rates until the NPV equals zero, indicating the project’s adjustable rate of return.

IRR Versus NPV in Capital Decision-Making

The IRR is widely used for its intuitive appeal; it provides a percentage return expected from a project, which stakeholders can compare to the company's required rate of return or cost of capital. If the IRR exceeds the company's hurdle rate, the project is considered favorable. Conversely, NPV quantifies the value added by a project in monetary terms by subtracting the initial investment from the present value of future cash flows discounted at the required rate of return.

NPV is often deemed more reliable because it directly measures the expected increase in value and accommodates the magnitude and timing of cash flows, whereas IRR may give multiple values or be less accurate with non-conventional cash flows. Therefore, many organizations prefer NPV as it aligns more directly with shareholder wealth maximization.

Application of Simple Rate of Return in Capital Budgeting

The Simple Rate of Return (SRR), also known as the accounting rate of return, is calculated by dividing annual expected accounting income from the investment by the initial investment cost. Its ease of calculation has historically made it popular among many companies, particularly when quick assessments are needed without complex calculations. In a manufacturing firm I am familiar with, SRR was used to evaluate proposals for new machinery investments. For example, if a piece of equipment cost $100,000 and was expected to generate an annual accounting profit of $15,000, the SRR would be:

SRR = 15,000 / 100,000 = 15%

However, while SRR is straightforward, it ignores the time value of money and cash flow timing, which can lead to misleading decisions in comparison to IRR or NPV. Despite these limitations, SRR remains useful for initial screening to filter out less attractive options before conducting more detailed analyses.

Conclusion

Understanding the distinctions among IRR, NPV, and SRR is crucial for operational managers at EEC to make sound capital expenditures. While IRR provides a percentage rate of return, NPV emphasizes value creation, and SRR offers a quick, albeit simplistic, assessment. Training managers to interpret these metrics effectively supports strategic investment decisions that promote organizational growth and value maximization.

References

• Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2020). Principles of Corporate Finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2019). Corporate Finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Damodaran, A. (2015). Applied Corporate Finance: A User's Manual (3rd ed.). Wiley.
• Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of Financial Management (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001). The Effect of Managerial Incentives on Capital Investment and R&D Spending. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(1), 3-33.
• Rubinstein, M. (2019). The Use of Rate of Return as a Decision-Making Tool. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46(5-6), 678-698.
• Keown, A. J., Martin, J. D., & Petty, J. W. (2017). Financial Management: Principles and Applications (13th ed.). Pearson.
• Higgins, R. C. (2018). Analysis for Financial Management (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Lintner, J. (1965). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37.
• Ross, S. A., & Westerfield, R. W. (2019). Essentials of Corporate Finance (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.