You Have Kicked Off The District 4 Warehouse Move

You Have Kicked Off The District 4 Production Warehouse Move Project

You have kicked off the District 4 Production Warehouse Move project, your contractors are in place and working on receiving the proper building permits. You originally were told the permits would only take 2 weeks to obtain but the contractors are telling you it will now take 3 weeks. You need to build the additional week into your schedule for each permit that will be obtained. In addition, your framing and drywall contractors have just told you they are running late on their other jobs and can only release half their crew for your project. This will double their schedule. Build the extra time into your schedule by doubling the installation work timelines for both the framing and drywall. Your project plan should also be updated with the new 3-week timeline for obtaining permits. Use the project plan you created for this task. You are now looking at an extended project delivery date. Your project sponsor was very clear that you must be done in a 4 month timeframe so you will need to look at options for reducing your schedule to fit into the 4 month window. You have an option of hiring another contractor to help with the framing and drywall work but it will increase your budget by $200,000. Determine your best course of action for bringing this project in on schedule and update your project plan(ATTACHED) to reflect your recommendation. Develop a 5-6 slide presentation for senior management outlining your proposed solution. You are seeking approval to proceed with your new plan. Submit both your updated project plan in PDF format and your PowerPoint presentation.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The successful completion of a construction project such as the District 4 Production Warehouse Move requires meticulous planning, scheduling, and risk management. Recent developments—delays in obtaining permits and the reduction in workforce efficiency—pose significant challenges to adhering to the original project timeline. This paper analyzes the project's current status, evaluates options to mitigate delays, and proposes an optimal strategy to complete the project within the stipulated four-month period, including the updated project plan and a strategic presentation for senior management.

Current Project Status and Challenges

The project was initiated with an anticipated permit acquisition timeline of two weeks. However, unforeseen circumstances have extended this period to three weeks, adding an additional week to the original schedule. Moreover, the subcontractors responsible for framing and drywall have reported delays and will be able to release only half their workforce. Consequently, their schedules will double, further extending project timelines. These setbacks threaten the project's completion within the four-month deadline, requiring proactive adjustments.

Impact on Project Timeline and Constraints

The permit delay increases the project timeline by an extra week. The reduction in workforce efficiency doubles the duration of framing and drywall tasks. Altogether, these changes threaten to push the project beyond the four-month limit unless corrective actions are undertaken. The primary constraint is the fixed deadline established by the project sponsor, emphasizing the necessity of revising resource allocations and considering schedule compression techniques.

Options for Schedule Recovery

Two primary options emerge to address the delays:

  1. Hire additional contractors to expedite framing and drywall installation at an increased cost of $200,000.
  2. Implement schedule compression techniques such as crashing or fast-tracking, possibly by overlapping tasks or increasing work shifts, which might incur additional costs or resource strains.

Hiring additional contractors appears to be the most straightforward solution to regain critical path activities without compromising quality or safety, despite the budget increase. This approach can effectively reduce durations and bring the project back within the four-month timeline.

Proposed Solution and Justification

Given the circumstances, the optimal choice is to proceed with hiring an additional contractor for framing and drywall work. The rationale involves:

  • Reducing task durations by increasing workforce capacity, counteracting delays caused by reduced crew size.
  • Ensuring project completion within the obligated four-month window, satisfying stakeholder expectations.
  • Minimizing risks associated with schedule slippage and associated cost overruns caused by delays.

While this strategy increases the project budget by $200,000, it guarantees the timely completion, avoiding penalties, penalties, or breach of contractual obligations.

Updated Project Plan Overview

The revised project plan incorporates the following adjustments:

  • Permit acquisition extended from 2 to 3 weeks, with critical path adjustments.
  • Doubling of framing and drywall installation durations to reflect workforce reduction; mitigated by hiring additional contractors.
  • Overlapping or fast-tracking activities where feasible to minimize remaining schedule buffer.
  • Contingency plans for additional resource allocation if further delays occur.

The schedule now aligns with the targeted four-month delivery window, ensuring all tasks are sequence appropriately with the new durations and resource allocations.

Presentation to Senior Management

The presentation comprises five to six slides succinctly proposing this solution, including:

  1. Introduction and project background
  2. Summary of delays and current impacts
  3. Evaluation of options for schedule recovery
  4. Recommendation to hire additional contractor
  5. Cost implications and benefits
  6. Conclusion emphasizing schedule compliance and risk mitigation

The presentation aims to secure approval for the recommended course of action by highlighting the pros, addressing potential concerns, and demonstrating commitment to project success.

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing unforeseen delays in permits and workforce productivity is critical to maintaining project schedule. The most effective strategy combines resource augmentation with schedule adjustments, ensuring project completion within four months. This proactive approach balances cost considerations with the necessity of timely delivery, aligned with stakeholder expectations. Implementing this plan requires clear communication, diligent monitoring, and contingency planning to adapt to any further delays.

References

  • Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
  • PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) — Sixth Edition. Project Management Institute.
  • Lewis, J. P. (2019). Fundamentals of Project Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Fleming, Q., & Koppelman, J. M. (2016). Earned Value Project Management. IEEE Software, 33(4), 119-125.
  • Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2018). Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley.
  • Harrison, F. L., & Lock, D. (2018). Advanced Project Management: A Structured Approach. Gower Publishing.
  • Heldman, K. (2018). PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide. Sybex.
  • Thomas, J., & Mengel, T. (2008). Preparing Project Managers for Extreme Leadership. Project Management Journal, 39(2), 60-70.
  • Verzuh, E. (2015). The Fast Forward MBA in Project Management. Wiley.
  • Gido, J., & Clements, J. (2016). Successful Project Management. Cengage Learning.

Related Assignments