You Recently Decided To Enter The World Of Politics Due To M

You Recently Decided To Enter the World of Politics Due Mostly To Your

You recently decided to enter the world of politics due mostly to your frustration with your local government’s spending that you were made aware of through the community. Your new position allows you to have input in regards to how the 10 million dollar annual budget is to be spent. You are heading up the committee to make the decision on what expenditures are approved or denied. The first submission you receive as the head of this committee is for the annual Halloween costume party. It sounds like a great time and a way to get to know many of your new colleagues.

The previous chair of this committee has already approved the expense. However, you have hesitation. You could not help but to ask yourself if this really was a good use of funds. Based on the scenario above, what would you do? Ethically, do you feel you should abide by the approval? Would you just make the payment? Explain your reasoning.

Paper For Above instruction

In the realm of local government and public administration, ethical decision-making is paramount to ensuring responsible use of public funds and maintaining public trust. As an individual newly entering political office, the dilemma presented—whether to honor an already approved expenditure for a Halloween costume party or to reconsider based on ethical considerations—highlights the importance of integrity, accountability, and prudent stewardship of taxpayer money.

Initially, respecting the prior approval might seem straightforward; deferring to the previous chair’s decision could demonstrate administrative consistency and respect for institutional authority. However, ethical leadership necessitates a deeper evaluation of the proposal's alignment with community needs and fiscal responsibility. If the expense for a Halloween costume party appears excessive, frivolous, or inconsistent with the community’s priorities—especially in the context of a constrained budget—it warrants reexamination. Politicians and public officials have a duty to allocate resources effectively, prioritizing essential services, infrastructure, education, and health initiatives that significantly impact citizens' welfare.

Furthermore, the decision must be guided by transparency and accountability. Blindly adhering to prior approvals without scrutiny could undermine ethical standards, particularly if funds might be better allocated elsewhere. Public funds should support activities that foster community engagement, social cohesion, and cultural celebration but within reasonable and justifiable limits. Conducting a cost-benefit analysis or seeking community input could help determine whether the expense is warranted or if alternative, more meaningful events could serve the same purpose at a lower cost.

From an ethical standpoint, adherence to principles like integrity, responsibility, and fairness suggests that reevaluating the expenditure is necessary, especially if the initial approval was made without comprehensive consideration or peer review. As a leader, demonstrating vigilance over fiscal stewardship not only aligns with good governance but also builds trust among constituents. If the expense is deemed wasteful or unnecessary, ethically, the appropriate course of action would be to deny or modify the request rather than approve unwarranted spending.

In conclusion, while respecting previous decisions is often part of organizational protocol, ethical leadership requires actively scrutinizing expenditures to ensure they align with community interests and fiscal responsibility. If the Halloween costume party expense seems unjustified, withholding or renegotiating the expenditure would reflect a commitment to responsible governance and ethical integrity, ultimately fostering public trust and prudent use of limited resources.

References

• Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2015). The pursuit of virtue in public administration. Routledge.
• Kettunen, P. (2015). Ethics and integrity in public administration. Routledge.
• Cooper, T. L. (2012). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role. John Wiley & Sons.
• Lewis, C. W., & Gilman, S. (2017). Public administration: An introduction. Routledge.
• Stoker, G. (2010). Democracy and political efficiency. Routledge.
• Kovach, R., & Owens, J. J. (2003). The ethical dimensions of public administration. CRC Press.
• Frederickson, H. G., & Johnson, G. A. (2000). Meeting the ethical challenges of public service. Sharpe.
• Shafritz, J. M., & Hyde, A. C. (2016). Classics of public administration. Cengage Learning.
• Turner, M. T. (2014). Responsible government and accountability. Routledge.
• Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373.