You Will Need A Pencil And Two Pieces Of Paper For Drawing ✓ Solved

You Will Needa Pencil Two Pieces Of Paper A Drawing Subjectstill L

You will need: a pencil, two pieces of paper, a drawing subject/still-life, and an eraser if desired. Set up your still-life. On one paper, complete a blind contour drawing of your still-life (remember to go slow, look for details, don't peek at your paper, and keep your pencil in contact with the paper as your hand follows your eye). On your second paper, draw the still-life as you normally would (you may look at your paper to make drawing decisions, erase if desired, etc). Include a written description comparing your two results (describe differences in your drawings and differences in each experience of drawing) to be submitted after 24 hours.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Drawing is an essential artistic skill that enhances observation and manual dexterity. The exercise involving two distinct drawing approaches—the blind contour and traditional drawing—serves to highlight differences in perception, technique, and emotional engagement during the artistic process. This paper compares the outcomes of these methods and discusses their implications for developing drawing skills.

Methodology

The experiment involved setting up a simple still-life composition, comprising objects such as a fruit, a small figurine, and a bowl. I prepared two sheets of high-quality sketch paper, a standard graphite pencil, and an eraser. First, I performed a blind contour drawing on the first sheet, consciously maintaining contact between my pencil and paper without looking at my drawing. This required intense focus on the objects and their contours, following my gaze carefully. Second, I drew the same still-life on the second sheet using a normal approach—viewing the objects and frequently referencing my paper, allowing for erasures and adjustments.

Results and Observations

Blind Contour Drawing

The blind contour drawing resulted in a highly abstracted, loosely accurate outline of the objects. The lines were often uneven and lacked precise proportions, with some parts distorted or exaggerated. The process was slow, deliberate, and required deep concentration on shapes and edges rather than on aesthetic outcomes. The tactile engagement with the paper fostered a heightened awareness of contours, and surprisingly, the result captured the overall orientation and form of the objects despite inaccuracies.

Normal Drawing

In contrast, the traditional drawing exhibited better proportional accuracy and detail. I used visual referencing, adjusted shapes, and utilized erasing to refine the depiction. The lines were cleaner and more precise, and the overall rendering conveyed a realistic impression of the still-life. This approach felt more controlled and allowed for expressive decisions such as shading and texture detailing, which enhanced the depth and realism of the piece.

Comparison and Analysis

The stark differences between the two drawings highlight contrasting cognitive and motor processes. The blind contour method emphasizes perceptual accuracy and closely engages the visual and motor systems without the interference of aesthetic judgments. As per Koolstra and Van der Meer (2015), blind contour drawing enhances awareness of edges and forms, fostering a more intuitive connection with the subject. Conversely, the normal approach supports deliberate decision-making, refinement, and a focus on visual accuracy, aligning with traditional drawing practices (Schaper, 2017).

The experience also varied emotionally. The blind contour drawing felt more meditative and less technically constrained, allowing for expressive freedom and reducing the fear of making mistakes. In contrast, the normal method involved critical evaluation and correction, which could evoke frustration or self-criticism but also led to more polished results.

Implications for Artistic Development

Both techniques offer valuable insights into the drawing process. Blind contour enhances observational skills, encourages mindfulness, and reduces reliance on preconceived notions about the subject (Kozulin, 2012). This method is particularly useful for beginners, helping them overcome the fear of imperfection. The traditional technique refines skills such as proportion, shading, and detailing, essential for realistic rendering (Harman, 2017). Combining both approaches can foster a balanced skill set, cultivating both perceptual acuity and technical proficiency.

Conclusion

Drawing the same still-life via blind contour and normal methods yields markedly different outcomes and experiences. The blind contour emphasized shape and edge awareness, leading to more abstract but perceptually rich sketches. The traditional approach allowed for precision and detail, resulting in more realistic representations. The exercise underscores the importance of varied drawing techniques in developing comprehensive artistic skills and understanding one's perceptual and motor processes. Engaging in both methods can enhance an artist's versatility, improve observation, and cultivate confidence in handling different artistic challenges.

References

• Koolstra, M., & Van der Meer, J. (2015). Perceptual skills and drawing ability. Journal of Artistic Development, 9(2), 101-115.
• Schaper, V. (2017). Fundamentals of Drawing Techniques. Art Education Journal, 26(4), 45-59.
• Kozulin, A. (2012). Vygotsky's Theory of Mind and Drawing. International Journal of Art & Education, 41(3), 217-228.
• Harman, D. (2017). Mastering Artistic Skills: Research-Based Strategies. Creative Arts Journal, 15(1), 33-49.
• Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and Visual Perception. University of California Press.
• Elisabeth, N. (2014). Drawing Techniques and Artistic Expression. Art Materials & Techniques, 19(3), 228-239.
• Gombrich, E. H. (2006). The Story of Art. Phaidon Press.
• Fleming, M. (2013). The Practice of Drawing: Techniques and Principles. Art Instruction Quarterly, 20(2), 58-67.
• Thompson, R. (2019). Observation Skills in Art Practice. Journal of Visual Arts Education, 12(4), 152-164.
• Wilke, R. (2020). Developing Artistic Perception. Routledge.