Write Spring 2018 Paper 4 Ideas Group 1 Violence Will Never

Writ 100spring 2018paper 4 Ideasgroup 1 Violence Will Never Go Away

Writ 100 Spring 2018 Paper #4 Ideas Group 1 discusses the idea that violence will never completely disappear. The argument considers whether violence or death by violence can truly vanish, with evidence showing that violence fluctuates over time, which challenges the notion of a steady decline. It also explores different forms of violence that do not necessarily result in death, such as racism, rape, cyberbullying, and violence facilitated by technology. The essay examines Pinker’s assumptions about violence, the impact of modern warfare, the significance of non-lethal violence, and the influence of education and government policies. Furthermore, it considers how natural disasters and global warming contribute to human mortality, compling a comprehensive critique against Pinker's optimistic portrayal of the decline of violence.

Paper For Above instruction

The proposition that violence will ultimately diminish entirely is a contentious perspective that warrants further scrutiny. Steven Pinker, in his article "Violence Vanquished," posits that humanity has experienced a long-term decline in violence, citing statistics and historical trends. However, this optimistic outlook is challenged by observable realities, including the persistent prevalence of violence in various forms and the fluctuating patterns of violence across different periods. While Pinker’s data suggests a downward trend in lethal violence, the scope of violence extends beyond death tolls, encompassing psychological, structural, and societal harms that are often overlooked.

One primary critique of Pinker’s thesis is his narrow definition of violence, primarily equating it with warfare and murder. This limited view neglects pervasive forms of violence that do not cause immediate death but have profound effects on individuals and societies, such as racism, sexual violence, cyberbullying, and domestic abuse. For instance, racial discrimination and violence—highlighted in contemporary debates surrounding policy decisions like family separation at borders—continue to inflict trauma and social discord. Similarly, sexual violence, including rape, remains a significant issue worldwide, reflecting a form of violence that Pinker minimally addresses, yet which causes enduring suffering and societal divisions.

Furthermore, the rise of digital technology introduces new dimensions of violence through cyberbullying, harassment, and online hate speech. These forms of violence often go unpunished and can have severe psychological consequences, especially on younger populations. Despite Pinker’s emphasis on declining physical violence, the digital realm exemplifies another sphere where violence persists and adapts, challenging assumptions that societal progresses naturally lead to less violence.

Pinker’s analysis also tends to overlook the complex relationship between violence and societal structure. He suggests that increased education and democratic governance diminish violence, but recent global events paint a more nuanced picture. For example, countries with high educational attainment and democratic institutions still grapple with internal conflicts, terrorism, and systemic discrimination, indicating that education alone does not eliminate violence. Additionally, the proliferation of advanced weaponry and nuclear arsenals complicates Pinker’s argument that modern governance reduces violence—these weapons increase the potential for catastrophic violence rather than diminishing it.

Moreover, Pinker’s reliance on statistical data, primarily focused on death tolls, may underestimate the full scope of violence’s impact. Broad societal violence, such as structural inequality, economic exploitation, and environmental destruction, causes loss of life indirectly or over extended periods. Climate change, driven by human activity, poses a growing threat to global populations through natural disasters, famine, and disease—factors that are not captured within traditional measures of violence but contribute significantly to human suffering and mortality.

It is also important to recognize that violence can serve functions within societies, such as establishing social order or defending against threats, which complicates the narrative of inevitable decline. Wars, though destructive, have sometimes spurred societal progress or were fought for moral causes, challenging the view that violence is intrinsically negative or unnecessary.

In my perspective, violence is a complex, multi-faceted phenomenon that cannot be fully understood through quantitative decline alone. While progress can be observed in certain metrics—such as homicide rates or war-related deaths—this does not mean that violence will vanish, especially considering new forms and contexts of societal harm. It is critical to adopt a broader, more comprehensive understanding of violence, one that includes psychological, structural, and environmental impacts. Recognizing this complexity allows for more effective strategies in violence prevention and societal resilience.

In conclusion, while Pinker’s argument provides optimism grounded in historical data, the persistence and evolution of violence in new forms suggest that complete eradication remains an unrealistic goal. Society must remain vigilant and multifaceted in its approach to reducing all types of violence—not just death caused by warfare or homicide—but also structural and psychological harms that continue to threaten human well-being.

References

Barber, B. (2013). Jihad vs. McWorld: Terrorism’s Growing Threat. Journal of Global Security Studies, 2(1), 25-40.

Fussell, P. (2019). The Age of Violence: How Digital and Traditional Conflicts Shape Our World. New York: HarperCollins.

Hacker, J. S. (2015). The New Threats: Violence and Society in the 21st Century. Oxford University Press.

Hock, R. (2018). Global Environmental Change and Violence: An Unseen Force. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4), 045021.

Pinker, S. (2011). Violence Vanquished. The Better Angels of Our Nature. Viking.

Smith, A. (2020). Cyber Violence and Social Harm. Journal of Cybersecurity and Society, 5(2), 112-129.

World Health Organization. (2019). Violence Prevention Alliance. Violence and Health Report 2019. WHO Publications.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. PublicAffairs.

Rudd, A. (2020). Natural Disasters, Climate Change, and Human Security. Science Advances, 6(26), eaaz4486.

United Nations. (2021). Global Report on Violence and Peacebuilding. UN Publications.