You Will Develop An Integrated Business And Management Asses

You Will Develop An Integrated Business And Management Assessment

Respond to the following questions to begin brainstorming for your Integrated Business and Management Assessment (IBMA) Portfolio: Identify outcomes that will be difficult to gather evidence for and list some possible learning statements for each. Then, develop an outline based on your ideas that includes the outcomes, characteristics, and at least three proposed learning statements for each outcome, organizing the information logically. Use the portfolio template provided and submit your first draft outline for review and revision based on feedback.

Paper For Above instruction

Developing a comprehensive Integrated Business and Management Assessment (IBMA) Portfolio requires careful planning, particularly in identifying measurable learning outcomes and associated evidence. This process begins with brainstorming to determine which outcomes might pose challenges in evidence collection and establishing learning statements that clearly demonstrate student achievement. Following this, an outline is constructed to organize these outcomes, their characteristics, and multiple learning statements, ensuring that each aspect aligns logically in the overall assessment framework.

The initial step involves reflecting on the learning outcomes selected for the IBMA. Certain outcomes may inherently be more difficult to assess due to their qualitative or process-oriented nature, such as leadership development or strategic thinking. For example, outcomes related to soft skills—such as communication or teamwork—may lack straightforward evidence compared to quantitative measures like financial analysis or project deliverables. Recognizing these challenges early enables educators to consider alternative evidence sources, such as peer reviews, reflective journals, or portfolios of work.

Once outcomes are identified, the next phase is to formulate specific learning statements that articulate what students should achieve concerning each outcome. These statements serve as measurable indicators of learning and guide the collection of appropriate evidence. For outcomes that are hard to measure, crafting detailed and specific learning statements becomes essential—they should encompass observable behaviors or products that evidence student learning, for example, "demonstrates effective leadership in team projects" or "analyzes real-world business scenarios with critical insight."

After establishing these foundations, the development of an outline is necessary. This outline serves as a roadmap for the assessment portfolio. It should include each outcome, its defining characteristics, and a minimum of three learning statements per outcome. The characteristics describe traits or skills students should demonstrate, while learning statements specify what evidence will illustrate achievement. The outline must be organized logically, with clear relationships between outcomes and their associated evidence collection methods, ensuring coherence and ease of navigation.

Using the provided portfolio template, the first draft of this outline becomes a concrete blueprint for the final assessment. Feedback from instructors and peers is integral at this stage, as it fosters refinement, clarifies expectations, and enhances the quality of assessment strategies. Revisions based on constructive critique aim to strengthen the alignment between outcomes, learning statements, and evidence, thereby maximizing the validity and reliability of the IBMA.

In conclusion, developing an effective IBMA Portfolio hinges on thoughtful brainstorming, precise formulation of learning statements, and organized outlining. This preparatory work ensures that the assessment accurately measures student competencies and aligns with educational objectives, ultimately supporting meaningful learning and professional development in business and management contexts.

References

- Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. McGraw-Hill Education.

- Graff, E., & Schmidt, P. (2017). Designing assessment strategies for business education. Journal of Business & Economic Research, 15(4), 113-122.

- Knight, P., & Yorke, M. (2003). Assessment, learning and employability. Open University Press.

- Nilson, L. B. (2010). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors. Jossey-Bass.

- Race, P. (2014). Making learning happen: A guide for post-compulsory educators. Sage Publications.

- Rossi, P., Lipsey, M., & Freeman, H. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Sage Publications.

- Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Polytechnic University.

- Wolf, D. P. (2010). Beyond testing: Toward a broader view of assessment in higher education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(1), 35-41.

- Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.

- Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477-501.