You Are An Economist For The Vanda Laye Corporation
You Are An Economist For The Vanda Laye Corporation Which Produces An
You are an economist for the Vanda Laye Corporation, which produces and distributes outdoor cooking supplies. The company has come under new ownership and management and will be undergoing changes in its product lines and operating structure. As an economist, your responsibilities include examining the market factors that affect success or failure of a product, including the supply and demand for the product, market conditions, and the behavior of competitors with similar products. The new owners are evaluating the operating structure, and you have two possible alternatives. One alternative requires a high level of investment in fixed costs compared to the other alternative.
Jorge, your supervisor, has assigned you the task of evaluating the two alternatives. Assume that the company has no debt. Regardless of the alternative selected, market conditions will require the selling price of the product to be $3.45 per unit. The details for each alternative are given in the table. Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Variable costs $2.20 $2.70 Fixed costs $80,000 $30,000 Total assets $350,000 $350,000 Jorge has asked you to provide detailed responses to the following questions: How does CVP analysis help management in the planning stage of a new business? How does CVP analysis assist the decision makers of an existing business? What is the break-even quantity for each of the investment alternatives, calculated using an algebraic approach? Complete the tables for each alternative using the Microsoft Excel Template given below and indicate the break-even points. Using Microsoft Excel, graph the relevant data, showing the break-even points and the profit levels for each alternative. Explain the differences between the two alternatives.
What is the degree of operating leverage (DOL) for each alternative at 90,000 units? What is the significance of different DOLs using this example? What does the return on equity (ROE) ratio tell management? How is it used in the decision-making process? What is the ROE under each alternative at an output level of 124,000 for Alternative 1 and 60,000 for Alternative 2? (As the company has no debt, the formula for ROE becomes profit/assets. Use this formula.) Explain the reason for and significance of your answers. Which alternative would you recommend to the company? Explain the pros and cons of each alternative and the reasons for your selection. Compile your calculations and graph in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet named and your analysis in a Microsoft Word document.
Paper For Above instruction
Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) analysis is an essential managerial accounting tool that assists management in planning, decision-making, and controlling operations within a business. By analyzing the relationships between costs, volume, and profit at different levels of activity, CVP provides crucial insights into how various factors influence financial outcomes. This paper explores how CVP analysis supports both the planning of new businesses and decision-making in existing companies, with a focus on the specific context of evaluating two operational alternatives for the Vanda Laye Corporation, a producer and distributor of outdoor cooking supplies.
CVP Analysis in Business Planning
In the initial stages of establishing a new business, CVP analysis enables entrepreneurs and managers to estimate the sales volume required to cover all fixed and variable costs, known as the break-even point (Garrison, Noreen, & Brewer, 2018). This helps in setting realistic sales targets and pricing strategies. By understanding how changes in sales volume impact profitability, management can assess whether the proposed business model is financially viable before committing significant resources. For instance, in the context of Vanda Laye, CVP analysis aids in evaluating whether the projected sales levels across different product lines are sufficient to generate expected profits under various assumptions (Hansen & Mowen, 2020).
Furthermore, CVP analysis helps managers to perform sensitivity analyses, measuring how variations in sales prices, costs, or volumes influence the overall profitability. This supports strategic planning, including budgeting and resource allocation. For new ventures, it assists in risk assessment by identifying sales levels necessary for sustainability and growth, providing a quantitative foundation for decision making (Block, Hirt, & Danielsen, 2018).
CVP Analysis for Existing Businesses
For established companies like Vanda Laye, CVP analysis continues to be a vital tool for optimizing operations and making informed decisions. It helps managers evaluate the profitability of different product lines, pricing adjustments, or marketing strategies. For example, by calculating the break-even point for each alternative, management can assess the level of sales needed to avoid losses under different operating structures. This becomes particularly relevant when considering significant changes such as varying investment levels or shifts in fixed costs, as seen in the two alternatives proposed by Vanda Laye's management (Garrison et al., 2018).
Moreover, CVP analysis enables managers to understand the impact of leveraging fixed costs on profitability through the degree of operating leverage (DOL). A higher DOL indicates greater sensitivity of operating profit to sales fluctuations, which informs risk management strategies (Hansen & Mowen, 2020). By analyzing the contribution margin ratio and fixed costs, managers can decide the optimal operating point and develop contingency plans.
The analysis of the contribution margin per unit and the break-even point provides fundamental insights into product profitability and operational efficiency. Additionally, it supports decision-making regarding product focus, cost management, and resource investment. For instance, understanding at which output levels each alternative becomes profitable and how sensitive profits are to changes in sales volume assists management in making data-driven decisions (Garrison et al., 2018).
Calculation of Break-even Points
The break-even point (BEP) in units is calculated using the formula:
\[
\text{BEP (units)} = \frac{\text{Fixed Costs}}{\text{Selling Price per Unit} - \text{Variable Cost per Unit}}
\]
Applying this to each alternative:
- Alternative 1:
\[
\text{BEP} = \frac{80,000}{3.45 - 2.20} = \frac{80,000}{1.25} = 64,000 \text{ units}
\]
- Alternative 2:
\[
\text{BEP} = \frac{30,000}{3.45 - 2.70} = \frac{30,000}{0.75} = 40,000 \text{ units}
\]
Graphical representation of these points illustrates the relationship between sales volume and profit, with both the break-even points and profitability at different sales levels clearly depicted. The higher fixed costs in Alternative 1 result in a higher break-even volume, emphasizing greater risk but potential for higher profits with increased sales.
Analysis of Operating Leverage and Return on Equity
The Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL) measures how a percentage change in sales volume affects operating income, providing insights into risk and profitability sensitivity. At a specific sales volume, DOL is calculated as:
\[
\text{DOL} = \frac{\text{Contribution Margin}}{\text{Operating Income}}
\]
At 90,000 units:
- Alternative 1:
\[
\text{Contribution Margin} = 90,000 \times (3.45 - 2.20) = 90,000 \times 1.25 = 112,500
\]
\[
\text{Operating Income} = \text{Contribution Margin} - Fixed Costs= 112,500 - 80,000 = 32,500
\]
\[
\text{DOL} = \frac{112,500}{32,500} \approx 3.46
\]
- Alternative 2:
\[
\text{Contribution Margin} = 90,000 \times (3.45 - 2.70) = 90,000 \times 0.75 = 67,500
\]
\[
\text{Operating Income} = 67,500 - 30,000 = 37,500
\]
\[
\text{DOL} = \frac{67,500}{37,500} \approx 1.80
\]
Higher DOL in Alternative 1 signifies greater sensitivity to sales fluctuations, implying higher risk but also higher potential profit margins when sales exceed the break-even point.
Return on Equity (ROE) measures profitability relative to assets, calculated as:
\[
\text{ROE} = \frac{\text{Profit}}{\text{Assets}}
\]
At specified output levels:
- Alternative 1 at 124,000 units:
\[
\text{Profit} = (\text{Contribution Margin} \times 124,000) - \text{Fixed Costs}
\]
Contribution Margin per unit = $1.25:
\[
\Rightarrow \text{Total Contribution} = 124,000 \times 1.25 = 155,000
\]
\[
\text{Profit} = 155,000 - 80,000 = 75,000
\]
\[
\text{ROE} = \frac{75,000}{350,000} \approx 0.2143 \text{ or } 21.43\%
\]
- Alternative 2 at 60,000 units:
Contribution margin per unit = $0.75:
\[
\text{Total Contribution} = 60,000 \times 0.75 = 45,000
\]
\[
\text{Profit} = 45,000 - 30,000 = 15,000
\]
\[
\text{ROE} = \frac{15,000}{350,000} \approx 0.0429 \text{ or } 4.29\%
\]
These calculations demonstrate that Alternative 1 offers a higher ROE at higher sales volumes, reflecting greater efficiency and profitability potential, albeit with higher risk. The lower ROE in Alternative 2 indicates greater stability but limited profitability.
Recommendation and Conclusion
Choosing between the two alternatives requires weighing the higher fixed costs and risk of Alternative 1 against its potential for superior profitability but greater sensitivity to sales fluctuations. Alternative 1's higher break-even volume and DOL suggest it is more suitable for a company confident in achieving higher sales levels but pose a risk if sales decline. Conversely, Alternative 2's lower fixed costs and break-even point offer stability with lower profitability margins.
Based on the analyses, if Vanda Laye anticipates strong growth and can confidently project sales beyond 64,000 units, Alternative 1 is advantageous due to higher ROE and profit potential. However, if conservative risk management is prioritized, Alternative 2 provides a safer operational structure with lower volatility.
Ultimately, I recommend selecting Alternative 1 if the company’s sales forecasts are optimistic and the market conditions favor growth. The higher returns justify the increased risk, and the company can leverage the higher operating leverage to maximize profits in favorable scenarios. Should the market outlook be uncertain, the safer alternative—Alternative 2—would mitigate risks but at the expense of lower returns.
The comprehensive analysis, including algebraic calculations, graphical data representation, and strategic considerations, demonstrates how CVP analysis guides effective decision-making and risk assessment, enabling management to align operational strategies with financial goals for sustainable growth.
References
- Block, M. K., Hirt, G. A., & Danielsen, B. R. (2018). Foundations of Financial Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2018). Managerial Accounting (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
- Hansen, D. R., & Mowen, M. M. (2020). Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis. Cengage Learning.
- Hilton, R. W., & Platt, D. (2018). Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting. Cengage Learning.
- Horngren, C. T., et al. (2019). Introduction to Management Accounting. Pearson.
- Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2020). Managerial Accounting. Wiley.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (2019). Advanced Management Accounting. Pearson.
- Anthony, R., & Govindarajan, V. (2019). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.
- McKeown, J. C. (2018). Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis in Decision Making. Journal of Business Strategy, 39(3), 45-55.