Write A Paper Reflecting On The Negotiation Experience

Write A Paper That Reflects Upon the Experience Of Negotiating Based

Write a paper that reflects upon the experience of negotiating, based upon your experience with the Negotiation Project #2 and its outcomes. Include a discussion of ethics, face-saving and emotions in your reflection.

Paper For Above instruction

Negotiation is a fundamental aspect of human interaction and conflict resolution, requiring not only strategic thinking but also emotional intelligence and ethical considerations. Reflecting upon my experience with Negotiation Project #2, I recognize that the process was an enlightening journey that exposed me to the complexities of negotiation, the importance of understanding underlying interests, and the influence of emotions and ethics in shaping outcomes.

The negotiation scenario involved a dispute between a coat owner and a dry cleaning store owner over damages incurred to a garment. The owner of the coat claimed that the coat was returned in a worse condition than it was when brought in, specifically citing the shrunk lining as evidence of negligence. Conversely, the dry cleaner asserted that they followed proper procedures and blamed the damage on the coat’s inferior manufacturing quality. This situation presented an intricate web of interests, ethics, and emotional factors that had to be navigated carefully.

One of the key elements of the negotiation was the ethical consideration. As I prepared, I had to evaluate the ethics around honesty, responsibility, and fairness. The coat owner believed that the dry cleaner was negligent and should bear responsibility for the damage, aligning with a moral stance that businesses must be accountable for damages caused under their care. The dry cleaner’s perspective was that they adhered to standard procedures and that the damage was unavoidable due to the coat’s fabric quality. This difference highlighted the ethical challenge: whether to accept responsibility or defend the integrity of their procedures. In reflecting on this, I realized that maintaining ethical integrity is crucial in negotiations because it influences long-term relationships and reputation.

Face-saving and emotions played pivotal roles during the negotiation. The coat owner was visibly frustrated and felt that she was being unfairly treated and blamed for the damage. Her desire to have the coat replaced was intertwined with her need to preserve her dignity and trust in the dry cleaner. The dry cleaner, on the other hand, appeared defensive and concerned about their professional reputation. Recognizing these emotional undercurrents was vital, as it affected how arguments were presented and received. I learned that acknowledging emotions, such as frustration and concern, can help de-escalate tension and foster a more cooperative atmosphere.

Throughout the negotiation, I employed active listening, empathy, and ethical reasoning to navigate these sensitive issues. I aimed to address the interests behind the positions. For the coat owner, the primary interest was to replace or repair the damaged coat, restoring her sense of fairness and trust. My focus was on legitimizing her claims with documented evidence, such as receipts and care instructions, to build credibility. For the dry cleaner, interests included maintaining their professional reputation, avoiding financial loss, and upholding their standards of service. Recognizing these interests allowed me to propose alternatives, such as partial reimbursement, repairs, or providing additional cleaning services, which could meet mutual needs without compromising ethics.

My experience reaffirmed the importance of ethical conduct and emotional awareness. I recognized that negotiations are not solely about demands and concessions; they are profoundly linked to the emotions of the parties involved. By establishing trust and showing respect, I was able to foster a cooperative environment. For example, I acknowledged the dry cleaner's point of view and expressed understanding of their position, which helped in reducing defensiveness. Simultaneously, I maintained transparency and honesty about my client’s expectations and evidence, aligning with ethical principles of fairness and responsibility.

In terms of outcomes, I learned that ethical negotiation involves balancing the interests and emotions of all parties while adhering to moral standards. It encourages creative problem-solving, such as suggesting solutions that satisfy underlying interests rather than positions alone. The process also highlighted the importance of face-saving strategies—such as framing proposals to preserve dignity—which significantly influence the willingness of parties to reach an agreement.

My reflection leads me to conclude that effective negotiation requires not just technical skills but also an ethical framework and emotional sensitivity. By respecting the other party's interests and emotions, and by maintaining integrity, negotiators can achieve more sustainable and satisfactory outcomes. The experience has increased my awareness of the nuanced dynamics present in real-world disputes and has reinforced the value of patience, empathy, and ethics in achieving resolution.

References

  • Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin.
  • Shell, G. R. (2006). Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People. Penguin.
  • Thompson, L. (2015). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Pearson.
  • Raiffa, H., Richardson, J., & Metcalfe, D. (2002). Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Harvard University Press.
  • Leung, K., & Lai, C. (2019). Negotiation ethics: Applying moral principles in negotiation processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 411-422.
  • Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18(3), 213-231.
  • Pinkley, R., & Northcraft, G. (2010). Negotiation face: The influence of face on conflict resolution. Negotiation Journal, 26(2), 123-136.
  • De Dreu, C. K., & Beersma, B. (2015). Conflict in organizations: An integrative perspective. Routledge.
  • Gulati, R., & Kraimer, M. (2004). The dark side of social capital. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 491-512.
  • Malhotra, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). Negotiation genius: How to overcome obstacles and achieve brilliant results at the bargaining table and beyond. Bantam Books.

Related Assignments