Work Instructions: Download And Save A Copy Of The IOP Sampl

Work Instructions1download And Savea Copy Of The Iop Sample Work As

Work Instructions1download And Savea Copy Of The Iop Sample Work As

work instructions 1. Download and Save: a copy of the IOP sample work as a .docx, .doc, or pdf file using your first initial and last name. (Eg. ASmith IOP.docx) 2. Complete : 3B Title work and Introduction Worksheet 3. Submit: your completed worksheet into Moodle for grading.

4. Review Feedback: after your assignment is graded, log back into Moodle to review feedback left by the professor. 5. Update Sample work: After you have made any recommended revisions, update your personally named sample work with the completed work. Submission status Grading criteria RubricTitle work updated with correct information.

1 0 points 1 1 points 1 2 points Topic statement is included with relation to personal experiences stated. 2 0 points 2 1 points 2 2 points 2 3 points Statement of personal observation to broader psychological concepts not included. Key concepts clearly defined. 3 0 points 3 1 points 3 2 points 3 3 points 3 4 points 3 5 points Outline of work structure explained and includes key elements. 4 0 points 4 1 points 4 2 points 4 3 points 4 4 points 4 5 points Reference citations included both in-text and in the reference list with minimal or no errors. 5 0 points 5 1 points 5 2 points 5 3 points

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires downloading and saving a sample IOP (Interested in Other People) work document, completing a specified worksheet, and submitting it through Moodle. After receiving feedback, revisions should be made and the updated work resubmitted. The grading criteria include accurate inclusion of a topic statement related to personal experiences, clear definition of key psychological concepts, an outlined work structure with key elements, and correct citation of references both in-text and in the reference list.

In the context of psychological research and personal reflection, the IOP sample work serves as a foundational exercise to connect personal experiences with broader psychological theories and concepts. The process begins with downloading a template or sample document, which provides a structured guide to the assignment. Saving this sample with a personal filename—such as the student's initial and last name—ensures proper identification and organization.

Following the download and storage, the student must complete the designated worksheet, specifically the 3B Title work and Introduction Worksheet, which likely involves developing an appropriate title, stating a personal observation or experience, and linking it to broader psychological concepts. This requires introspection and the ability to articulate how personal experiences relate to established psychological theories, such as cognitive-behavioral models, developmental stages, or social influence processes.

Submission via Moodle prompts students to upload their completed worksheet by the deadline. After grading, it is essential to review the instructor’s feedback carefully. Feedback may include suggestions for clarifying statements, refining key concept definitions, or strengthening connections between personal observation and theoretical frameworks. Based on this input, students should revise their work and update the sample accordingly, ensuring the final submission reflects the improvements suggested by the instructor.

The grading rubric emphasizes several criteria: inclusion of a personal-topic statement, clear articulation of psychological concepts, organization of work structure, and accurate, minimal-error citation practices. These points collectively evaluate the student's ability to integrate personal reflection with scholarly research, establish clarity and coherence in their presentation, and properly attribute sources, thus demonstrating academic integrity and critical thinking skills.

In summary, this assignment aims to develop students' skills in personal reflection, theoretical application, academic writing, and proper citation. The iterative process of submitting, reviewing feedback, and revising promotes deeper understanding and mastery of psychological concepts while honing research and communication skills necessary for academic success.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
  • Brown, J. D. (2017). Social identity and personal experience: Psychological perspectives. Journal of Social Psychology, 157(4), 415-430.
  • Corey, G. (2016). Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. Cengage Learning.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The 'what' and 'why' of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
  • Gross, R., & McIlveen, P. (2014). Personal Development and Reflection in Psychology. Routledge.
  • Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2005). Metacognition: A foundation for learning and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 231–245.
  • Leary, M. R. (2010). Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior. Guilford Press.
  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.
  • Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and learning: Theory, research, and practice. Routledge.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Related Assignments