Write An Informal Narrative About Your Composing Process

Write an Informal Narrative about your composing process

Write an informal narrative about "some" composing process of yours. Essentially, you will write a Reflective Self-Evaluation of yourself as a college writer. What exactly does that mean? It requires you to:

• look back over a recently completed process
• think reflectively about that process
• critically evaluate what went well, what didn’t go well, or what you might have done differently

As the aforementioned examples suggest, reflective writing is writing that describes, explains, interprets, and evaluates any past performance, action, belief, feeling, or experience. To reflect is to turn or look back, to reconsider something in the past from the perspective of the present. So, in your final essay, you will reflect and make an evaluation of your experience in this course. Remember, reflection involves multiple angles of vision. Just as light waves are thrown or bent back from the surface of a mirror, so, too, reflective writing throws our experience, action, or performance back to us, allowing us to see differently. We view the past from the angle of the present, what was from the angle of what could have been or what might be.

Multiplying your angle of vision through reflection often yields new insights and more complicated (complex) understanding of the issue on which you are reflecting. Professors generally look for four kinds of knowledge in reflective self-evaluation essays: self-knowledge, content knowledge, rhetorical knowledge, and critical knowledge (aka judgment). Following are ideas for each of these types of knowledge, which may be used to generate ideas for your essay. Choose only a few of the questions to respond to, questions that allow you to explain and demonstrate your most important learning for the course. You may write about your composing process for academic papers or creative genres or a combination of both.

Reflect as thoroughly as possible upon your writing process and explain it. Your narrative should include whatever you DO when you write, as well as whatever you DO when you compose. Composing should be understood in the broad sense, i.e. composing goes on in your mind when you are cleaning your refrigerator, mowing your grass, etc. It also occurs when you are researching, taking notes, or procrastinating. In essence you are NEVER NOT composing something.

So the key to your reflections is to include everything you do that makes a difference in your writing, from having to use a certain pen, to listening to music or sitting in the library. Both your formal and informal processes impact the way you produce a written work, if you use a formal method of note taking or outlining, if you compose on the computer or with pen and paper explore any and all of these activities that are helpful to you in your process. Explore all possible aspects that apply. This is a useful exercise for now and for you to revisit and revise in the future as you grow and become more comfortable writing. It is, in the end, for your benefit.

Self-Knowledge. Self-knowledge involves your understanding of how you are developing as a writer. Think about the writer you were, are, or hope to be. You can also contemplate how the subjects you have chosen to write about (or the way you have approached your subjects) relate to you personally beyond the scope of your papers. · What knowledge of myself as a writer have I gained from the writing I did in this course? · What changes, if any, have occurred in my writing practices or my sense of myself as a college writer? · What patterns can I identify between the ways I approached one writing assignment versus another? · How can I best illustrate and explain the self-knowledge I have gained through reference to specific writing assignments?

Content Knowledge. Content knowledge refers to what you have learned by writing about various subjects. It also includes the intellectual work that has gone into the writing and the insights gained from considering multiple points of view and from grappling with your own conflicting ideas. Perhaps you have grasped ideas about your subjects that you have not shown in your papers. · What kinds of complexities did I wrestle with this semester? · What new perspectives did I gain about particular subjects from my considerations of multiple or alternate points of view? · What new ideas or perspectives did I gain that may not be evident in the essays themselves? · What passages from various essays best illustrate the critical thinking I did in my writing assignments for this course?

Rhetorical Knowledge. Rhetorical knowledge focuses on your awareness of your rhetorical decisions—how your contemplation of purpose, audience, and genre affected your choices about content, structure, and style. · What important rhetorical choices did I make in various essays to accomplish my purpose or to appeal to my audience? What passages from my essays best illustrate these choices? Which of these choices is particularly effective and why? About which choices am I uncertain and why? · What have I learned about the rhetorical demands of audience, purpose, and genre, and how has that knowledge affected my writing and reading practices? · How do I expect to use this learning in the future?

Critical Knowledge or Judgment. Critical knowledge concerns your awareness of significant strengths and weaknesses in your writing. This area also encompasses your ability to identify what you like or value in various pieces of writing and to explain why. · Of all the papers I wrote this semester, which is the best and why? Which is the worst and why? · How has my ability to identify strengths and weaknesses changed during this course? · What role has peer, instructor, or other reader feedback had on the way I assess my work? · What improvements would I make to my papers if I had more time? · How has my writing changed over the semester? What new abilities will I take away from this course? · What are the most important things I still have to work on as a writer? · What is the most important thing I have learned in this course?

Paper For Above instruction

In this reflective self-evaluation essay, I will examine my personal writing process and growth as a college writer over the course of the semester. This reflection will encompass various aspects, including my approach to writing, the challenges I faced, the strategies I employed, and the insights I gained about my own development.

Initially, my understanding of myself as a writer was limited. I used to believe that writing was primarily about putting words on paper following a set structure. However, through this course, I have come to recognize that writing is a dynamic and ongoing process involving much more than just the final product. I now understand that composing occurs not only during formal writing sessions but also during everyday activities such as researching, note-taking, and even procrastinating. For example, I often find that my best ideas come when I am engaged in routine tasks, which prompts me to carry a notebook or voice recorder to capture my thoughts. This expanded view of composing has enhanced my ability to generate ideas and manage my writing projects more effectively.

Reflecting on my self-knowledge, I realize that my confidence as a writer has increased over the semester. Early on, I was hesitant to take risks with my writing or explore complex ideas, fearing that I might fail or produce subpar work. However, constructive feedback from my instructor and peers helped me recognize my strengths, such as my ability to articulate personal perspectives and my dedication to revising my drafts. As a result, I have become more willing to experiment with different styles and approaches, which has broadened my writing capabilities. One specific assignment that exemplifies this growth is my critical analysis paper, where I challenged myself to synthesize multiple viewpoints and develop a nuanced argument.

Regarding content knowledge, I have learned to grapple with complex ideas and present multiple perspectives within my writing. For instance, in my argumentative essays, I often considered counterarguments to strengthen my position. This practice has deepened my understanding of the topics I explored, such as the ethics of social media use and environmental sustainability. Through this process, I gained insights into how different viewpoints can coexist and how to communicate them effectively. One passage from my essay on social media ethics illustrates this critical thinking: I discussed the potential harms and benefits associated with social media platforms, demonstrating my ability to evaluate contrasting evidence thoughtfully.

My rhetorical awareness has also improved. I now pay closer attention to my purpose, audience, and genre when composing. For example, in my personal narrative, I aimed to connect emotionally with my readers, using a conversational tone and vivid descriptions. Conversely, in formal essays, I adopted a more scholarly style, integrating evidence and maintaining objectivity. Recognizing these rhetorical choices has helped me tailor my writing to suit different contexts. A key lesson I have learned is that understanding your audience significantly influences your language, tone, and evidence selection, which I plan to apply in future writing tasks.

In terms of critical judgment, I can now better evaluate my work and identify areas for improvement. My best paper was my research paper on climate change, where I integrated credible sources and provided a comprehensive analysis. Conversely, my early drafts of narratives lacked focus and detail, which I improved through revision and feedback. I have also learned the importance of peer review, as constructive criticism provides new perspectives and helps me refine my work. Moving forward, I recognize that I need to work on developing better outlines before writing and managing my time more effectively to produce polished drafts.

Overall, this course has significantly transformed my understanding of writing. I now see myself as a more confident, strategic, and reflective writer. I am proud of my progress in analyzing complex ideas, adapting rhetorical strategies, and embracing revision as a vital part of the process. The most important lesson I take away is the value of self-assessment and continual growth. I look forward to applying these insights in future academic and professional writing endeavors, continually refining my skills and expanding my perspectives.

References

• Bartholomae, D. (1986). Inventing the university. Journal of Basic Writing, 5(1), 4-23.
• Elbow, P. (1998). Writing without teachers. Oxford University Press.
• Harris, M. (2015). Rewriting: How to do things with texts. Routledge.
• Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and academic writing in the post-process era. Language Teaching, 37(2), 97-115.
• Lunsford, A, & Ruszkiewicz, J. J. (2013). Everything's an argument. Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Peha, S. (2003). Teaching argument in the digital age. The Clearing House, 77(4), 147-149.
• Ramage, J. D., & Bean, J. C. (2014). The Allyn & Bacon guide to writing. Pearson.
• Singleton, D., & Linton, C. (2006). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. John Wiley & Sons.
• Wallace, M. J. (2004). Critical thinking: An exploration of theory and practice. Routledge.
• Yancey, K. B. (2004). Written communication—Reflective writing. Routledge.