Your Personal Moral Theory Assignment Required Resources Rea

Your Personal Moral Theoryassignmentrequired Resourcesreadreview The

Your Personal Moral Theory Assignment Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapter 13 Lesson Narrated PowerPoint Tutorial Links to an external site. (Make sure to review this tutorial before you begin recording.) Introduction In this session, you have been considering moral-ethical dilemmas you yourself faced or that you know of that you either resolved or failed to resolve, but hopefully learned from. You may never have given much thought to ethical theory nor what ethical premises/paradigms you have unconsciously held. You will be focusing on this case for this assignment: Jane Doe is a nursing student at University X. Jane is in week eight of a course entitled: "Introduction to Ethics".

For the week one discussion, Jane copied work done by her friend John Doe in the same class two months ago (with a different professor). John told Jane it was okay to use his work as John's professor never checked any work in the class using Turnitin.com. John claimed to have earned an A on the work also. In week two, Jane went to StudentPapering.com and paid ten dollars for a week two essay done by a student (not John Doe) who took the same course four months ago. StudentPapering promises that all its archived work is of excellent quality and cannot be detected as copied.

Jane then uploaded an exact copy of the work for the week two assignment. In week three, Jane paid a worker at PaperingStudent.com ten dollars to write for Jane a brand new essay after Jane shared with the worker the essay assignment instructions. In week four, Jane relied on her knowledge of Esperanto. She felt pressed for time and found an article by a professor from Esperanto on the week four topic. She translated Esperanto into English using Moogle Translate, and the translated text served as her week four paper.

In week five, Jane was running late again. Jane purposely uploaded a blank paper hoping that she would later claim it was an innocent mistake and not be assessed a late penalty. In a previous course on History, she had done the same (with an earlier paper from the History class rather than simply a blank) and had not seen any late penalty assessed. In week six, Jane took work she did in a nursing course from a year ago and submitted that for her discussion posting in her current class. She simply copied and pasted the work she had labored intensively on a year ago (even though University X forbids this practice as 'self-plagiarism').

Jane was confident her Nursing instructor never checked that work using Turnitin.com or another method. In week seven, Jane copied and pasted work found on website.com for the paper. Jane did not use any quotation marks or other documentation to show the text was not by Jane. Since Jane's Ethics professor did not check papers and posting for any issues by using Turnitin.com or another method, the professor graded all of Jane's work unaware of Jane's actions throughout the weeks of the class. Jane feels her actions are morally justified both because her economic situation requires her to work too much to devote time to school (although other students are well-off enough to have such time) and her religion forbids cheating, but Jane ignores her religion's teachings.

Instructions Now that you have had an opportunity to explore ethics formally, create a reflective assessment of your learning experience and the collaborations you engaged in throughout this session. You will submit both of the following: A written reflection An oral presentation using a PowerPoint narrated slide show. For the written reflection, address Jane Doe's and respond to the following: Articulate again your moral theory from week eight discussion (You can revise it if you wish). What two ethical theories best apply to it? Why those two? Apply to Jane Doe's case your personal moral philosophy as developed in week eight discussion and now. Use it to determine if what Jane Doe did was ethical or unethical per your own moral philosophy. Consider if some of these examples are more grave instances of ethical transgressions than others. Explain. Propose a course of social action and a solution by using the ethics of egoism, utilitarianism, the "veil of ignorance" method, deontological principles, and/or a theory of justice to deal with students like Jane. Consider social values such as those concerning ways of life while appraising the interests of diverse populations (for instance, those of differing religions and economic status). For the oral presentation, briefly summarize your feelings about taking a course in Ethics and explore your process of transformation in this course. Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings, and where you are now. Consider your interaction in discussions. Should health care workers be required to take a course in Ethics? Why or why not. Requirements Writing Requirements Length: 3-4 pages (not including title page or references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources) Presentation Requirements Length: 2-3 minutes

Paper For Above instruction

This assignment invites a reflective examination of moral philosophy, applied ethically to a complex case involving academic dishonesty. It encourages integrating theoretical knowledge with personal moral reasoning to evaluate ethical conduct and propose solutions rooted in philosophical principles while contemplating social values.

Introduction

Throughout this course, I have developed a nuanced understanding of ethical theories and how they influence moral decision-making. My initial moral theory emphasized Kantian deontology, which prioritizes duty and adherence to moral rules, and Utilitarianism, which considers the greatest good for the greatest number. These frameworks have shaped my approach to evaluating moral dilemmas, encouraging a balance between respecting individual rights and promoting overall well-being.

Identifying Ethical Theories

Kantian deontology and Utilitarianism are the two ethical theories most aligned with my moral philosophy. Kantian ethics emphasizes treating individuals as ends and adhering to universal moral duties, such as honesty and integrity. Utilitarianism, on the other hand, evaluates actions based on their consequences for societal welfare, often justifying sacrifices for the greater good when appropriate. Both theories offer valuable perspectives: Kant’s focus on moral duty ensures steadfast adherence to principles, while utilitarianism considers broader societal impacts.

Applying Personal Moral Philosophy to Jane Doe's Case

Applying my moral philosophy to Jane Doe’s case, I believe her actions are ethically problematic overall. From a Kantian perspective, her repeated dishonesty—copying work, submitting translated and plagiarized content, and falsifying attendance—violate fundamental duties of honesty and integrity. These acts undermine respect for herself, her instructors, and academic standards, which are essential moral duties in education and professional contexts. Utilitarian principles also suggest that such behavior, although potentially seen as beneficial for Jane in alleviating her workload, ultimately erodes trust within academic institutions and can harm the broader community of students and educators.

Some actions are more severe—such as outright plagiarism and submitting work not authored by Jane—because they breach core moral duties of truthfulness more directly. Less grave acts, like attempting to evade penalties by submitting blank papers, do reflect a disregard for rules but may be motivated by time pressure and economic hardship. Nonetheless, all these acts compromise the fairness and integrity of the educational process.

Proposed Course of Social Action and Solutions

Using the ethics of egoism, one might argue that Jane’s primary moral obligation is to serve her own interests—securing her education and future—potentially justifying her actions if they lead to personal success. However, from a utilitarian viewpoint, policies should aim to maximize societal trust and fairness. Implementing strict honor codes, enhancing detection tools like Turnitin, and providing support for financially strained students can help address these issues.

Applying the veil of ignorance, policies should be constructed impartially, considering perspectives of diverse students of various socioeconomic backgrounds and religious beliefs. These policies should promote equitable treatment, emphasizing the importance of honesty and fairness for everyone, regardless of personal circumstances.

Considering Social Values

Valuing diverse ways of life necessitates respecting different cultural and religious backgrounds. While some students may justify certain behaviors based on economic hardship or religious beliefs, educational institutions must uphold ethical standards that foster fairness and integrity. Balancing respect for individual circumstances with the need to maintain academic standards requires nuanced policies that support vulnerable populations without compromising core ethical principles.

Conclusion

In sum, my personal moral philosophy, rooted in Kantian deontology and utilitarianism, condemns dishonest behaviors like those exhibited by Jane Doe. Addressing academic dishonesty requires a combination of strict policies, ethical education, and support mechanisms that recognize diverse social backgrounds. Promoting integrity is essential for preserving the trustworthiness of educational and healthcare systems, especially when future healthcare workers are involved.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
• Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
• Ross, W. D. (1930). The Right and the Good. Oxford University Press.
• Shaw, W. H. (2016). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.