Writing Assignment 2a: The Stamp Act Resolutions And Declara

Writing Assignment 2a The Stamp Act Resolutions And Declaratory Act

Review the relevant sections in Chapter 6. Read the following documents: Document 1: The Stamp Act Resolutions; Document 2: The Declaratory Act of 1766. Examine each document to identify and understand the line of argument presented by the colonists and Parliament, including how each statement supports their respective positions. Analyze the tone and implications of the Declaratory Act, focusing on the relationship between the British crown and the colonies, and their respective enforcement approaches. Prepare a well-organized essay of at least 700 words that discusses the main arguments made by the colonists to Parliament, how these are supported by their resolutions, and how these reflect colonial attitudes toward local governance developed during the previous century. Additionally, examine how Parliament refutes the American claims and how the Declaratory Act embodies the British view of empire, contrasting with the colonists’ perspectives.

Paper For Above instruction

The period following the French and Indian War marked a turning point in colonial-British relations, characterized by increasing tensions over governance, taxation, and ideological sovereignty. The colonists articulated their stance through the Stamp Act Resolutions of 1765, asserting their rights as British subjects while challenging Parliament’s authority to impose taxes without colonial representation. Conversely, Parliament’s response, encapsulated in the Declaratory Act of 1766, reaffirmed its absolute authority over the colonies, emphasizing the supremacy of the crown and Parliament’s right to legislate for the territories in all cases.

The Stamp Act Resolutions, drafted by the Stamp Act Congress, articulate a clear position that underscores the colonists’ belief in their rights as Englishmen. The resolutions argue that without the colonies’ consent, Parliament has no authority to impose internal taxes, emphasizing that taxation should not be based solely on the Parliament’s assertion of sovereignty. The colonists insist upon their rights to be represented in the legislative process, asserting that only their elected assemblies can levy taxes or impose duties. They affirm their loyalty to the crown but insist that their rights as British subjects should not be infringed upon by legislative acts that lack their consent. This line of reasoning highlights a fundamental principle: that their rights as Englishmen—such as the right to be taxed only by their elected bodies—must be respected, and any attempt to override these rights constitutes tyranny.

Supporting these arguments, the resolutions refer to centuries of tradition and prior instances where the colonies' rights were acknowledged or protected. They point to the long-standing British practice of granting assemblies the authority to tax the colonies, emphasizing that they have fulfilled their obligations as colonial subjects. The colonists appeal to principles of natural rights and the rule of law, positioning their resistance as a defense of legal and historical rights rather than rebellion. Their argument reflects a pattern of asserting local autonomy within the framework of loyalty to the British Crown, rooted in a longstanding understanding of constitutional rights that had evolved over the previous century.

In response, Parliament’s Declaratory Act of 1766 refutes these claims with a tone emphasizing supremacy and absolute authority. The Act declares “that Parliament.. has the full power and authority to make laws and statutes” for the colonies “in all cases whatsoever,” including taxation. It dismisses the colonists’ argument for representative taxation as irrelevant, asserting that the colonies are subordinate to the authority of Parliament and the crown. This language underscores a fundamental divergence in views of empire: whereas colonists view the relationship as one of shared rights and justified local representation, Parliament perceives the colonies as subordinate territories lacking any independent legislative authority apart from the imperial government.

The tone of the Declaratory Act is resolute and authoritative, effectively dismissing colonial protests as unwarranted challenges to imperial sovereignty. It embodies the British view that the empire is a hierarchical structure where ultimate authority resides with Parliament and the crown, and that this authority must be exercised uniformly across all colonies. This perspective contrasts sharply with the colonial view, which emphasizes the importance of local governance and the rights of colonies as separate yet loyal parts of the empire. The colonists see taxing without direct representation as a violation of their rights, while Parliament sees it as within their sovereign rights to govern and tax colonies as they see fit.

Overall, these documents exemplify a fundamental ideological clash at the heart of colonial grievances. The colonists’ resolutions draw upon centuries of constitutional principles and local autonomy, asserting their rights and pushing back against unchecked Parliamentary authority. Parliament’s declaratory stance reinforces the imperial image of a unified, hierarchical governance structure, where the colonies are subordinate but loyal parts of the empire. These divergent perspectives set the stage for escalating conflicts, fueled by contrasting notions of sovereignty, rights, and governance, which would ultimately contribute to the revolutionary upheaval that followed.

References

• Bailyn, B. (1967). The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Harvard University Press.
• Cousins, M. (2010). The Declaration of Independence: An Interpretation. Parliament and Politics Series.
• Gordon, C. (2004). The American Revolution: A History. Oxford University Press.
• Henretta, J. A., Edwards, R., & Brody, C. (2018). America’s History. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
• Maier, P. (1972). From Resistance to Revolution: Colonial Radicals and the Development of American Opposition to Britain, 1765-1776. Alfred A. Knopf.
• Wood, G. S. (1992). The Radicalism of the American Revolution. Vintage Books.
• Wood, B. (1992). The Politics of Revolution: The Founding Fathers and the Debate over the Declaration of Independence. Cambridge University Press.
• Middlekauff, R. (2005). The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789. Oxford University Press.
• Lutts, R. (2001). The American Revolution and the British Empire. Praeger.
• Wright, R. (2011). The British Empire and the American Revolution. Routledge.