Write 201 Project 2: Communication Issue Spring 2016 Introdu ✓ Solved

Writ 201 Project 2 Communication Issuespring 2016introductionproject

Writ 201 Project 2: Communication Issue Spring 2016 Introduction Project 2 asks you to argue how your chosen discourse community deals with one “communication issue” in the profession. Learning Objectives (you should be able to…) • conduct Library database research and evaluate sources with moderate guidance • synthesize sources effectively to support an argument • use class readings to help identify and define your “communication issue” • apply this definition in your discussion of your field

Using the readings we have discussed together so far, define for yourself what a “communication issue” might be. For example, using Swales’ characteristics of discourse communities as a framework, a “communication issue” might be the absence of communication genres that reach new members; an example of a communication issue using Porter’s “intertextuality” as a framework might be the imported and repeated use of a problematic rhetorical strategy.

To make sure that your essay is an argument, and not a summary, you may choose to consider the following questions: Why does this issue exist? What rhetorical context created it? What about your field’s rhetorical context allows the issue to persist? What would need to change in order for this issue to be solved? Whose responsibility is it to solve the issue?

To articulate your argument, form your thesis around why or how this problem emerges in the communication of your field. You may choose a modality other than conventional essay. Consider a modality that is germane to the issue’s audience and context. For example, if you are arguing that one communication issue in Interior Design is the false promise of total renovation that accompanies the genre convention of before/after pictures on a firm’s website, you would likely include examples of before/after pictures; you may decide to experiment with a web essay that includes hyperlinks. Purpose and Audience The purpose of your project is to convince your readers (peers, me, others in your major) that this communication issue is significant, how it came to be, and how it could be explored further.

Essay Format · 7-10 pages, double-spaced, standard font · a thesis statement, body paragraphs that elaborate on the thesis, and a conclusion · MLA essay format, including a works cited page · at least 4 non-encyclopedia sources, including W/D, 1-2 sources from WAW, and 2-4 scholarly or professional sources. (You will likely use more than 4 sources.) -OR- meet with me to discuss a digital/online production of your argument with comparable length and requirements

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In contemporary discourse communities, effective communication is vital for success and growth. However, many communities face specific communication issues that hinder their development and integration of new members. This paper examines the communication issue of insufficient onboarding communication genres within the technical engineering community. The investigation reveals how this problem persists, its implications, and potential solutions for fostering more inclusive and effective communication strategies.

Understanding the Communication Issue

The primary communication issue within technical engineering discourse communities is the lack of structured genres that effectively introduce newcomers to core concepts, practices, and expectations. According to John Swales’ framework of discourse communities, a key feature is the presence of genres that facilitate participation (Swales, 1990). In the engineering context, this manifests as a scarcity of onboarding documents, tutorials, or mentorship communication that can reach and engage new members. As a result, newcomers often struggle to integrate smoothly, leading to decreased collaboration and knowledge transfer (Johnson & Smith, 2015).

The Rhetorical Context and Its Role

The continued existence of this communication issue stems from a combination of institutional culture, technological constraints, and traditional practices. The rapid evolution of engineering fields often emphasizes technical expertise over communication skills, which can diminish the perceived importance of onboarding genres. Furthermore, the competitive nature of industrial organizations fosters a culture of individual achievement rather than collaborative onboarding processes (Lee, 2018). The rhetorical context of industry standards and corporate priorities thus perpetuates the neglect of specialized communication genres aimed at integrating new members.

Implications and Persistence of the Issue

This communication gap impacts not only the efficiency of project execution but also the innovation potential within the community. New members who lack access to clear onboarding genres tend to experience frustration, misunderstandings, and reduced motivation (Miller & Roberts, 2019). Over time, the absence of effective communication genres hampers the community’s ability to adapt to technological changes and adopt best practices. The entrenched nature of organizational culture and resource constraints contribute to the issue’s persistence.

Proposed Solutions and Responsibilities

Addressing this issue requires a multi-level approach. Organizations must recognize the importance of genre-based communication strategies, investing in developing comprehensive onboarding materials, mentorship programs, and digital repositories of knowledge (Baker, 2020). Additionally, industry leaders and professional associations have a responsibility to set standards and promote best practices that prioritize inclusive communication. Educational institutions should also incorporate genre-awareness into engineering curricula, preparing future professionals to value and utilize effective onboarding communication genres.

Conclusion

The communication issue of inadequate onboarding genres within technical engineering communities persists due to cultural, institutional, and technological factors. Overcoming this challenge necessitates collective effort—organizationally, professionally, and educationally—to create and implement effective communication practices. By doing so, engineering discourse communities can foster more inclusive, efficient, and innovative environments that support the successful integration of new members and continuous growth.

References

• Baker, T. (2020). Enhancing onboarding with genre-based communication strategies. Journal of Technical Communication, 45(3), 112-128.
• Johnson, D., & Smith, R. (2015). Knowledge transfer in engineering communities: Challenges and solutions. Engineering Education Review, 12(4), 202-215.
• Lee, S. (2018). Organizational culture and communication practices in industry. Industrial Communication Journal, 33(2), 85-99.
• Miller, P., & Roberts, A. (2019). Failures in onboarding: Impact on retention and innovation. Journal of Organizational Development, 22(1), 50-65.
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.