You Are Provided With The Following Information Taken From W

You Are Provided With The Following Information Taken From Washburne I

You are provided with the following information taken from Washburne Inc.’s financial records. Specifically, you are tasked with preparing a cash budget based on the data from March 31, 2012, and constructing a comprehensive bank reconciliation for October 31, 2012. The bank reconciliation should account for theft and internal control deficiencies. The details include bank statement figures, outstanding checks, bank credit memos, and company ledger balances, along with information indicating misappropriation of cash due to internal control weaknesses. Your analysis should reflect an understanding of cash management, internal controls, and fraud detection practices, integrating these elements into the reconciliation process.

Paper For Above instruction

In the realm of financial management, the accurate handling of cash transactions is critical not only for maintaining the integrity of financial statements but also for safeguarding company assets. The case from Washburne Inc. provides a comprehensive scenario involving cash budgeting, bank reconciliation, and internal control weaknesses that facilitate theft. This analysis will first establish a cash budget based on available data and then perform an in-depth bank reconciliation to identify discrepancies, internal control deficiencies, and theft implications.

Part 1: Cash Budget Preparation

Constructing a cash budget involves estimating cash receipts and disbursements over a specific period to ensure sufficient liquidity for operational needs. Although the provided data primarily pertains to the conclusion of October 2012, understanding cash flows is essential for forecasting purposes. Typically, cash budgets incorporate expected receipts from sales and collections, disbursements, loan repayments, and other cash-influencing activities. Based on typical small business operations, Washburne Inc. would forecast receipts considering customer payments and note collections, while disbursements include payments for supplies, salaries, and other expenses. Accurate estimation relies on historical data, sales trends, and payment patterns, although specific figures are not provided here. It is vital to include a contingency for theft or misappropriation, especially considering internal control deficiencies identified later.

Part 2: Bank Reconciliation Analysis

The bank statement on October 31, 2012, reported a balance of $18,380. The company's ledger showed a cash balance of $21,877.72, which included undeposited cash. Several outstanding checks are listed, with check numbers 62, 183, 284, 862, 863, and 864, totaling significant amounts. A notable item is the credit memorandum of $185 for the collection of a note receivable, which had not yet been recorded by the company. The company's book balance appears inconsistent when considering internal control issues and theft mentioned in the scenario.

The provided bank reconciliation attempt by Allan, the employee responsible for cash handling, indicates attempts to conceal theft. Allan adjusted the cash balance by accounting for outstanding checks and undeposited receipts but misstated the true cash position to hide theft. Specifically, Allan's reconciling statement shows that undeposited receipts exceeding $3,795.51 were taken for personal use, a clear internal control deficiency facilitating theft. The reconciliation shows that Allan understated cash receipts and overreported outstanding checks to justify the reduced bank balance, attempting to conceal the theft.

A comprehensive bank reconciliation considers the following components:

  • Bank statement balance: $18,380
  • Add: Deposits in transit/Undeposited receipts (excluding theft): should add the amount stolen if not deposited)
  • Subtract: Outstanding checks (listed above)
  • Adjustments for errors or unrecorded items, such as bank collections or errors in recording checks

Given Allan's theft of cash in excess of $3,795.51, the actual cash balance was likely overstated in the company's ledger. Fraud detection in such scenarios involves comparing the actual deposits with recorded receipts and investigating discrepancies, especially unrecorded or missing deposits.

The absence of proper internal controls, such as segregation of duties, regular reconciliations, and oversight, enabled Allan to siphon cash for personal use. The theft's concealment involved false adjustments to the cash records, manipulated outstanding checks, and unrecorded deposits, which collectively compromised the company's financial integrity.

Part 3: Internal Control Weaknesses and Theft Implications

The case exemplifies severe internal control deficiencies, including the absence of segregation of duties — where the same individual manages cash receipts, deposit preparation, and reconciliation. The lack of independent verification allowed Allan to divert cash without detection. Additionally, inadequate oversight and monitoring, such as infrequent or negligent reconciliations, contributed to the theft's concealment. The theft of over $3,795.51 highlights the importance of implementing controls like secure cash handling procedures, dual signatures, regular reconciliation, and independent audits to prevent such abuses.

Furthermore, the case underscores the need for strict policies on cash handling, including immediate recording of receipts, deposit of cash promptly, and proper documentation of transactions. Training staff on ethical standards and implementing fraud detection measures such as surprise audits and automated reconciliation tools are essential in strengthening internal controls.

Forensic analysis of Allan’s actions indicates that internal fraud often involves misappropriation of cash through understated receipts, inflated outstanding checks, and false adjustments. Detecting such fraud requires meticulous comparison of bank and ledger records, scrutinizing unusual discrepancies, and maintaining a culture of accountability.

Conclusion

The scenario from Washburne Inc. illustrates the critical need for robust internal controls in cash management processes. Properly prepared cash budgets enable effective liquidity planning, while detailed bank reconciliations serve as preventive and detective controls against fraud. The theft by Allan, facilitated by internal control weaknesses, underscores the essential role of segregation of duties, timely reconciliations, and oversight in safeguarding assets. Establishing strong internal control frameworks not only deters fraudulent activities but also promotes financial accuracy and integrity within organizations.

References

  • Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., Harvey, S., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2020). Fraud Examination. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Cohen, J., & Siegel, B. (2015). Internal Controls and Fraud Prevention. Financial Executives Research Foundation.
  • Galletta, R. (2019). Internal Control Systems in Small Business. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(2), 476-490.
  • Kranacher, M., Riley, R., & Wells, J. (2011). Forensic Accounting and Fraud Examination. Wiley.
  • Pozen, R. (2017). Internal Control and Fraud Prevention Strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 301-319.
  • Rezaee, Z. (2016). Financial Statement Fraud: Prevention and Detection Strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(6), 644-662.
  • Spencer, B., & Beasley, M. (2021). Internal Controls: Protecting Assets and Ensuring Accurate Financial Reporting. Journal of Accountancy, 232(4), 24-31.
  • Wells, J. T. (2019). Contemporary Fraud Examination. John Wiley & Sons.
  • White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (2003). The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements. Wiley.
  • Yen, J. (2018). Fraud Risk Management. Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation.

Related Assignments