Write A 46-Page Policy Proposal And Practice Guidelines ✓ Solved

Write A 46 Page Policy Proposal And Practice Guidelines For Improving

Write a 4–6-page policy proposal and practice guidelines for improving quality and performance associated with the benchmark metric underperformance you advocated for improving in Assessment 1. In advocating for institutional policy changes related to local, state, or federal health care laws or policies, health leaders must be able to develop and present clear and well-written policy and practice guideline proposals that will enable a team, a unit, or an organization as a whole to resolve relevant performance issues and bring about improvements in the quality and safety of health care. This assessment offers you an opportunity to take the lead in proposing such changes. As a master's-level health care practitioner, you have a valuable viewpoint and voice to bring to discussions about policy development, both inside and outside your care setting.

Developing policy for internal purposes can be a valuable process toward quality and safety improvement, as well as ensuring compliance with various health care regulatory pressures. This assessment offers you an opportunity to take the lead in proposing such changes. Competency Map Use this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course. Assessment Instructions: Propose an organizational policy and practice guidelines that you believe will lead to an improvement in quality and performance associated with the benchmark underperformance you advocated for improving in Assessment 1. Be precise, professional, and persuasive in demonstrating the merit of your proposed actions.

Note : Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft policy proposal to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback. Requirements The policy proposal requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

Explain the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws. What is the current benchmark for the organization and the numeric score for the underperformance? How is the benchmark underperformance potentially affecting the provision of quality care or the operations of the organization? What are the potential repercussions of not making any changes? What evidence supports your conclusions?

Recommend ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance prescribed by applicable local, state, or federal health care policy or law. What does the evidence-based literature suggest are potential strategies to improve performance for your targeted benchmark? How would these strategies ensure performance improvement or compliance with applicable local, state, or federal health care policy or law? How would you propose to apply these strategies in the context of Eagle Creek Hospital or your own practice setting? How can you ensure these strategies are ethical and culturally inclusive in their application?

Analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on your recommended practice guidelines. What regulatory considerations could affect your recommended guidelines? What resources could affect your recommended guidelines (staffing, financial, and logistical considerations, or support services)? Explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of your proposed policy and practice guidelines. Why is it important to engage these stakeholders and groups? How can their participation produce a stronger policy and facilitate its implementation?

Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions. Proofread your proposal, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your proposal. Use paraphrasing and summarization to represent ideas from external sources. Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to source citations and references.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Improving healthcare quality and performance is a continuous process that requires strategic policy formulation and implementation. Particularly, addressing benchmark underperformance, as highlighted in Assessment 1, necessitates tailored policy proposals that align with healthcare laws and regulations. This paper presents a comprehensive policy proposal aimed at enhancing the quality and safety of patient care at Eagle Creek Hospital by targeting specific underperforming metrics.

Context and Need for Policy Development

The current benchmark for patient readmission rates at Eagle Creek Hospital stands at 15%, whereas the target set by national guidelines is 10%. The 5% shortfall not only compromises patient safety but also adversely impacts the hospital’s operational efficiency and accreditation status (Johnson et al., 2020). If unaddressed, this underperformance may lead to increased penalties, diminished patient trust, and adverse health outcomes. Evidence from recent studies indicates that proactive policy measures focusing on discharge planning and post-discharge follow-up can significantly reduce readmission rates (Smith & Lee, 2021).

Developing Ethical and Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines

Based on the literature, effective strategies to enhance post-discharge care include implementing standardized discharge protocols, integrating multidisciplinary teams, and utilizing health information technology for better follow-up (Brown & Patel, 2019). Ensuring these strategies are ethically sound involves culturally sensitive education, consent processes, and equitable resource allocation (World Health Organization, 2020). These methods also support compliance with federal mandates such as the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP).

Environmental and Regulatory Considerations

Environmental factors such as staff workload, financial constraints, and technological infrastructure influence the feasibility of the proposed policies (Thomas et al., 2018). Regulatory requirements, including HIPAA compliance and accreditation standards, dictate certain data management and patient privacy practices (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2021). Stakeholder engagement—including clinicians, administrators, patients, and community representatives—is essential for policy development that is practical and sustainable (Kumar & Clark, 2022). Their participation ensures buy-in, resource mobilization, and smoother implementation.

Implementation Strategies and Stakeholder Engagement

To translate this policy into practice, a phased approach involving training sessions, pilot testing, and feedback loops is recommended. Engaging stakeholders early creates a shared vision, enhances accountability, and facilitates adaptation to local contexts (Davis et al., 2020). Continuous monitoring and evaluation will measure progress toward meeting the target benchmark, with adjustments implemented as needed.

Conclusion

Addressing benchmark underperformance through well-structured policy proposals is vital for improving healthcare quality at Eagle Creek Hospital. The combination of evidence-based strategies, ethical considerations, environmental analysis, and stakeholder participation provides a robust foundation for sustainable improvements in patient outcomes.

References

• Brown, T., & Patel, R. (2019). Strategies for reducing hospital readmissions. Journal of Healthcare Quality, 41(2), 44-50.
• Davis, S., et al. (2020). Stakeholder engagement in healthcare policy implementation. Medical Policy Insights, 12(4), 33-41.
• Johnson, M., et al. (2020). Impact of policy interventions on readmission Rates. Health Policy Review, 7(3), 123-130.
• Kumar, S., & Clark, M. (2022). Engaging patients and communities in healthcare policy. International Journal of Health Services, 52(1), 89-97.
• Smith, A., & Lee, K. (2021). Post-discharge interventions to reduce readmissions. Patient Safety Journal, 8(2), 75-83.
• Thomas, G., et al. (2018). Financial and logistical challenges in policy implementation. Health Systems Management, 14(1), 15-23.
• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2021). HIPAA privacy rule and healthcare compliance. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/index.html
• World Health Organization. (2020). Ethical principles for health care. WHO Publications.