Your Implicit Association Test Results And The Role Of Sensa

Your Implicit Association Test Results and the Role of Sensation, Perception, and Consciousness

The purpose of this paper is to analyze my results from the Implicit Association Test (IAT) on race, which indicated a moderate automatic preference for African Americans over European Americans. While I may not fully comprehend the reasons behind these results, I will use relevant psychological concepts from chapters 3 and 4, specifically focusing on sensation, perception, and consciousness, to explore potential influences. This analysis aims to understand how subconscious processes and perceptual mechanisms could contribute to the biases reflected in my IAT outcomes.

Understanding the IAT Results through Sensation and Perception

Sensation and perception are foundational processes through which we interpret our environment. Sensation involves the initial detection of stimuli through sensory receptors, while perception is the interpretation of these stimuli within our brain (Page 85). In the context of racial biases, perceptual processes can influence the way we unconsciously respond to racial groups, possibly contributing to implicit preferences. For example, perceptual set—a tendency to perceive stimuli in a particular way based on expectations—could predispose individuals, including myself, to associate certain racial groups with specific stereotypes or qualities (Page 95).

My results indicating a moderate preference might stem partly from bottom-up processing, where sensory input—such as visual cues associated with race—interacts with pre-existing mental frameworks. This processing might activate automatic stereotypes that influence my responses. Additionally, sensation plays a role because external stimuli—images, sounds, cultural signals—stimulate sensory receptors that feed into perceptual systems, subtly shaping preferences without conscious awareness.

The Influence of Consciousness and Automatic Processes

Consciousness, particularly the stream of consciousness that continuously runs through our mind, shapes how we process social information. According to theories of consciousness, much of our day-to-day mental activity occurs beneath conscious awareness (Page 126). Automatic processes operate effortlessly and outside conscious control, often driving our reactions to social stimuli (Page 130). These automatic processes can generate biases based on learned societal cues, stereotypes, or environmental influences.

In terms of my IAT results, automatic processes might have contributed significantly. These processes enable rapid associations—such as linking certain racial groups with specific attributes—which are formed through repeated exposure over time. These unconscious thoughts and associations can influence my responses during the test without me actively deliberating on them (Page 131). Therefore, my moderate preference may reflect the strength of these automatic associations ingrained through societal and cultural experiences.

How Sensation, Perception, and Consciousness Interact to Shape Racial Preferences

The interaction between sensation, perception, and consciousness creates a complex web influencing implicit biases. Sensory receptors gather information about the environment—such as visual cues of race—that is processed subconsciously through bottom-up pathways. This information then interacts with perceptual sets and schemas, which are shaped by past experiences and cultural conditioning (Page 86, 95). These mental frameworks affect perception, making certain stimuli more salient or meaningful.

Moreover, consciousness—particularly the divided or altered states—can modulate how these biases manifest. For example, during automatic processing, the brain operates in a divided consciousness mode, allowing quick, subconscious reactions to social stimuli (Page 130). Sleep and dream states, as aspects of altered consciousness, also influence how societal norms and stereotypes are reinforced and processed subconsciously. The activation-synthesis theory suggests that during REM sleep, the brain consolidates social information, possibly strengthening biases encoded earlier (Page 145).

Conclusion

In summary, the results of my Implicit Association Test can be partially explained through the lens of sensation, perception, and consciousness. Sensory input received through environmental stimuli interacts with perceptual mechanisms shaped by societal experiences, forming automatic associations. These associations, processed unconsciously through automatic processes and divided consciousness states, influence my responses. Recognizing the role of these mechanisms underscores the importance of conscious efforts to challenge implicit biases and highlights how perceptual and subconscious processes contribute to social attitudes. Future awareness and deliberate reflection may help mitigate these automatic preferences, fostering more equitable social interactions.

References

• Goldstein, E. B. (2019). Sensation and Perception (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Carroll, J. S., & Johnson, R. A. (2018). Theories of Mind and Consciousness in Social Psychology. Journal of Social Psychology, 158(2), 150-165.
• Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The Unbearable Automaticity of Being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462-479.
• LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. Simon & Schuster.
• Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480.
• Siegel, D. J. (2012). The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are. Guilford Publications.
• Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987). The N1 Wave of the Human Electric and Magnetic Response to Sound: A Review and an Analysis of the Component Structure. Psychophysiology, 24(4), 375-425.
• Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The Neural Basis of Mentalizing. Neuron, 50(4), 531-534.
• Shadlen, M. N., & Movshon, J. A. (1999). Motion Perception: Seeing and Doing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(22), 12497-12502.
• Vaitl, D. (1996). The Hidden Observer: A Review of the Divided-Consciousness View of Hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 39(2), 103-113.