You Will Apply Economic Principles Presented In Week 203981

You Will Apply Economic Principles Presented In Weeks One Through Thre

You will apply economic principles presented in Weeks One through Three in this week's assignment. Your assignment will be reviewed by your peers and by your facilitator in week five and should be revised as necessary based on feedback as the first part of the final assignment in week six. Select a new, realistic good or service for an existing industry. Write the economic analysis section of a business proposal. This will include statements about the market structure and the elasticity of demand for the good or service, based on textbook principles.

You need to create hypothetical data, based on similar real-world products, to estimate fixed and variable costs. Required elements include:

  • Identify market structure
  • Identify elasticity of the product
  • Provide rationale for:
  • How will pricing relate to elasticity of your product?
  • How will changes in the quantity supplied as a result of your pricing decisions affect marginal cost and marginal revenue?
  • Besides your pricing decisions, what are your suggested non-pricing strategies?
  • What non-pricing strategies will you use to increase barriers to entry?
  • How could changes in your business operations alter the mix of fixed and variable costs in line with your strategy?

Your proposal must be consistent with APA guidelines. Use credible references, such as McConnell et al. (2009), and develop original, plagiarism-free content. This assignment requires detailed economic analysis supported by hypothetical data, demonstrating understanding of market structure, demand elasticity, pricing strategies, and barriers to entry within a realistic industry context.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

In the current dynamic economic environment, understanding market structures and demand elasticity is vital for developing effective business strategies. This paper presents an economic analysis of a hypothetical new electric scooter for the urban transportation industry. The analysis encompasses market structure, demand elasticity, pricing and non-pricing strategies, and operational considerations to optimize market positioning and profitability.

Market Description and Structure

The chosen product, a compact electric scooter designed for urban commuters, belongs to the transportation device industry. Based on the analysis of similar products, the market structure resembles monopolistic competition, characterized by many competitors offering differentiated but similar products, free entry and exit, and some control over prices (McConnell et al., 2009). Differentiation is based on factors such as battery range, design, brand reputation, and technological features. The industry's competitive landscape includes established brands like Xiaomi, Segway, and Razor, with new entrants seeking to capture niche markets.

Demand Elasticity

Demand elasticity measures how sensitive consumers are to price changes. For the electric scooter, the price elasticity of demand is estimated based on consumer surveys and sales data from similar products. Given the availability of substitutes and the relatively low switching costs, the elasticity of demand is moderately elastic, estimated at approximately -1.2. This indicates that a 1% increase in price would lead to around a 1.2% decrease in quantity demanded. Such a demand profile suggests that pricing adjustments can significantly influence sales volume and revenue (McConnell et al., 2009).

Pricing Strategy and Elasticity

Understanding the elastic nature of demand informs the pricing strategy. Since demand is somewhat elastic, price skimming or premium pricing might not be optimal; instead, a competitive pricing approach is advisable. Lowering prices slightly could increase quantity demanded substantially, potentially leading to higher total revenue and market share. Conversely, raising prices could diminish sales volume without proportionately increasing margins, given the elastic demand.

Impact of Pricing on Marginal Cost and Revenue

Changes in quantity supplied resulting from pricing decisions directly influence marginal revenue (MR). In a monopolistically competitive market, MR is less than the price due to product differentiation and the downward-sloping demand curve. A decrease in price to increase sales volume could lead to a decline in MR, which must be balanced against potential increases in total revenue. Operationally, higher sales volume may marginally increase variable costs due to greater production and distribution expenses, but fixed costs remain unchanged in the short term. Strategic pricing must consider the marginal cost (MC) to avoid losses and maximize profit margins (McConnell et al., 2009).

Non-Pricing Strategies

To complement pricing strategies, several non-pricing tactics are crucial. Differentiation through superior product features, such as longer battery life, lighter weight, and enhanced safety, can attract and retain customers. Building brand loyalty through after-sales service, warranty offerings, and engaging marketing campaigns strengthens market position. Additionally, forming strategic alliances with urban transit authorities or corporate fleet programs can provide steady revenue streams and reinforce barriers to new entrants.

Strategies to Increase Barriers to Entry

Barriers to entry are essential to ensure sustained competitive advantage. The company can invest in proprietary technology, like innovative battery management systems, to establish patents. High initial capital investment in R&D and manufacturing facilitates economies of scale and secures a competitive moat. Establishing strong distribution channels and brand recognition further deters prospective competitors from entering the market. Regulatory compliance and safety certifications can also serve as significant entry barriers, especially in markets with stringent standards (Porter, 1980).

Operational Changes and Cost Structure

Operational flexibility allows the company to adapt cost structures aligned with strategic goals. For instance, shifting from fixed-cost-intensive manufacturing to contract manufacturing can reduce fixed costs and increase variable costs, providing scalability during demand fluctuations. Implementing lean production techniques, automation, and just-in-time inventory management can optimize costs, enhance quality, and improve responsiveness to market changes. These operational modifications can influence the fixed-variable cost mix to support aggressive growth strategies or cost containment as needed.

Conclusion

The economic analysis demonstrates that understanding market structure and demand elasticity is instrumental in shaping effective pricing and non-pricing strategies. In this scenario, operating within a monopolistically competitive environment, leveraging product differentiation and strategic barriers to entry can sustain competitive advantage. Proper cost management and operational agility further enhance profitability. By integrating these economic principles, the company can position itself favorably within the urban transportation industry, maximizing revenue while maintaining cost efficiency.

References

  • McConnell, Campbell R., Stanley L. Brue, and Sean Masaki Flynn. (2009). Economics, 18th Edition. McGraw-Hill Learning Solutions.
  • Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press.
  • Krugman, P., & Wells, R. (2018). Economics (5th ed.). Worth Publishers.
  • Hirschleifer, J., & Sindler, R. (1992). Price Theory and Applications. Pearson.
  • Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2013). Microeconomics, 8th Edition. Pearson.
  • Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (2010). Economics, 19th Edition. McGraw-Hill.
  • Gordon, R. J. (2016). The Rise and Fall of American Growth. Princeton University Press.
  • Schmalensee, R., & Willig, R. D. (1989). Industrial Economics: Theory and Evidence. MIT Press.
  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Economics of the Public Sector. W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy. Cambridge University Press.

Related Assignments