Written Exercise 2: Juvenile Court Vs. Adult Court

Written Exercise 2juvenile Court Vs Adult Courtjason Was Recently Arr

Written Exercise Questions: 1. What are the issues that need to be considered by a forensic psychologist in determining a transfer to adult court? 2. What methods would be used to make this decision? 3. What additional information would help in making this decision? 4. Identify why some juveniles are transferred to adult court. 5. Should Jason, in your expert opinion, be referred to adult court or should he remain in juvenile court? 6. Include in your response the goals of juvenile court in comparison to adult court; identify the differences between juvenile court and adult court. 7. Finally, explain why you do or do not agree with the trend of trying juveniles in adult courts.

Paper For Above instruction

The case of Jason, a seventeen-year-old male involved in a serious incident on school grounds, presents significant legal and psychological considerations regarding juvenile versus adult court proceedings. The decision to transfer a juvenile to adult court involves a comprehensive assessment, primarily through the lens of forensic psychology, which evaluates the offender’s mental state, prior behavior, potential for rehabilitation, and the severity of the offense.

Issues for Forensic Psychologists in Transfer Decisions

Forensic psychologists play a crucial role in evaluating whether a juvenile like Jason should be transferred to adult court. Key issues include assessing Jason’s mental competency, his criminal history, developmental maturity, and the threat he poses to society. Psychologists must evaluate his behavioral patterns, impulse control, understanding of the consequences, and attitudes towards violence and authority. Previous behavior, such as prior arrests for domestic violence-related obstruction and battery, indicates a potential pattern of aggression that warrants attention. The psychologist also considers whether Jason comprehends the legal process and his own culpability, which can influence the court’s decision.

Methods for Making the Transfer Decision

Decisions about transfer are typically made using a combination of psychological evaluations, risk assessments, and legal criteria. Standardized tools like the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), the Juvenile Assessment and Screening Tool (JAST), and other forensic assessments provide insights into Jason’s likelihood to reoffend and his capacity for rehabilitation. Moreover, interviews, behavioral observations, academic and social history, and collateral reports from parents and teachers help build a comprehensive profile. Courts also consider statutory factors such as the severity of the offense, prior juvenile record, and whether Jason’s actions indicate a level of maturity comparable to an adult.

Additional Information Needed

Further information that would aid in decision-making includes Jason’s psychological history, assessments of his cognitive and emotional development, and potential influences such as peer pressure or substance use. Data regarding his support network, motivation for rehabilitation, and attitudes toward his actions are also essential. Evaluations of mental health diagnoses, if any, and possible trauma history would provide a deeper understanding of underlying issues influencing his behavior.

Reasons for Transfer to Adult Court

Juveniles are transferred to adult court primarily for serious, violent, or repeat offenses, reflecting a belief that some offenders possess adult-level culpability or pose significant danger. Factors such as the gravity of the crime, prior juvenile offending history, and the offender’s maturity level influence transfer decisions. The goal is to hold offenders accountable and protect society, especially when rehabilitation in juvenile settings appears unlikely or when justice demands harsher penalties for heinous acts.

Expert Opinion on Jason’s Court Placement

Considering Jason’s age, prior records, and the severity of the current charges, a well-informed expert opinion might lean toward juvenile court, emphasizing rehabilitation and the developmental differences between juveniles and adults. Jason’s prior probation and the sealing of his juvenile record suggest he is still within a developmental window where intervention can be effective. However, the seriousness of his current actions, involving firearm discharge and assault, warrants careful risk assessment. If psychological evaluations show a high risk of reoffending or a lack of remorse, transfer to adult court could be considered, but the potential for rehabilitation in juvenile court should be thoroughly explored.

Goals and Differences of Juvenile versus Adult Courts

Juvenile courts focus on rehabilitation, education, and fostering responsible behavior, recognizing the ongoing development of minors. Their proceedings are typically less formal, confidentiality is prioritized, and records are often sealed to give juveniles a chance at a fresh start. In contrast, adult courts emphasize punishment, deterrence, and retribution, with open proceedings and permanent records. The juvenile justice system aims to guide minors back onto productive paths, whereas adult courts associate with sentencing that reflects culpability and societal punishment.

Opinions on Juveniles in Adult Courts

The trend of trying juveniles in adult courts remains controversial. Supporters argue that certain violent offenders, due to their maturity and severity of crimes, should face adult sentencing to ensure justice and public safety. Opponents contend that juveniles lack full cognitive maturity and are more amenable to rehabilitation within the juvenile system, making transfer counterproductive and potentially damaging. Based on developmental psychology research, many argue against automatic transfer, favoring nuanced evaluations prioritizing psychological maturity and individual circumstances over a punitive approach. I believe that transferring juveniles to adult courts should be reserved for the most extreme cases, with comprehensive assessments guiding decisions, to balance justice, rehabilitation potential, and community safety.

References

  • Farrington, D. P. (2005). Youth Crime and Juvenile Justice. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602(1), 15-30.
  • Grisso, T. (2008). Double jeopardy: Adolescent offenders with mental disorders in the criminal justice system. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 36(4), 468–477.
  • Hockenberry, S., & Puzzanchera, C. (2017). Juvenile Court Statistics 2014. OJJDP Juvenile Court Statistcs.
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2005). Practical meta-analysis. Sage Publications.
  • Mears, D. P., & Cochran, J. C. (2005). Police crackdowns and youth violence: Implications for policy and practice. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 3(3), 218–234.
  • Pardini, D. (2011). Understanding Desistance from Youth Violence: Implications for Prevention and Policy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(2), 138–153.
  • Schubert, C. A., Mulvey, E. P., & Hegberg, L. (2014). The importance of developmental maturity in juvenile justice. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 12(4), 347–367.
  • Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 69-74.
  • Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20(3), 249–262.
  • Wilson, D. B., & Lipsey, M. W. (2007). School-based interventions for delinquent behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 329–357.

Related Assignments