You Are Considering Starting A Walk-In Clinic For Your Finan
1 You Are Considering Starting A Walk In Clinic Your Financial Proje
You are considering starting a walk-in clinic and need to develop comprehensive financial projections for its first year of operation. Your projection includes several key financial elements: patient visits, various operational costs, and overall financial performance metrics. Specifically, you should analyze the cost structure, anticipated total costs at different patient visit levels, and the per-visit costs. Additionally, you will examine the hospital’s overhead cost allocation methods and their implications for departmental cost distribution. Furthermore, evaluating service pricing strategies in the audiology department and assessing hospital profitability and discounting policies are essential to understanding the financial viability of healthcare services. The primary goal is to synthesize these financial insights to support operational decision-making and strategic planning for the proposed clinic and associated hospital services.
Paper For Above instruction
Starting a walk-in clinic requires a detailed understanding of its cost structure, operational costs, and pricing strategy to ensure financial sustainability. This paper systematically explores these elements, beginning with the analysis of the fixed and variable costs that comprise the clinic's fundamental cost structure. It then moves into calculating expected total costs at various patient visit levels, including 7,500 and 12,500 visits, and deriving the average costs per visit. These insights are crucial for assessing pricing strategies and operational efficiency.
Cost Structure Analysis
The clinic's cost structure comprises both fixed and variable components. Fixed costs include utilities ($2,500), wages and benefits ($220,000), rent ($5,000), administrative supplies ($10,000), and depreciation ($30,000). These costs remain constant regardless of patient visit volume. In contrast, supplies costs are variable, totaling $50,000 for 10,000 visits, implying a variable cost per visit of $5 ($50,000 / 10,000). Thus, the clinic’s cost structure predominantly consists of fixed costs, with supplies and associated costs varying directly with patient volume.
This fixed-cost-heavy structure suggests that the clinic’s breakeven point is determined primarily by covering fixed costs with contribution margins generated through patient visits. The high fixed costs necessitate efficient utilization and patient volume to achieve profitability.
Projected Total Costs and Cost per Visit
Calculating total costs at different visit volumes involves adding fixed costs to variable costs. For the base case of 10,000 visits, total costs can be computed as:
\[
\text{Total Costs} = \text{Fixed Costs} + (\text{Variable Cost per Visit} \times \text{Number of Visits})
= (2,500 + 220,000 + 5,000 + 10,000 + 30,000) + (5 \times 10,000)
= 267,500 + 50,000
= \$317,500
\]
At 7,500 visits:
\[
\text{Total Costs} = 267,500 + (5 \times 7,500) = 267,500 + 37,500 = \$305,000
\]
At 12,500 visits:
\[
\text{Total Costs} = 267,500 + (5 \times 12,500) = 267,500 + 62,500 = \$330,000
\]
The corresponding average costs per visit are:
- At 7,500 visits: \$305,000 / 7,500 ≈ \$40.67
- At 10,000 visits: \$317,500 / 10,000 = \$31.75
- At 12,500 visits: \$330,000 / 12,500 = \$26.40
This analysis demonstrates the economies of scale; as visit volume increases, the average cost per visit decreases, highlighting the importance of high utilization for cost efficiency.
Hospital Overhead Cost Allocation
The hospital employs the direct method for overhead allocation, with different cost drivers. For General Administration and Financial Services, patient services revenue is used as the driver, while space utilization serves as the driver for facilities costs. The appropriate allocation rates entail dividing the total departmental overheads by their respective drivers:
- For General Administration and Financial Services:
\[
\text{Rate} = \frac{\text{Total Overhead}}{\text{Patient Services Revenue}}
\]
- For Facilities:
\[
\text{Rate} = \frac{\text{Total Facilities Cost}}{\text{Space Utilization}}
\]
Allocating costs based on these drivers assigns overheads directly to departments proportional to their utilization of revenue or physical space, respectively. This approach ensures that departments consuming more resources bear a larger share of overheads.
Alternative Cost Allocation Methods
Implementing salary dollars as the driver for General Administration and housekeeping labor hours for Facilities presents a different perspective. The rates are computed as:
- For General Administration:
\[
\text{Rate} = \frac{\text{Total G&A Salary Dollars}}{\text{Total Salary Dollars}}
\]
- For Facilities (housekeeping):
\[
\text{Rate} = \frac{\text{Total Facilities Labor Hours}}{\text{Total Housekeeping Labor Hours}}
\]
Allocating overheads using these drivers may result in more precise distribution, especially when departmental activities are closely linked to these specific resource usages. This approach often reflects operational realities better, providing more accurate cost insights compared to revenue-based or space-based drivers.
Comparing the two schemes reveals that different methods can significantly alter departmental costs, influencing managerial decisions on resource allocation and cost control.
Costing in the Audiology Department
The audiology department serves patients through various services, each with specific variable and fixed costs and utilization rates. The basic examination radiates a variable cost of \$5 per session and fixed costs totaling \$50,000 annually, with 3,000 visits. The advanced examination has a variable cost of \$30 per session, with 1,500 visits, while therapy sessions have a variable cost of \$10 and 500 visits per year.
The fee schedule must cover variable costs, direct fixed costs, and overhead allocation. For each service, the minimum fee is:
\[
\text{Fee} = \text{Variable Cost} + \frac{\text{Fixed Costs}}{\text{Number of Visits}}
\]
- Basic Examination:
\[
\$5 + \frac{\$50,000}{3,000} = \$5 + \$16.67 \approx \$21.67
\]
- Advanced Examination:
\[
\$30 + \frac{\$50,000}{1,500} = \$30 + \$33.33 \approx \$63.33
\]
- Therapy Session:
\[
\$10 + \frac{\$50,000}{500} = \$10 + \$100 = \$110
\]
Adding overhead costs of \$50,000 allocated equally on a per-visit basis, each service's fee must be adjusted. For example, if overhead is allocated equally based on number of visits:
\[
\text{Overhead per service} = \frac{\$50,000}{(3,000 + 1,500 + 500)} = \$50,000 / 5,000 = \$10 per visit
\]
The revised fees will reflect the need to cover variable costs, fixed costs per service, and share of overheads, leading to higher fees—specifically, for the basic examination:
\[
\$5 + \$16.67 + \$10 = \$31.67
\]
Similarly, the advanced examination would cost:
\[
\$30 + \$33.33 + \$10 = \$73.33
\]
And therapy sessions:
\[
\$10 + \$100 + \$10 = \$120
\]
To ensure profitability, the department must also consider profit margins. For a desired combined profit of \$25,000, fees must be increased proportionally across services based on their proportionate costs and revenues, ensuring their contribution covers both costs and profit targets.
Financial Performance of a Non-Profit Hospital
The hospital’s financial outlook can be evaluated by constructing a projected profit and loss statement based on provided data: fixed costs of \$10 million, variable costs of \$200 per inpatient day, and revenue of \$1,000 per inpatient day, with an expected inpatient volume of 15,000 days.
The projected revenue is:
\[
\$1,000 \times 15,000 = \$15,000,000
\]
The variable costs are:
\[
\$200 \times 15,000 = \$3,000,000
\]
Total costs:
\[
\$10,000,000 + \$3,000,000 = \$13,000,000
\]
Resulting in a projected profit:
\[
\$15,000,000 - \$13,000,000 = \$2,000,000
\]
To determine breakeven volume, set total costs equal to revenue:
\[
\$10,000,000 + \$200 \times \text{break-even days} = \$1,000 \times \text{break-even days}
\]
Solve for break-even days:
\[
\$10,000,000 = (\$1,000 - \$200) \times \text{break-even days}
\]
\[
\$10,000,000 = \$800 \times \text{break-even days}
\]
\[
\text{break-even days} = \frac{\$10,000,000}{\$800} = 12,500 \text{ days}
\]
This indicates that the hospital needs approximately 12,500 inpatient days to break even.
For achieving profits of \$1,000,000 or \$500,000, the required inpatient days are:
- For \$1,000,000 profit:
\[
\$10,000,000 + \$200 \times x = \$1,000 \times x + \$1,000,000
\]
\[
\$10,000,000 + \$200 x = \$1,000 x + \$1,000,000
\]
\[
\$10,000,000 - \$1,000,000 = (\$1,000 - \$200) x
\]
\[
\$9,000,000 = \$800 x
\]
\[
x = \frac{\$9,000,000}{\$800} = 11,250 \text{ inpatient days}
\]
- For \$500,000 profit:
\[
\$10,000,000 + \$200 x = \$1,000 x + \$500,000
\]
\[
\$10,000,000 - \$500,000 = \$800 x
\]
\[
\$9,500,000 = \$800 x
\]
\[
x = \frac{\$9,500,000}{\$800} \approx 11,875 \text{ inpatient days}
\]
Finally, the hospital should consider discounting 25 percent for managed care plans, which offer a 20 percent share of inpatient days at a 25 percent discount from standard charges. In this case, the hospital must evaluate whether the discounted revenue still covers variable and allocated fixed costs. The reduced revenue per inpatient day from managed care:
\[
\$1,000 \times (1 - 0.25) = \$750
\]
The hospital must analyze whether serving these managed care days at \$750 per day, with the corresponding variable costs, still contributes adequately to overall fixed costs and profitability goals.
Conclusion
This comprehensive analysis underscores the critical importance of understanding cost structures, appropriate cost allocation methods, service pricing strategies, and the financial implications of patient volume and payer mix in healthcare operations. Effective management of fixed versus variable costs and strategic pricing can significantly influence the hospital’s ability to attain financial sustainability and achieve its mission as a non-profit entity. Moreover, adopting suitable cost drivers for overhead allocation enhances accuracy and managerial decision-making, ultimately improving resource utilization. As healthcare providers navigate fluctuating volumes and reimbursement policies, rigorous financial planning remains essential for maintaining quality and financial health.
References
- Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting. Cengage Learning.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Anderson, S. R. (2004). Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 131-138.
- Kelly, J. (2020). Healthcare Finance: An Introduction to Accounting and Financial Management. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
- Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. (2015). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Pearson.
- Zhang, Y., et al. (2017). Cost Allocation and Budgeting in Healthcare Organizations. Journal of Healthcare Management, 62(3), 191-204.
- Carroll, M. (2019). Financial Management in Healthcare Organizations. Routledge.
- Daemmrich, A. A. (2019). The Political Economy of Healthcare in the United States. Routledge.
- Finkler, S. A., & Ward, D. M. (2018). Financial Management for Nurse Managers. Elsevier Health Sciences.
- Robinson, J. C. (2015). The Economics of Health Care Quality and Cost Control. Harvard University Press.
- Norrell, B. (2016). Nursing and Healthcare Finance: Financial Management for Nurse Managers and Executives. Jones & Bartlett Learning.