Your Part 2 Of The Literature Review
Your Part 2 Of The Lit Review Review Of The Literature W 8pleas
Your Part 2 of the Lit. Review (Review of the Literature)! (W. 8) Please write part 2 of your literature review. You will be essentially cutting and pasting your objective summaries under Level II and Level III headings (see page 13 of the Foundations Manual and the sample paper in this week's folder). Put them in an order that makes sense given how you compare and contrast them using your who, when, where, why, how, and what excel homework sheet. Use your transition compare and contrast words (similar to...etc). When you use these words, please be sure to say somewhere how they are similar, different, etc.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
The second part of the literature review focuses on synthesizing and organizing existing research by summarizing key studies under specific thematic levels (Level II and Level III). The goal is to critically compare and contrast these studies, highlighting their similarities, differences, and contributions to the field. This process aids in establishing a comprehensive understanding of the current state of research relevant to the topic and identifies gaps that may need further exploration.
Organization and Approach
The literature should be arranged according to the thematic or conceptual framework suggested by the research questions—specifically, utilizing the categories of "who," "when," "where," "why," "how," and "what" as outlined in the Excel homework sheet. Each summary must begin with an objective overview of the study, clearly noting the authors, year of publication, and the context.
Transition words such as "similarly," "in contrast," "on the other hand," "comparable to," and "differing from" should be employed to articulate the relationships among the studies. These transitions serve to illuminate patterns, divergences, and overlaps, thus fostering critical analysis rather than mere description.
Content Development
Begin by presenting summaries under Level II headings, maintaining clarity on the overarching themes. For example, if discussing methodologies, summarize how different studies approach data collection, noting similarities in qualitative or quantitative methods. Under each summary, explicitly state how the studies relate to each other—whether they complement, contradict, or build upon one another.
Following the Level II summaries, proceed to Level III, often providing more detailed analyses of individual studies or sub-themes. Here, comparisons should deepen, discussing why certain approaches or findings might differ—is it due to variations in sample populations ("who"), timing ("when"), locations ("where"), theoretical frameworks ("why"), procedures ("how"), or findings ("what").
Throughout this section, maintain journalistic objectivity, and aim for coherence and logical progression. Use transition phrases to guide the reader through the comparison and contrast, ensuring that each paragraph flows smoothly from the previous one.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this section synthesizes the current body of literature by systematically comparing and contrasting relevant studies under thematic headings. This analytical process lays a solid foundation for identifying research gaps and developing a balanced, evidence-based argument in the subsequent sections of the literature review.
References
- Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year). Title of the study. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
- Author, C. C., Author, D. D., & Author, E. E. (Year). Title of the study. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
- Author, F. F. (Year). Title of the book. Publisher.
- Author, G. G., & Author, H. H. (Year). Title of the article. Conference Name/Journal Name. https://doi.org/xxxxx
- Author, I. I. (Year). Title of the report. Organization/Institution.