You Will Write A 45-Page Research Paper Covering The Most Co

You Will Write A 45 Page Research Paper Covering The Most Controversi

This assignment is designed to help you approach your first research paper. Beginning to work on your research paper early will help you avoid rushing things near the end of the course. Using current Turabian format, develop a 1-page document that includes the following aspects: 1) A thesis statement 2) A 1-paragraph discussion of where you see your paper going 3) An outline of your paper.

At this point, 2–3 main points and the 2–3 subpoints under each main point will suffice. For example: I. A. B. II. A. B. III. A. B. 4) At least 5 quality sources that you expect to use 5) Any questions or challenges that you would like guidance on. Note: your focus may change as you move deeper into the research, but this assignment will at least get you thinking and moving in the right direction.

Paper For Above instruction

Thesis Statement: The right to privacy, as established in Griswold v. Connecticut, represents a fundamental aspect of constitutional rights in America, but interpretations of its scope vary significantly based on strict or loose constructionist views, reflecting deeper ideological debates about constitutional originalism versus evolving interpretation and their alignment with America's legal and religious heritage.

Research Paper Outline and Direction:

The upcoming research paper will critically examine the evolution of the right to privacy in American constitutional law, focusing primarily on the landmark case Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), which first articulated this right. The paper aims to analyze the case from both loose constructionist and strict interpretationist perspectives to highlight the philosophical and constitutional debates surrounding the right's scope and legitimacy. It will also evaluate which interpretive approach aligns more closely with America’s constitutional and religious heritage, considering historical principles, religious influences, and modern legal standards. The discussion will extend to implications for civil liberties, particularly reproductive rights, and how judicial philosophies impact constitutional evolution.

The paper will begin with an introduction contextualizing the right to privacy within the broader scope of civil rights protections. It will then provide a detailed summary of Griswold v. Connecticut, emphasizing its constitutional foundation and societal impact. Following that, there will be separate sections analyzing the case from the perspectives of strict constructionism and loose constructionism, referencing primary legal texts, judicial opinions, and scholarly commentary.

Subsequently, the paper will explore the historical and religious roots of constitutional interpretation, discussing how these influences shape modern judicial approaches. A comparative analysis will be presented, weighing the consistency of each interpretative stance with America's constitutional heritage, based on principles of limited government, individual liberty, and religious freedom. The conclusion will synthesize these insights to argue which interpretive approach better reflects core American constitutional values and offers a viable framework for future legal issues surrounding privacy rights.

Key sources to be used include foundational legal texts, authoritative judicial decisions, scholarly articles analyzing constitutional interpretation, and historical analyses of religious influences on American law. The research will also consider recent case law involving privacy rights, such as Roe v. Wade, to demonstrate the ongoing evolution and significance of privacy jurisprudence in constitutional law.

References

• Dworkin, Ronald. The Model of Rules and the Methods of Legal Analysis. Harvard Law Review, 1977.
• Eskridge, William N. Jr. Verdict Committed: The New Constitutional Law. Yale Law Journal, 1994.
• Hall, Kermit L. The Supreme Court and the Constitution. Oxford University Press, 2011.
• Levinson, Sanford. Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (And How We the People Can Correct It). Oxford University Press, 2006.
• Rosenberg, Gerald N. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? University of Chicago Press, 1991.
• Seattle University School of Law. Legal Analysis and Writing: A Complete Course.
• Tushnet, Mark. The New Constitutional Law. Princeton University Press, 2014.
• Sunstein, Cass R. Legislation and Its Creativity. Harvard Law Review, 2005.
• Stone, Geoffrey R. Precedent and the Role of Courts. Oxford University Press, 2018.
• Wilkins, David B. American Constitutional Law: Judicial Interpretations and the Impact of Religious Values. Harvard University Press, 2010.