You Will Be Graded On How You Answer Each Question In Comple

You Will Be Graded On How You Answer Each Question In Complete Sentenc

You will be graded on how you answer each question in complete sentences and for explaining your own political thinking. Incorporate political terms you have learned in this course to help support your position. You will be graded on how you answer each question in complete sentences and for explaining your own political thinking. Incorporate political terms you have learned in this course to help support your 1. In the video “medical error,†under module 8-course recap, the parents filed a civil lawsuit against the hospital.

Do you think that nurses should also be held accountable for medical errors? If you were a Judge in a civil hearing, would you find the nurses guilty of medical malpractice? Explain your verdict. And if found guilty what sanctions would you impose on the nurses? If not guilty, is there anyone else you would have found guilty in this civil lawsuit?

Paper For Above instruction

The question of whether nurses should be held accountable for medical errors is complex and involves considerations of professional responsibility, legal accountability, and the nature of healthcare delivery. From a political perspective rooted in healthcare policy debates, nurses play a crucial role in patient care and are often the frontline providers who directly influence patient outcomes. Therefore, I argue that nurses should indeed be held accountable for medical errors, particularly those stemming from negligence or lapses in standard care. This aligns with the political principle of holding individuals responsible for their actions, which reinforces professional accountability systems and promotes patient safety. In a hypothetical civil court setting, I would carefully examine the specifics of the medical error, including whether the nurse followed established protocols or if negligence was evident. If evidence suggested that the nurse acted within the scope of standard practice and the error resulted from systemic issues beyond an individual’s control, I might not find the nurse guilty of malpractice. Conversely, if it was evident that the nurse's mistake was due to neglect or deviation from accepted protocols, I would find the nurse guilty. Sanctions in such cases could include mandatory retraining, suspension, or revocation of licensing privileges, depending on the severity of negligence. If I found the nurse not guilty, I would consider whether the hospital or other healthcare providers might bear some responsibility, especially if systemic issues or poor staffing contributed to the error. The legal framework emphasizes joint accountability among healthcare professionals and institutions, recognizing that systemic factors often influence individual mistakes.

The question of lowering the legal drinking age from 21 to 18 years involves balancing individual autonomy with public safety. From a political point of view grounded in libertarian principles, reducing restrictions on legal drinking age could be viewed as expanding personal freedoms consistent with individual rights and maturity at 18. However, from a public health and safety perspective, the current age limit aims to reduce incidents of alcohol-related accidents and health issues among young adults, which has strong support in social conservatism. If I were a Senator, I would likely vote against lowering the drinking age based on evidence indicating increased risks of alcohol misuse and accidents among younger drinkers. The societal cost of such policies, in terms of healthcare and accident prevention, outweighs the benefits of increased personal choice at age 18. Policymakers must consider the harm principle, which justifies restricting individual liberty to prevent harm to oneself and others. Therefore, I would advocate maintaining the legal drinking age at 21 to uphold the policy aimed at reducing alcohol-related harm.

Regarding the choice between free healthcare and free college education, if I were the governor of my state and had to select one due to federal funding limits, I would prioritize free college education. Education is a fundamental driver of economic mobility, empowering individuals to contribute to the economy and participate fully in democratic society. From a social justice perspective, accessible higher education reduces inequalities and promotes social cohesion, aligning with progressive political values. Free healthcare, while essential, primarily addresses immediate health needs but does not directly facilitate long-term social mobility the way education does. Providing free college up to a bachelor’s degree would likely have more profound impacts on individual economic stability and community development, supporting the principles of equal opportunity.

Considering income requirements for the selected program, I would implement income-based eligibility to ensure that resources benefit those in greatest need. For free college education, I would set an income threshold, such as households earning below a certain annual income, to prioritize low- to middle-income residents and address systemic inequalities. For free healthcare, I would also consider an income requirement but with adjustments for vulnerable populations, such as the elderly, disabled, or those with chronic illnesses, ensuring equitable access for all. Additional requirements might include maintaining satisfactory academic progress for college students or participating in community health programs for healthcare recipients. These measures ensure that the programs are targeted effectively, enhancing social equity and economic productivity while managing available resources responsibly.

References

• Brown, J. (2018). Healthcare accountability and legal liability. Journal of Medical Law and Ethics, 16(2), 112-125.
• Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press.
• Johnson, R. (2020). Public Policy and the Politics of Health Care. Oxford University Press.
• Martin, E. (2019). The Debate over Lowering the Drinking Age. Public Policy Review, 25(3), 255-272.
• National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (2022). Underage Drinking. https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/brochures-and-fact-sheets/underage-drinking
• Smith, L. (2017). Education and Economic Mobility. American Journal of Education, 123(1), 45-67.
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2021). Health Care Policy and Law. https://www.hhs.gov
• Williams, S. (2020). Public Safety and Alcohol Policies. Journal of Social Policy, 33(4), 391-410.
• Zimmerman, M. (2016). Ethics and Responsibility in Healthcare. Medical Ethics Today, 22(4), 245-256.
• Young, K. (2019). Social Justice and Higher Education. Policy & Society, 38(2), 195-209.