Write A 750-1000 Word Analysis Of Fetal Abnormalities

Write A 750 1000 Word Analysis Of Case Study Fetal Abnormality Be

Write a word analysis of "Case Study: Fetal Abnormality." Be sure to address the following questions: Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? Explain. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendation for action? What theory do you agree with? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

Paper For Above instruction

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the case study involving fetal abnormality, focusing on the ethical theories and moral frameworks used by the key individuals—Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson—to assess the moral status of the fetus. Understanding the underlying moral theories guiding their decisions offers insight into their recommended courses of action and reveals personal and philosophical differences in ethical reasoning.

Moral Theories and Their Application in the Case Study

In analyzing their perspectives, it is essential to identify the primary moral theories influencing their decisions. The main theories likely at play include utilitarianism, deontological ethics, and virtue ethics, each offering distinct criteria for evaluating moral status and appropriate action.

Jessica’s Perspective: Utilitarianism in Focus

Jessica seems to advocate for a utilitarian approach, prioritizing the overall happiness and welfare of all affected parties. From a utilitarian standpoint, the moral worth of the fetus is assessed based on the potential consequences of continuing or terminating the pregnancy. Jessica might argue that if the fetus has a severe abnormality, and if its quality of life would be compromised, then terminating the pregnancy could maximize overall happiness by preventing suffering for the child and reducing emotional and financial burdens on the family. Her recommendation for action aligns with maximizing well-being, suggesting that termination may be morally justified if it results in greater net happiness.

Marco’s Viewpoint: Deontological Ethics and Moral Duties

Marco appears to lean toward a deontological framework, emphasizing moral duties and rights. For him, the fetus’s moral status might be ascribed based on intrinsic qualities or rights, such as the right to life. Under this view, regardless of the fetus's potential suffering or quality of life, the act of termination could be morally impermissible if it violates the fetus's right to life. Marco’s recommendation for action is likely based on respecting these rights, advocating for the protection of the fetus even amid severe abnormalities, emphasizing the moral duty to preserve life at all costs.

Maria’s Ethical Approach: Virtue Ethics and Moral Character

Maria’s stance might be rooted in virtue ethics, focusing on moral character, compassion, and practical wisdom. She argues from a perspective that considers the virtues exemplified in decision-making—such as compassion for the family’s suffering and prudence in making morally complex choices. Her assessment involves weighing virtues like benevolence, responsibility, and justice. Maria may favor a nuanced approach, supporting continued pregnancy if she perceives moral virtues supporting the acceptance of fetal abnormalities, or endorsing termination if compassion for the family’s plight outweighs other virtues.

Dr. Wilson’s Scientific and Ethical Integration

Dr. Wilson functions as a medical professional, blending scientific understanding with ethical reasoning. His decision-making might involve a primarily pragmatic or evidence-based perspective, considering the severity of abnormalities, prognosis, and medical implications. Ethically, he could be guided by principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, aiming to prevent harm while respecting patient autonomy. His recommendations would depend on medical facts, with ethical reasoning modulating based on the circumstances and the patients’ wishes.

Influence of Theories on Recommendations for Action

The differing theories directly influence each individual's recommendations. Jessica’s utilitarian view supports termination if it alleviates suffering and maximizes happiness, while Marco’s deontological duty to preserve life leads him to oppose termination regardless of suffering. Maria’s virtue ethics encourages a balanced, compassionate approach, which might lead to negotiations or a case-by-case decision. Dr. Wilson’s synthesis of science and ethics might result in recommendations grounded in clinical prognosis and respecting parental authority.

Personal Alignment with a Moral Theory

Of these philosophies, I am inclined toward a utilitarian approach, as it emphasizes the tangible outcomes and overall well-being. In the context of fetal abnormalities, I believe that considering the potential quality of life and minimizing suffering provides a pragmatic and compassionate framework. Utilitarianism allows for flexible, context-sensitive decisions that can adapt to the complexities inherent in fetal anomalies, aligning moral judgments with real-world consequences.

Application of the Chosen Theory to Recommendations

Using utilitarianism as the guiding principle, the decision to recommend termination would hinge on whether the fetus’s quality of life would be severely compromised and whether continuation would result in more suffering than benefit. If medical evidence indicates a profound abnormality likely to cause significant suffering or an unviable life, then terminating the pregnancy maximizes overall happiness by preventing future suffering. Conversely, if the prognosis is relatively mild and the potential for a meaningful life exists, the utilitarian approach might respect life and support continuation, considering the potential for happiness and fulfillment.

Conclusion

The case study demonstrates how different ethical frameworks shape moral judgments and influence actions regarding fetal abnormalities. Utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics each offer unique perspectives, emphasizing outcomes, moral duties, or virtues, respectively. Personally, I favor utilitarianism for its pragmatic flexibility and focus on outcomes that promote well-being. Ethical decision-making in complex cases like fetal abnormalities benefits from a nuanced understanding of these theories, balancing scientific facts, moral values, and compassionate considerations.

References

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Gert, B. (2018). The Definition of Morality. Issues in Ethics, 31(2), 1-9.
  • Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
  • Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
  • Rachels, J. (1986). The Elements of Moral Philosophy. McGraw-Hill.
  • Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Thomson, J. J. (1971). A Defense of Abortion. The Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(1), 47-66.
  • Wilkinson, S. (2003). Embryo Ethics. Oxford University Press.
  • Becker, L. C. (2011). Ethical and Legal Issues in Medical Practice. Elsevier.
  • Fletcher, R. (1966). Situation Ethics: The New Morality. Westminster John Knox Press.

Related Assignments