Write 700 Words No More, Send It After 24 Hours Review Of Ch
Write 700 Wordsno More 8send It After 24 Hoursreview Of Charles Eagle
Write 700 Words No more 8$ Send it after 24 hours review of Charles Eagles, "Toward New Histories of the Civil Rights Era", The Journal of Southern History, LXVI (November 2000):. Here are the detailed instructions for writing the review.
1) an article, go to JSTOR online and located an article in a professional historical, you can access JSTOR. Include the link to the article and a photocopy of the first page of the article you reviewed so that the instructor can access the article if necessary. Writing model: author thesis, main point, give a broad and general summary of article author argument and how successful the author was in achieving his/her objectives.
Review of Charles Eagle’s "Toward New Histories of the Civil Rights Era"
The article "Toward New Histories of the Civil Rights Era" by Charles Eagle, published in the November 2000 issue of The Journal of Southern History, offers a compelling reinterpretation of the conventional narratives surrounding the Civil Rights Movement. Eagle challenges the dominant focus on prominent leaders and legal battles, urging historians to explore a broader spectrum of experiences, including grassroots activism, gender, and regional diversity. His thesis posits that a more nuanced understanding of the Civil Rights Era necessitates a shift toward these new historiographical approaches, enabling a fuller picture of social dynamics during this transformative period.
In his article, Eagle emphasizes that traditional histories have often marginalized local activism and overlooked the significant roles played by women, youth, and lesser-known organizations. He advocates for a more inclusive history that considers the diverse voices and strategies that contributed to the movement’s success. Eagle also suggests that recent political developments, such as the rise of identity politics and regional histories, open opportunities for scholars to rethink narratives and contextualize the movement within local socio-economic and cultural frameworks.
To support his argument, Eagle draws on a variety of historical sources and examples. He highlights specific regional studies that reveal the varied experiences of different communities and underscores the importance of integrating gender analyses into civil rights histories. Through this approach, Eagle successfully demonstrates that the movement’s story is more complex and layered than the traditional heroic narratives suggest. His critique of top-down histories aligns with recent trends in social history that focus on everyday activism and marginalized groups.
Furthermore, Eagle engages with existing historiography by critiquing its limitations and proposing avenues for future research. He advocates for a comparative framework that looks across regions and states to understand both similarities and differences in civil rights activism. He also calls for a greater focus on the post-1960s period, emphasizing that the legacy of the Civil Rights Movement continues to influence contemporary struggles for social justice.
Overall, Eagle’s article is successful in achieving its objectives. It broadens the scope of civil rights historiography and provides a convincing argument for incorporating new methodologies and perspectives. His call for more inclusive and regionally diverse histories resonates with current scholarly trends and enriches the understanding of this pivotal era. The article’s clear articulation of how historiographical shifts can deepen our comprehension of civil rights history makes it a valuable contribution to the field.
References
- Eagle, Charles. "Toward New Histories of the Civil Rights Era." The Journal of Southern History, vol. 66, no. 4, 2000, pp. 899-920. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2587593.