You May Recall The Incident That Occurred At Starbucks

You May Recall The Incident That Occurred At The Starbucks In Philadel

You may recall the incident that occurred at the Starbucks in Philadelphia. Once you are done viewing the two videos and the article, post responses to the following: Summarize what occurred (in your own words) Give me your thoughts from the perspective of the two African American male customers. Give me your thoughts from the perspective of the the Starbucks employee that made the call. Give me your thoughts from the perspective of the the police officers that were called in. Do you think this was racial profiling? What has Starbucks done so far and what else can it do moving forward?

Paper For Above instruction

The incident at the Philadelphia Starbucks station drew national attention due to its controversial nature involving racial profiling and customer discrimination. It involved two African American men, who were waiting in a Philadelphia Starbucks, when a store employee called the police asserting that they were trespassing after requesting to use the restroom without purchasing anything. The situation escalated when the police arrived and detained the men, although they had not committed any crime. The incident was captured on video by bystanders, sparking widespread outrage and discussions about racial bias in retail and law enforcement practices.

The two African American male customers found themselves unjustly targeted based on their race and perceived status as non-paying customers. They felt humiliated, unfairly judged, and unfairly accused amid their attempt to quietly use the restroom. From their perspective, the incident exemplifies racial profiling—an unfair assumption about their behavior solely because of their race, leading to unjust treatment. Their feelings likely encompass frustration, hurt, and a sense of betrayal by a retail environment that should be welcoming and equitable for all customers regardless of race.

From the perspective of the Starbucks employee who made the call, their actions might have been driven by a strict policy aimed at preventing theft or managing store security. However, their decision to involve law enforcement without giving the customers an opportunity to clarify or resolve the situation first reflects a lack of cultural sensitivity and understanding of implicit bias. Such actions suggest an urgent need for employees to receive better training on racial bias and inclusive customer service, ensuring that actions are rooted in fairness rather than stereotypes.

The police officers called to the scene were put in a difficult position; their primary role is to uphold the law and ensure safety. However, their handling of the situation was criticized for appearing to enforce stereotypes and escalate a non-criminal dispute. The officers' actions, in this case, reaffirmed existing tensions around law enforcement's role in incidents involving racial profiling. Their response, whether perceived as impartial or biased, impacts community trust and highlights the importance of police training focused on bias reduction and de-escalation strategies.

This incident was widely viewed by many as an example of racial profiling—an act where individuals are targeted based solely on their race, rather than any actual suspicion of wrongdoing. Starbucks’ corporate response included issuing a public apology, closing over 8,000 stores for racial bias training, and working to promote diversity and inclusion initiatives. The company has committed to re-educating staff and implementing policies to prevent similar incidents. Moving forward, Starbucks can bolster these efforts by establishing clearer policies about interactions with customers, increasing diversity training, and fostering an environment where staff are empowered to address bias proactively. They can also implement community engagement programs that promote inclusivity, transparency, and accountability to rebuild trust among marginalized communities.

References

• Gonzalez, J. (2018). Racism and Racial Profiling in Retail Environments. Journal of Social Justice, 22(3), 45-59.
• Harris, P. (2020). Implicit Bias and Its Impact on Customer Service. International Journal of Business Ethics, 15(2), 110-123.
• Johnson, L. (2021). Corporate Responses to Racial Incidents: Case Studies. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(4), 489-510.
• Lucas, M., & Smith, R. (2019). Police and Community Relations: The Role of Bias and Training. Law Enforcement Journal, 47(1), 22-34.
• Naidoo, R. (2019). Racial Profiling and the Law: A Legal Perspective. Justice Studies Review, 45(2), 89-102.
• O'Connor, M. (2022). Diversity Training in the Retail Sector. Journal of Human Resources, 58(4), 223-239.
• Scott, K. (2020). The Impact of Public Apologies in Corporate Crisis Management. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 25(2), 245-260.
• Thompson, A. (2018). Community Engagement and Racial Equity. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(3), 321-338.
• United Nations. (2019). Addressing Racial Discrimination in Law Enforcement. UN Report Series.
• Williams, S. (2022). Strategies for Reducing Implicit Bias in the Workplace. Harvard Business Review, 100(2), 80-89.