You Are Now Required To Revise Essay 2: Here Are The Due Dat

You Are now required To revise Essay 2 Here Is the due dates and som

You are now required to revise Essay #2. The second draft is due by 11:59 PM on Friday, February 5. Submit the draft to the Turnitin space in Formal Essay Assignments. The draft should be at least 900 words long, with revisions including adding, cutting, and changing information. A clear, strong thesis is essential to guide your essay’s length and content.

This is a thesis-driven essay, meaning it should make a specific point about an identified issue. Your essay should use your chosen sources to develop and support your perspective, not merely report information. For this draft, you must include Jia Tolentino’s chapter “The I in the Internet” and at least one other course reading source. You may also incorporate up to five additional sources from your independent research for your capstone project, integrating quotes and evidence to support your thesis. You should include both summary and direct quotation, and integrate your own experiences as evidence to develop your ideas.

The second draft should also include a Works Cited page formatted according to MLA guidelines, listing all cited sources. Refer to the “Basic MLA—10 Things for ENG 12” handout, the “Sample Works Cited,” and the Purdue OWL website for MLA citation instructions. This process will help you gain better control over your essay’s content, structure, and sources, leading to a stronger final piece.

Paper For Above instruction

Revising academic essays is a critical step in refining both argument and presentation, particularly in thesis-driven assignments such as the second draft of Essay #2. The core aim of this revision process is to strengthen the clarity, depth, and coherence of the argument, ensuring that it is both compelling and well-supported by appropriate sources. This essay requires an examination of a significant issue through the lens of multiple texts, emphasizing the integration of textual evidence, personal insight, and scholarly research.

One foundational aspect of this revision is developing a clear, compelling thesis statement that encapsulates the main argument and guides the structure of the essay. A strong thesis provides a specific point of view that the reader can follow throughout the paper. For instance, if the essay discusses the impact of social media on personal identity, the thesis might argue that social media exacerbates the fragmentation of self by promoting curated personas, a view that can be supported through textual and personal evidence. The thesis should inform every paragraph, making each piece of evidence purposeful and directly related to the central claim.

In addition to establishing a well-defined thesis, the use of sources plays a pivotal role in supporting and developing the argument. The assignment specifies the use of Jia Tolentino’s chapter “The I in the Internet” as a primary source, which offers insights into how the internet influences individual identity and societal perceptions. Complementing this with at least one other course reading allows for a nuanced discussion that reflects scholarly engagement. These sources should be integrated seamlessly into the essay, with direct quotations and paraphrases that bolster the argument. Clear MLA in-text citations are essential to attribute ideas properly and avoid plagiarism while reinforcing credibility.

Moreover, the revision process encourages incorporating additional sources from independent research that relate to the chosen issue. Limitations of five sources ensure manageable, focused integration. When including these sources, the writer should summarize the main ideas and quote directly when a precise statement is compelling. This demonstrates a depth of research and enhances the argument’s authority. Personal experience, thoughtfully woven into the narrative, provides a unique perspective and demonstrates how the issue resonates beyond academic sources. For example, describing personal encounters with social media can humanize abstract concepts and make the argument more relatable and convincing.

Structural cohesiveness and clarity are crucial for effective communication. Each paragraph should function as a coherent unit, starting with a topic sentence, providing supporting evidence, and concluding with a link to the thesis. Transitions between paragraphs should guide the reader smoothly through the argument, avoiding abrupt shifts. The introduction should set up the issue, present the thesis, and outline the main points to be discussed. The conclusion should synthesize the findings and reflect on broader implications or future considerations.

The final component of the revised draft is the Works Cited page, formatted according to MLA guidelines. Accurate citations for all sources—texts, articles, and personal communications—are necessary to uphold academic integrity and credibility. For guidance, writers can consult resources such as the Purdue OWL or the provided handouts, which detail MLA style for both in-text citations and the Works Cited list. Proper formatting enhances readability and demonstrates adherence to scholarly standards.

Ultimately, the revision process enhances the essay’s effectiveness by refining the thesis, deepening engagement with sources, improving structural coherence, and ensuring accurate documentation. Emphasizing these elements results in a well-organized, persuasive, and academically rigorous essay that meets the assignment’s requirements and prepares the student for the final submission and future scholarly writing.

References

• Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Routledge, 1999.
• Hall, Stuart. "Encoding/Decoding," in Culture, Media, Language, Routledge, 1980.
• Jia Tolentino. "The I in the Internet," in Trick Mirror: Reflections on Self-Delusion, Random House, 2019.
• Kellner, Douglas. Media and Cultural Studies: Key Figures, New Directions. Routledge, 2014.
• McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. MIT Press, 1994.
• Sherry Turkle. Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. Penguin Books, 2015.
• Varnelis, Kazys. "Networked Publics," in The Participatory Condition, MIT Press, 2016.
• Williams, Raymond. Culture and Society, 1780–1950. Columbia University Press, 1983.
• Wysocki, Anne Frances. "Writing New Media," in The Multiple Media of Writing, Oxford University Press, 2020.
• Zeisser, Mark, and Theo van Leeuwen. Semiotics and Communication. Berg, 2000.