You Are To Recommend A Realistic And Effective Course Of Act

You Are To Recommend A Realistic And Effective Course Of Action The D

You are to recommend a realistic and effective course of action. The deliverable is a 2-page user-friendly report summarizing the issues, analyzing each alternative, and making a recommendation. Reflect on the situation and prepare an annotated plan of how you would approach advising members of e*Bancorp’s C-suite. Outline and explain the rationale behind the steps you will take in preparing the advice, the platform you will be choosing to deliver, and briefly summarize the key points you have decided to make in the 2-page report.

Paper For Above instruction

In the rapidly evolving digital banking landscape, ethical practices are fundamental to sustaining trust, ensuring compliance, and maintaining a competitive edge. For eBancorp, a prominent online financial institution operating across multiple continents, addressing unethical internal and industry practices, especially in e-marketing and e-banking products, is paramount. This paper aims to recommend a realistic and effective course of action for eBancorp’s executive leadership, providing an analytical overview of the issues, potential alternatives, and a decisive recommendation.

Identification of Issues

First, ethical concerns in internal and industry practices such as money laundering, investment fraud, and toxic loans undermine the integrity of the banking sector, including e*Bancorp. These unethical behaviors often stem from poor management, insider abuses, and lax regulatory adherence (ThisDayLive, 2019). Such practices not only threaten regulatory penalties but also erode public trust, which is vital for customer retention and brand reputation. The bank’s internal issues need urgent addressing to align its operations with ethical standards.

Second, unethical e-marketing practices emerge from the digital nature of online advertising, which invites deceptive tactics like false claims, fake reviews, and misleading solicitation methods. For example, deceptive invoices disguised as donation requests exploit consumers’ trust (LoFrisco, 2020). Such dishonesty can damage the company’s brand integrity and invite regulatory scrutiny. Ensuring honesty and transparency in marketing is essential to maintain customer confidence.

Third, unethical practices related to e-banking products, such as employees opening unauthorized accounts or issuing debit and credit cards without customer approval, jeopardize customer security and violate legal standards (Taiyan, 2019). The ease of manipulating digital platforms without adequate oversight raises concerns about security lapses and the misappropriation of customer funds. Addressing these vulnerabilities is critical for safeguarding client assets and complying with banking regulations.

Analysis of Alternatives

Three primary strategies emerge to combat these issues. The first involves delaying the launch of the mDeposit service until ethical practices are reinforced. While this may temporarily hinder market expansion, it prevents reputational damage from launching a product plagued by ethical lapses. The second option advocates for organization-wide ethical training programs. Such training would educate employees on compliance, ethical behavior, and company values, reducing the likelihood of misconduct (Kaptein, 2011). This proactive approach fosters a culture of integrity and accountability.

The third alternative emphasizes enforcing consistency through regular audits, transparency, and ongoing monitoring. Instituting robust ethical risk management practices, including periodic reviews and compliance checks, ensures that ethical standards are maintained over time. This approach complements preventive measures and sustains long-term trustworthiness. However, these strategies require resource allocation—both financial and managerial—and organizational buy-in.

Recommended Course of Action

Based on the analysis, the most effective course of action is a combination of delaying the mDeposit launch and implementing comprehensive ethical training coupled with ongoing oversight. Prioritizing the delay provides an opportunity to embed ethical considerations into the platform’s development, ensuring that security features prevent unauthorized account access and that marketing practices uphold honesty. The $5 million allocated for mDeposit should instead be directed toward establishing a company-wide ethical culture, including training programs and monitoring systems.

Specifically, the steps should include conducting an ethical risk assessment, designing targeted training modules for different organizational levels, and instituting a continuous monitoring framework. These actions will prepare e*Bancorp to launch the platform with confidence, minimizing legal and reputational risks. Moreover, cultivating a strong ethical culture will enhance employee engagement and customer satisfaction, ultimately leading to sustained profitability.

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing ethical deficiencies at eBancorp requires a strategic, multi-faceted approach. Delaying the mDeposit launch allows the company to rectify internal practices and build ethical safeguards before market entry. Coupling this with organizational-wide ethical training and continuous oversight cultivates a culture of integrity, essential for long-term success. By enforcing these measures, eBancorp can protect its reputation, comply with relevant laws, and foster consumer trust in the increasingly digital banking environment.

References

• Barclay-Platenburg, L. A. (2014). Ethical risks, fines, or profits? The Case of e*Bancorp.
• ThisDayLive. (2019). Unethical practices in the banks. https://www.thisdaylive.com
• LoFrisco, A. (2020). Avoiding the unethical digital marketing minefield. AdEdgeMarketing.
• Taiyan, B. (2019). The Wells Fargo Cross-Selling Scandal. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.
• Kaptein, M. (2011). Understanding unethical behavior in organizations: A social cognitive perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 59-73.
• Ferrell, O. C., & Fraedrich, J. (2015). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases. Cengage Learning.
• Schwepker, C. H. (2001). Ethical climate’s association with ethical conflict handling. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(3), 143-156.
• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Thompson, A. A., Peteraf, M. A., Gamble, J. E., & Strickland III, A. J. (2015). Crafting and Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008). Ethics training and business ethic conduct: Taking stock and looking ahead. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(4), 403-418.