Workplace Safety Plan Worksheet HRM/420 University Of Phoeni

Question

Workplace Safety Plan Worksheet HRM/420 University of Phoeni Workplace Safety Plan Worksheet HRM/420 University of Phoenix Material: OSHA has cited your company, Smith & Baker Construction Co. (SBCC), in the past year for violations. SBCC operates in California, Arizona, and Nevada. The violations were: Andrew fell into an open excavation in California due to a failure to identify the hazard; Thomas fell from scaffolding during construction of a three-story office building in Arizona; Lindsay became ill from breathing toxic contamination while walking the work site in Nevada. For each individual (Andrew, Thomas, Lindsay), in no more than 175 words each: 1) Identify OSHA regulations or standards applicable to the scenario and describe how the regulation applies and was violated. 2) Describe ways to minimize the identified safety concerns. 3) Explain one or two workers' compensation issues under the applicable state laws you must address for each individual. 4) Describe ways to minimize the risk of employee injury to avoid future workers' compensation claims. Provide APA-formatted references.

Dr. Jack HW Helper · Accepted Answer

Executive Summary This analysis addresses three incidents at Smith & Baker Construction Co. (SBCC): (1) Andrew's excavation fall in California, (2) Thomas's scaffolding fall in Arizona, and (3) Lindsay's toxic exposure in Nevada. For each case I identify applicable OSHA standards, describe how they were violated, propose mitigation measures, explain workers' compensation issues under the relevant state systems, and recommend strategies to reduce future claims. The recommendations combine regulatory compliance, engineering and administrative controls, and claims-management best practices (OSHA, 2016; NIOSH, 2018). 1. Andrew — Excavation Fall (California) Applicable standards and violation: OSHA's excavation and trenching standard (29 CFR 1926 Subpart P) applies, including requirements for protective systems, sloping, benching, and competent person inspections (OSHA, n.d.-a). California OSHA enforces equivalent or stricter rules (Cal/OSHA, n.d.). The violation occurred because SBCC failed to identify the hazard and provide protective systems or a competent person inspection, exposing Andrew to a collapse/fall hazard (OSHA, n.d.-a; NIOSH, 2018). Mitigation: Implement written excavation procedures, designate and train a competent person to inspect daily and after events, use shoring/sloping/benching appropriate to soil type, install physical barriers and access ladders, and maintain emergency rescue plans (OSHA, n.d.-a; NIOSH, 2018). Conduct pre-task hazard analyses and include excavation checks in permits. Workers' compensation issues (California): California's Division of Workers' Compensation (DWC) requires prompt reporting and medical care; SBCC must report the injury to the DWC and its insurer, ensure timely medical treatment under state fee schedules, and preserve records for claims adjudication (California DWC, n.d.). Potential issues include permanent impairment ratings, temporary disability benefits, and claims for inadequate safety leading to penalties. Pr

Workplace Safety Plan Worksheet HRM/420 University Of Phoeni ✓ Solved

Workplace Safety Plan Worksheet HRM/420 University of Phoeni

Paper For Above Instructions

Executive Summary

1. Andrew — Excavation Fall (California)

2. Thomas — Fall from Scaffolding (Arizona)

3. Lindsay — Toxic Exposure (Nevada)

Integrated Recommendations

References