Write A Paper Describing Knowledge, Skills, Or Theories ✓ Solved

Write a paper describing how the knowledge, skills, or theor

Write a paper describing how the knowledge, skills, or theories of this course have been applied or could be applied in a practical manner to your current work environment. If you are not currently working, describe how you could leverage the knowledge gained working as an IT consultant for an organization of your choice. This paper should be written for the Clouding Computing class learning experience. Provide a 500-word paper (about 2 or more pages double spaced, not counting the title and reference pages). Include a title page, body pages, and reference page. An abstract and introduction are not required. Use correct APA guidelines for sources and citations; any outside resources must be properly cited. Do not use a previously written paper for another class.

Paper For Above Instructions

Title Page

Title: Applying Cloud Computing Knowledge as an IT Consultant

Author: [Student Name]

Course: Clouding Computing

Date: [Date]

Applying Course Knowledge to a Practical IT Consulting Engagement

This paper explains how the knowledge, skills, and theories learned in the Clouding Computing course can be applied practically in an IT consulting role for a medium-sized healthcare organization seeking to modernize its infrastructure. The organization must address regulatory compliance (HIPAA), improve scalability for fluctuating workloads, reduce capital expenditures, and increase operational resilience. The course’s core topics—cloud service models (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS), virtualization, containers, infrastructure-as-code (IaC), security frameworks, cost management, and cloud governance—provide a framework for a comprehensive migration and operational plan (Mell & Grance, 2011; Armbrust et al., 2010).

Assessment and Planning

Applying course methodologies, the engagement begins with a discovery and risk assessment using NIST and industry best practices (Mell & Grance, 2011). Inventorying applications, data sensitivity, and workload patterns allows selection of suitable cloud models: lift-and-shift for legacy applications using IaaS, refactoring for PaaS benefits where appropriate, and adopting SaaS for non-core functions (Armbrust et al., 2010; Buyya et al., 2009). Business drivers—cost, compliance, and scalability—are mapped to technical requirements to produce a phased migration roadmap (Marston et al., 2011).

Architecture and Design

Using principles from the course, I would design a hybrid cloud architecture that maintains sensitive patient records on a HIPAA-compliant private cloud or encrypted storage in a vetted public cloud, while shifting non-sensitive workloads to public cloud services for cost and elasticity advantages (Hashizume et al., 2013). The architecture includes microservices and containerization (e.g., Docker + Kubernetes) for portability and faster release cycles, and IaC (Terraform/CloudFormation) to ensure repeatable, auditable deployments (Erl, Puttini, & Mahmood, 2013; Kavis, 2014).

Security, Compliance, and Governance

Security lessons from the course guide implementation of identity and access management (IAM), network segmentation, encryption at rest and in transit, and continuous monitoring using a security operations center (SOC) approach (Cloud Security Alliance, 2017). Compliance mapping (HIPAA) is incorporated into the design via technical and administrative controls; automated compliance checks and logging feed into SIEM tools to provide evidence for audits (Hashizume et al., 2013).

Operational Practices and DevOps

The course’s DevOps and automation concepts are applied to reduce lead time for changes and improve reliability. CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, and blue-green deployments minimize downtime and enable rapid iteration while maintaining a strong rollback strategy (Rimal, Choi, & Lumb, 2011). Observability—metrics, tracing, and centralized logging—supports service-level objectives and incident response (Buyya et al., 2009).

Cost Management and Business Impact

Knowledge of cloud pricing models permits optimization: rightsizing instances, using reserved instances or savings plans for steady-state workloads, and autoscaling for variable demand to control costs (Marston et al., 2011). A TCO and ROI analysis projects capital expenditure reductions and operational savings; combined with faster time-to-market for new features, this supports an executive business case for migration (Armbrust et al., 2010).

Risk Mitigation and Business Continuity

The course emphasized disaster recovery planning and multi-region redundancy. For the healthcare client, critical systems are deployed across availability zones with automated backups and tested recovery procedures. Regular DR rehearsals and runbooks minimize RTO/RPO to meet clinical continuity requirements (Erl et al., 2013).

Practical Example: Phased Implementation

  1. Phase 1: Discovery, dependency mapping, and pilot migration of non-critical workloads to public cloud.
  2. Phase 2: Re-platforming internal applications to containerized services and implementing CI/CD pipelines.
  3. Phase 3: Migration of non-sensitive production systems, IAM hardening, and cost optimization.
  4. Phase 4: Full governance rollout, compliance auditing automation, and DR validation.

Each phase uses measurable KPIs—deployment frequency, mean time to recovery, cost per transaction—to evaluate success and guide adjustments (Kavis, 2014; Cloud Security Alliance, 2017).

Conclusion

The Clouding Computing course provides both theoretical frameworks and practical skills that map directly to modern IT consulting engagements. From architecture and security to DevOps and cost governance, the course material enables a consultant to design, implement, and operate cloud solutions that address technical constraints and business goals. Applying these concepts to a healthcare client demonstrates tangible benefits: improved scalability, stronger compliance posture, reduced costs, and greater agility—outcomes supported by industry research and best practices (Armbrust et al., 2010; Mell & Grance, 2011).

References

  • Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., ... & Zaharia, M. (2010). A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50-58.
  • Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST definition of cloud computing (NIST Special Publication 800-145). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  • Buyya, R., Yeo, C. S., & Venugopal, S. (2009). Market-oriented cloud computing: Vision, hype, and reality for delivering IT services as computing utilities. In 2008 10th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications (pp. 5-13).
  • Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., & Ghalsasi, A. (2011). Cloud computing — The business perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 176-189.
  • Hashizume, K., Rosado, D. G., Fernández-Medina, E., & Fernandez, E. B. (2013). An analysis of security issues for cloud computing. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 4(1), 1-13.
  • Erl, T., Puttini, R., & Mahmood, Z. (2013). Cloud Computing: Concepts, Technology & Architecture. Prentice Hall.
  • Cloud Security Alliance. (2017). Security Guidance for Critical Areas of Focus in Cloud Computing v4.0. Cloud Security Alliance.
  • Kavis, M. J. (2014). Architecting the Cloud: Design Decisions for Cloud Computing Service Models (SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS). Wiley.
  • Rimal, B. P., Choi, E., & Lumb, I. (2011). A taxonomy and survey of cloud computing systems. In 2009 Fifth International Joint Conference on INC, IMS and IDC (pp. 44-51).
  • Amazon Web Services. (2019). AWS Well-Architected Framework. Amazon Web Services, Inc.

Related Assignments