Write A 700 To 1050 Word Paper Describing Observation And Me

Writea 700 To 1050 Word Paper Describing Observation And Measurement

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper describing observation and measurement as they relate to human services research. Address each of the following points in your paper: Sampling. What is the purpose of sampling? What are the fundamentals of sampling? Give an example (identifying the characteristics) of one type of probability and nonprobability sampling presented in Ch. 6 of Applied Social Research. How can you avoid bias when selecting samples for human services research? Data Collection. Describe the scales of measurement used in research. What are the types of reliability? Provide examples of the types of reliability as they apply to human services research or to human services management research. What are the types of validity? Provide examples of these types of validity as they apply to human services research or to human services management research. Why is it important to ensure that data collection methods and instruments are both reliable and valid? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each of the following: Telephone surveys, online surveys, focus groups, surveys via websites? Which of the above examples of survey research would you prefer to use if you were collecting data, and why?

Paper For Above instruction

Observation and measurement are fundamental components of research in human services, providing the basis for gathering accurate information about individuals, groups, and social phenomena. Effective observation and measurement facilitate meaningful data collection, supporting evidence-based practices that improve service delivery and policy formulation. This paper explores the concepts of sampling, data collection, scales of measurement, reliability, and validity in the context of human services research, emphasizing their significance and application.

Sampling in Human Services Research

The purpose of sampling is to select a subset of individuals or units from a larger population in order to make inferences about the entire group. Sampling allows researchers to conduct studies efficiently and cost-effectively while maintaining a reasonable degree of accuracy. The fundamentals of sampling involve understanding the population, defining the sampling frame, and choosing an appropriate sampling method—either probability or nonprobability. Probability sampling ensures that every member of the population has a known chance of being selected, which supports generalizability. Nonprobability sampling, on the other hand, involves selecting participants based on subjective criteria, which may limit the extent to which findings can be generalized but is often used when probabilistic methods are impractical.

An example of probability sampling is simple random sampling, where each individual in the population has an equal chance of selection. For instance, in a study on housing stability among homeless individuals, researchers might randomly select participants from a list of registered homeless persons, ensuring each person has an equal chance of inclusion.

An example of nonprobability sampling is purposive sampling, where participants are selected based on specific characteristics relevant to the study. For example, when researching the experiences of parents with children with disabilities, researchers might intentionally select parents known to meet that criterion to gather targeted insights.

Avoiding Bias in Sample Selection

A key concern in human services research is avoiding bias during sample selection. Strategies include utilizing random sampling methods whenever possible, ensuring the sampling process is transparent, and avoiding self-selection biases that occur when participants volunteer themselves. Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria also help maintain objectivity. Additionally, researchers should strive to attain a representative sample that reflects the diversity of the population, which minimizes systematic errors and enhances the validity of inferences drawn from the data.

Data Collection and Measurement Scales

Data collection in human services research employs various scales of measurement, including nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio scales. Nominal scales categorize data without a quantitative value, such as gender or ethnicity. Ordinal scales rank data in order but do not specify the magnitude of differences, like levels of client satisfaction. Interval scales have equal intervals between measurements, as seen in test scores or temperature ratings, but lack a true zero point. Ratio scales have all properties of interval scales, including a meaningful zero, such as income level or number of therapy sessions attended.

Reliability in Human Services Research

Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of measurement instruments over time. Types include test-retest reliability, which assesses stability over time—if a survey measuring client stress is administered twice under similar conditions, consistent results indicate high test-retest reliability. Internal consistency evaluates the coherence of items within a measure; for example, a questionnaire on client well-being should produce consistent responses across its items. Inter-rater reliability examines the agreement between different observers or raters, crucial in observational assessments of client behavior in therapy settings.

Validity in Human Services Research

Validity concerns whether a measurement accurately captures the concept it aims to measure. Content validity ensures the instrument covers all relevant aspects of the construct; for instance, a survey measuring social support should encompass various support sources. Construct validity assesses whether the tool accurately measures theoretical constructs, such as measuring resilience through a series of related behaviors and attitudes. Criterion validity evaluates how well a measure correlates with an external criterion; for example, a new screening tool for depression should align with clinical diagnoses. Ensuring validity is critical to obtaining meaningful and trustworthy results.

The Importance of Reliability and Validity

Reliable and valid data collection instruments are vital because they ensure the accuracy and consistency of findings. Reliable tools produce consistent results across different contexts and times, while valid tools accurately measure the intended constructs. Without reliability and validity, research findings may be flawed, leading to incorrect conclusions that can adversely affect human services practices and policies. For example, invalid measurements of client satisfaction may underestimate or overestimate service effectiveness, impacting program improvement efforts.

Survey Methods: Advantages and Disadvantages

Telephone Surveys

Advantages include quick data collection, the ability to reach a geographically dispersed population, and cost-effectiveness. However, they face a decline in response rates due to caller ID and call screening, and may exclude populations without telephone access.

Online Surveys

Online surveys are convenient, allowing participants to respond at their own pace and place. They are also cost-efficient and easily scalable. Disadvantages include potential sampling bias toward individuals with internet access and technological literacy, which may exclude marginalized populations.

Focus Groups

Focus groups facilitate in-depth discussion and understanding of participant perspectives, providing rich qualitative data. On the downside, they are time-consuming, costly, and susceptible to groupthink, which can influence individual responses.

Surveys via Websites

Utilizing websites for surveys allows for targeted outreach and embedding surveys directly into online portals. Challenges involve ensuring security, managing response quality, and the potential for low engagement without proper incentives.

Preferred Method of Data Collection

If I were collecting data, I would prefer online surveys due to their scalability, cost-effectiveness, and convenience for participants. They accommodate a large volume of responses and can be easily tailored to specific demographic groups through targeted sampling strategies. While they may exclude certain populations, supplementing online surveys with other methods such as focus groups could mitigate this limitation and enhance data richness.

Conclusion

In sum, observation and measurement are essential in human services research for obtaining reliable and valid data. Proper sampling methods reduce bias and ensure representative samples. Understanding measurement scales, reliability, and validity enhances the quality of data collection instruments, leading to more accurate insights. The choice of survey methods must balance practicality, cost, and the target population, with online surveys standing out for their efficiency and scalability in the digital age.

References

• Babbie, E. (2010). The Practice of Social Research (12th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Fink, A. (2013). How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
• Salkind, N. J. (2010). Encyclopedia of Research Design. Sage Publications.
• Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Levin, K. A. (2006). Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 7(1), 24-25.
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2014). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Sage Publications.
• DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs. Houghton Mifflin.