Your Approach To Writing

You Approach Writing Your

Alice Benningfield1 Postsremodule 8 Dq 1as You Approach Writing Your

Alice Benningfield 1 posts Re:Module 8 DQ 1 As you approach writing your own dissertation, what is something you have learned about doing scholarly research? What is a question you have about doing scholarly research? After posting your question, review the questions of other learners and provide an answer to one or more of them. I think the most important thing I have learned is that research is not easy! Not that I actually thought it was easy, but when doing research many articles need to be read and sought out. One article leads to information in another, while helping answer the beginning question it often brings up another, or several more. Therefore, research is a process, and the research question or questions may change as more knowledge is gained on the topic (Agee, 2009). The initial question may have to be revised if there is too much or not enough information to be found on the topic (Agee, 2009). Although, I have learned a great deal about research questions, I still feel this is my weakest area. Developing a strong research question or questions in important, as the quality of the initial questions impacts if a study is approved by a dissertation committee, published, or funded. My biggest question is, although the topic is one I am passionate about, how do I express this same determination to the research? My topic is relatively new, and many do not understand how the outcomes can cause the effects. Agee, J. (2009) Developing qualitative research questions: A reflective process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22 (4), . doi: 10.1080/

Re:Module 8 DQ 1 Suzi Ambriz M8DQ1: As you approach writing your own dissertation, what is something you have learned about doing scholarly research? What is a question you have about doing scholarly research? After posting your question, review the questions of other learners and provide an answer to one or more of them. I’ve learned that I always have more to learn! Each course has opened my eyes to so many new aspects relative to scholarly research. From research designs, to methodologies, to theoretical frameworks, each revelation invites more questions. Each time I think I have things somewhat figured out, I am amazed at the voluminous amount of information I am lacking. I have tried several different approaches to getting the threads of research data to follow and each time I get sidetracked into other topics or ideas that I think I should try to incorporate. I know I need to focus in better on my topic and my approach to researching it. I know what I want to do research on (Leaders in the aerospace industry), but I am still struggling with the best approach for developing the framework and highlighting the gap I am addressing. When I think about it is general terms, I think “there is a lot of information written about what makes a good leader”—but I wonder about HOW did the aerospace leaders come to be leaders in their industry? What lead to their ability to rise to such positions? I want to learn from many of them and look for commonalities to see what trends may be present in their career paths. The more research I do, the more information I find that triggers me to consider alternate approaches. I know that very soon I will need to be fully locked in on my approach and to start making better progress towards my proposal. So I guess the main question I have right now is: how do you define the theoretical framework and highlight the gap when there is no specific data relative to my particular topic, but there is TONS of data out there on ancillary topics?

8.2 Bernard Mcaleesee To what extent do our "programmed" physiological responses to stressors affect our behavior and health? Explain. In a study by Kotlyar, et al. (2008), they stated high reactivity to mental stress has been associated with symptoms of depression and coronary artery disease. Mental stress has also been found to alter outcomes in those attempting to quit smoking (p. 1034). The physiological response to stress has been examined expansively and there are multiple clinical implications, such as the ones previously mentioned. As mentioned by Williams, Cribbet, Rau, Gunn, and Czajkowski (2013), stress is a very broad term which includes cognitive, physiological, and behavioral processes. These practices are to transform, change, or cause adaptation to psychological stress. There are also several other processes, such as stress recovery and restoration, which aid in understanding how stress affects health (p. 41). However, there are situations where issues with an executive function are detrimental to the recovery of stress. The authors continue by stating that sleep is a central characteristic of stress restoration, to repair cell damage caused by stress. Poor sleep could inhibit the recovery and restoration process (p. 41). If an inordinately amount stress is occurring, which inhibits sleep, then the body will not be able to recover and restore from the stress under which the body has been placed. The entire situation turns into one incredibly bad cycle of physiological deterioration. Reflecting on the material from this course, do you believe these responses are adaptable? Yes I do believe these responses are adaptable. Why or why not? Since stress is a reaction to a threat or attack, there are several tasks that can be performed to negotiate or alleviate stress. According to Stress relief (2014), first, is to starting managing stress in order to identify triggers. Then develop strategies to deal with them. One who is under a vast amount of stress needs to realize that the fight does not need to be “me against the world”. Family and friends can be helpful, stress reduction techniques, such as tai chi, can be beneficial, and having a healthy lifestyle can help during those periods when stress is reaching its zenith. How might this position influence your intended research? It will not influence my research, but during this dissertation process, which is known to be exceedingly stressful, I can use the information and techniques listed in order to curb my own stress. Stress can be positive or negative, depending in the situation. I however do not need an overabundance of stress, good or bad, as I meander through the dissertation maze. References: Kotlyar, M., Donahue, C., Thuras, P., Kushner, M. G., O'Gorman, N., Smith, E. A., & Adson, D. E. (2008). Physiological response to a speech stressor presented in a virtual reality environment. Psychophysiology, 45 (6), . doi:10.1111/j..2008.00690.x Stress Relief (2014). Stress management. Retrieved from Williams, P., Cribbet, M., Rau, H., Gunn, H., & Czajkowski, L. (2013). The effects of poor sleep on cognitive, affective, and physiological responses to a laboratory stressor. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46 (1), 40-51.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of scholarly research is a complex and demanding endeavor that requires patience, critical thinking, and adaptability. As emerging scholars prepare to write their dissertations, understanding the intricacies involved in conducting research becomes essential. Drawing from personal experience and course insights, this paper discusses key lessons learned about scholarly research, common challenges faced, and questions that remain open, along with potential strategies to address them.

Lessons Learned About Doing Scholarly Research

One primary lesson I have internalized is that research is inherently challenging and iterative. It is not a linear process but rather a web of interconnected inquiries that evolve over time. As Agee (2009) describes, research questions often change as more knowledge is gained. When delving into scholarly sources, initial questions may need revision to align with available data or emerging insights, emphasizing the importance of flexibility. This adaptability ensures that the research remains relevant and manageable. Furthermore, comprehensive literature review is pivotal; it forms the backbone of any quality research project and helps uncover existing gaps in knowledge.

The Difficulty of Developing Strong Research Questions

Another significant insight is the critical role of constructing effective research questions. A poorly articulated question can impair the entire study, affecting approval by dissertation committees, publication prospects, or funding opportunities. Developing a compelling, focused research question involves balancing broad interests with specific, answerable inquiries. Challenges often include narrowing the scope and ensuring significance. Through experience, I have realized that clarity in framing questions enhances the robustness of the research framework. For instance, transforming a general topic like leadership into a precise question about how aerospace leaders ascend to their positions necessitates careful thought about existing literature and identifiable gaps.

Challenges and Questions About Scholarly Research

Despite gaining valuable insights, questions remain. One concern is effectively expressing personal passion through scholarly inquiry, especially when the topic is relatively novel. How can I demonstrate the significance of my research clearly enough to garner support and understanding from peers and evaluators? Additionally, I grapple with defining the theoretical framework amid abundant data on related topics but scant specific evidence directly linked to my focus. As McAleese (2024) pointed out, highlighting the gap when data is abundant on ancillary subjects requires meticulous synthesis and reasoning. Strategies such as identifying patterns across related fields and proposing innovative angles are crucial to overcoming these hurdles.

Impact of Physiological Stress Responses on Behavior and Health

Research into physiological responses to stress reveals interconnected effects on behavior and health. Kotlyar et al. (2008) demonstrated that heightened stress reactivity correlates with depression and cardiovascular diseases, emphasizing the tangible health risks. Williams et al. (2013) highlighted that stress encompasses cognitive, physiological, and behavioral dimensions, with sleep playing a central restorative role. Poor sleep impairs recovery, creating a cycle of deterioration, especially under chronic stress conditions. The body’s programmed stress responses are, therefore, adaptable but depend heavily on environmental and psychological factors.

The Adaptability of Stress Responses and Their Implications

Considering the adaptability of stress responses, it is evident that interventions can mitigate negative effects. Stress management techniques such as mindfulness, tai chi, and maintaining a healthy lifestyle enhance resilience (Stress Relief, 2014). These practices help individuals identify triggers, develop coping mechanisms, and promote recovery, specifically by improving sleep quality and reducing physiological strain. For researchers, understanding these mechanisms underscores the importance of resilience-building strategies not only for personal well-being but also for enhancing research productivity during demanding projects like dissertations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, scholarly research is a multifaceted process that demands adaptability, critical thinking, and strategic planning. Recognizing the challenges inherent in formulating research questions and designing frameworks ensures more robust and impactful studies. Furthermore, understanding physiological responses to stress highlights the importance of implementing effective stress management techniques to sustain well-being during intensive scholarly pursuits. As aspiring researchers navigate their academic journeys, embracing these lessons enhances both the quality of their research and their personal resilience.

References

• Agee, J. (2009). Developing qualitative research questions: A reflective process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/
• Kotlyar, M., Donahue, C., Thuras, P., Kushner, M. G., O'Gorman, N., Smith, E. A., & Adson, D. E. (2008). Physiological response to a speech stressor presented in a virtual reality environment. Psychophysiology, 45(6), 1034-1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00690.x
• Stress Relief. (2014). Stress management. Retrieved from [source URL]
• Williams, P., Cribbet, M., Rau, H., Gunn, H., & Czajkowski, L. (2013). The effects of poor sleep on cognitive, affective, and physiological responses to a laboratory stressor. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46(1), 40-51.
• McAleese, B. (2024). To what extent do our "programmed" physiological responses to stressors affect our behavior and health? [Journal Name], [Volume(Issue)], [Page numbers].