Work Environment Assessment: No Matter What Type Of Nurse

Work Environment Assessmentno Matter What Type Of Nurse The Job Has I

Work environment assessments are essential tools for evaluating the professionalism, civility, teamwork, leadership, and overall health of a workplace, especially in demanding fields such as nursing. Clark (2015) defines a healthy work environment as one where a team collaborates effectively to achieve a common goal, individuals function at their highest potential, clear leadership roles are established, and civility is maintained. The Clark workplace environment assessment tool, comprising twenty questions rated on a scale from 1 to 5, assists organizations in evaluating these key aspects by summarizing responses into a category reflecting the environment's health.

In this paper, I evaluate an emergency department’s work environment based on recent personal experience during a travel nursing assignment. The organization received a grade of fifty on the assessment scale, indicating an unhealthy work environment characterized by significant issues related to incivility, poor leadership, and staff burnout. These findings are corroborated by Clark's (2015) criteria and reveal systemic organizational deficiencies that hinder staff well-being and patient safety.

Assessment of the Work Environment

Emergency departments are inherently high-stress and unpredictable settings, often making civility and professionalism challenging to uphold. However, despite the demanding environment, the organizational culture plays a crucial role in shaping staff experiences and perceptions of support and safety. In this specific setting, the assessment scoring a mere fifty highlighted serious concerns, primarily driven by organizational leadership’s neglect and the fostering of an uncivil climate.

The core issue identified was leadership’s consistent failure to address staff concerns over a period of nine months, despite repeated attempts by staff to escalate issues. These concerns largely revolved around patient safety and staff workload. The leadership’s inaction and dismissiveness created a sense of abandonment among nurses, leaving staff to rely solely on peer support. This situation was exacerbated when leadership refused to witness ongoing problems, citing COVID-19 fears as justification. Such actions demoralized staff and deepened the divide between management and frontline workers, culminating in high turnover and burnout (Clark, 2019).

Impacts of a Poor Work Environment

The ramifications of an unhealthy work environment extend beyond staff morale, directly impacting patient care and safety. Clark (2019) emphasizes that organizational disrespect and neglect can lead to increased stress, burnout, and diminished job satisfaction among nurses. These factors contribute to errors, compromised patient safety, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes. The afore-mentioned emergency department exemplifies this pattern, as the lack of leadership support has led to a deterioration of civility and professional standards.

The consequences also include a loss of experienced nurses, which diminishes team cohesion and continuity of care. The remaining staff faces increased workloads, heightening stress levels and the risk of mistakes. Burnout among nurses has been associated with decreased empathy, reduced patient satisfaction, and increased turnover, further destabilizing the work environment (Aiken et al., 2012). Such cycles lead organizations into a vicious cycle of decline, which is difficult to reverse without targeted interventions.

The Role of Leadership and Recommendations for Improvement

The evidence suggests that leadership is central to cultivating a civil, supportive, and effective work environment. Clark (2015) advocates for leaders to foster open communication, recognize staff achievements, and actively involve frontline workers in decision-making processes. Recognizing staff contributions can enhance morale and foster a sense of community and shared purpose. Moreover, leaders should prioritize addressing concerns promptly and transparently, demonstrating commitment to staff well-being and safety.

Implementing structured programs to promote civility is essential. Such programs may include training sessions on conflict resolution, stress management, and leadership development tailored specifically for healthcare settings. Encouraging a culture of mutual respect and accountability can diminish incivility and improve teamwork. Additionally, organizational policies should support reasonable workloads and ensure adequate staffing levels, aligning with the recommendations of Alam, Fozia, and Imlan (2021), who highlight that ethical leadership and civility significantly enhance organizational commitment and job satisfaction.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a healthy work environment in nursing is critical for ensuring quality patient care, reducing staff burnout, and maintaining organizational stability. The case study of the emergency department underscores the detrimental effects of poor leadership and uncivil practices, which collectively compromise safety and staff morale. To address these issues, organizations must recognize the importance of civility, foster transparent communication, and enact policies that promote respect and support for nurses. By doing so, healthcare institutions can improve job satisfaction, enhance patient safety, and foster a resilient, collaborative workplace culture.

References

• Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., et al. (2012). Hospital Nurse Staffing and Patient Mortality, Nurse Burnout, and Job Dissatisfaction. JAMA Internal Medicine, 172(4), 373–382.
• Alam, M., Fozia, G. U. L., & Imran, M. (2021). The impact of ethical leadership & civility on organizational commitment: The mediating role of work engagement. Journal of Arts & Social Sciences (JASS), 8(1), 45–59.
• Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23.
• Clark, C. M. (2019). Fostering a culture of civility and respect in nursing. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 10(1), 44–52.
• De Cieri, H., McNamara, M., & McCracken, M. (2013). Managing employee well-being: The role of leadership. Australian Journal of Management, 38(3), 371–392.
• Laschinger, H. K. S., & Fida, R. (2014). Psychological empowerment and perceivedorganizational support: Linking high-performance work systems to nurse

  job satisfaction and patient care quality. Journal of Nursing Administration, 44(4), 186–194.

• Nantsou, K., & Malliarou, M. (2020). The relationship between nurse leadership and workplace civility: A systematic review. Clinical Nursing Studies, 8(2), 1–10.
• Padma, S., & Surya, B. (2015). Impact of leadership style on employee performance: A study of Primary Health Center. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 40(4), 263–268.
• Williams, M. C., & Carter, P. A. (2020). The importance of civility in medical education and healthcare. Academic Medicine, 95(11), 1580–1583.
• World Health Organization. (2020). State of the world’s nursing report. Geneva: WHO Press.