You Need To Review Two Of The Case Studies And Identify The

You Need To Review Two Of The Case Studies And Identify The Sections I

You need to review two of the case studies and identify the sections in the IEEE Code of Ethics or NSPE Code of Ethics that apply to the case, followed by a brief discussion, and finally your conclusion that responds to the question.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Ethical decision-making is fundamental in engineering and technology fields, often centered on adherence to established professional codes such as the IEEE Code of Ethics and the NSPE Code of Ethics. These codes provide guidance on honesty, integrity, responsibility, and safety, which are critical when faced with ethical dilemmas. This paper analyzes two case studies to identify the relevant ethical principles from these codes, discusses their application, and concludes with an informed judgment on the ethical issues involved.

Case Study 1: Use of Previous Code in Software Development at ABC Inc.

In the first case, Robert, an entry-level software engineer, discreetly reuses code he previously developed during an internship at a start-up company for the new hard disc controller project at ABC Inc. His manager is pleased with the performance gains, but Robert’s action raises significant ethical concerns related to intellectual property and honesty.

The IEEE Code of Ethics emphasizes the importance of honesty and integrity, explicitly stating that engineers should "avoid deceptive acts" (IEEE, 2020). Reusing code developed elsewhere without proper attribution or disclosure constitutes a breach of honesty, which can be considered misrepresentation of the work’s origin. Moreover, the NSPE Code reinforces this principle by emphasizing the engineer’s duty to "hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public," which extends to ensuring that intellectual property rights are respected and that code reuse does not violate legal or ethical standards.

Applying these principles, Robert’s decision not to inform his team about the reuse of proprietary code is ethically problematic. It might be viewed as plagiarism, which violates the fundamental obligations within both codes. The ethical obligation includes transparency about one’s work and the proper attribution of sources to maintain integrity and trustworthiness. This case underscores the importance of ethical conduct in software development, particularly regarding intellectual property rights and professional honesty.

Case Study 2: Ethical Dilemma in Quality Assurance and Falsification

In the second case, Alberto faces a conflict between following his ethical obligations and obeying his employer’s directives. His company is contracted to produce torpedo firing assemblies requiring rigorous safety testing. The CEO pressures Alberto to falsify testing documentation to save costs, threatening him with job termination if he refuses.

The IEEE Code of Ethics states that engineers should "avoid deceptive acts," "honor the safety, health, and welfare of the public," and "seek, accept, and offer honest criticism of technical work" (IEEE, 2020). Falsifying safety testing documents directly contravenes these principles, as it jeopardizes safety and involves dishonesty. The NSPE Code similarly mandates that engineers "shall avoid deceptive acts" and "act in professional and ethical manner" that preserves public safety and trust.

Alberto’s decision to refuse to falsify the documents aligns with the ethical responsibilities stipulated in these codes. Reporting this misconduct publicly or internally, if possible, may be warranted to uphold safety standards and integrity. Furthermore, his decision to resign rather than compromise ethical standards reflects commitment to professional responsibility.

Conclusion

Both case studies highlight crucial ethical considerations outlined in the IEEE and NSPE Codes of Ethics. The first case illustrates the importance of honesty and respect for intellectual property in software development. The second underscores the paramount importance of safety, honesty, and integrity in engineering practices. Ethical dilemmas such as these require adherence to professional standards, transparency, and a commitment to public welfare. Engineers and professionals must prioritize ethical principles over personal or organizational pressures to maintain the integrity of their work and protect public interest.

References

  • IEEE, "IEEE Code of Ethics," Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html
  • NSPE, "NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers," National Society of Professional Engineers, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics
  • Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (2013). Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Cengage Learning.
  • National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. The National Academies Press.
  • Louviere, J. & Islam, S. (2011). Ethical Judgments by Engineers: Conflicting Principles and Dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 531–546.
  • Becker, L. C. (2009). Engineering ethics: An industrial perspective. In Engineering Ethics (pp. 85-106). Cambridge University Press.
  • Kadir, S., & Askarany, D. (2019). Ethical dilemmas faced by engineers: An exploratory analysis. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 11(2), 251–260.
  • Kitchenham, B. A., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. EBSE Technical Report.
  • Resnik, D. B. (2018). The ethics of scientific research: A reader. Routledge.
  • Schaeffer, S. M., & Thomas, S. (2020). Ethical practice in engineering: Case studies, challenges, and solutions. Engineering Management Journal, 32(4), 203–211.

Related Assignments