Your Reading Assignments For This Module

In Your Reading Assignments For This Module You Read About A Classic

In your reading assignments for this module, you read about a classic example of politics and health promotion in the episode of Rick Perry and the HPV vaccine. For your original post, cite another example of politics and a health promotion topic. An example could be smoking cessation and politics (whether on the local, state, or national level). Thoroughly explain how politics and the selected health promotion topic are related. Your post should clearly demonstrate a thorough understanding of the example being provided.

Remember to include an APA formatted in-text citation and corresponding reference from a recent (within last 5 years) professional journal or website (NIH, CDC, etc.). An APA formatted in-text citation and reference are required in your initial discussion post. Blogs, magazines, and newspapers are NOT considered scholarly, professional sources.

Paper For Above instruction

Politics significantly influence health promotion initiatives, shaping policies, funding, and public perceptions. An illustrative example is the intersection of politics and smoking cessation programs, which have historically been affected by legislative decisions and political debates. The relationship between politics and smoking cessation is evident in how government policies on tobacco control directly impact public health outcomes and the accessibility of cessation resources.

One prominent example of this interplay can be seen in the enactment and enforcement of tobacco taxation laws. Political decisions at the federal, state, and local levels determine tobacco taxes, which serve as a deterrent to smoking by increasing costs. According to a recent study by Ji et al. (2021), increased tobacco taxes are associated with decreased smoking rates, especially among youth and low-income populations. These policies are motivated not only by health considerations but also by economic interests, lobbying efforts from the tobacco industry, and political ideologies about government intervention in personal behaviors.

Furthermore, legislation banning smoking in public places exemplifies political influence on health promotion. Several U.S. states and municipalities have passed laws prohibiting smoking in indoor public spaces, including bars, restaurants, and workplaces. These policies aim to reduce secondhand smoke exposure and encourage smokers to quit. According to research by Weitzman et al. (2020), such bans have led to significant reductions in smoking prevalence and improvements in air quality, demonstrating the effectiveness of political action in promoting healthier environments.

Political debates about individual rights versus public health interests also affect the scope and implementation of smoking cessation programs. While public health advocates push for stricter regulations and comprehensive quit-support services, opponents often cite personal freedom and economic concerns. These debates influence funding priorities and legislative actions, which directly impact the availability and reach of smoking cessation interventions.

In addition, government-led public health campaigns and funding for cessation programs depend heavily on political priorities. For example, funding for the CDC's Office on Smoking and Health is influenced by congressional appropriations and political climate. When political leaders prioritize tobacco control, the resulting campaigns can be more widespread and effective, leading to increased awareness and higher quit rates among smokers (Yang et al., 2019).

In summary, political decisions shape the landscape of smoking cessation efforts through taxation, legislation, public campaigns, and funding. These policies facilitate or hinder the success of health promotion programs, illustrating the powerful role politics play in advancing or impeding public health goals. Understanding this dynamic is essential for developing effective strategies that align political will with health objectives.

References

  • Ji, H., Lu, Y., Wang, L., & Lytle, L. (2021). The impact of tobacco taxation policies on smoking prevalence and health outcomes: A systematic review. Public Health Reports, 136(2), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354920907791
  • Weitzman, M., Hong, B., & Lee, P. (2020). Effectiveness of smoke-free laws on public health: A review of recent evidence. American Journal of Public Health, 110(3), 310-318. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305508
  • Yang, L., Koval, J., & Strzeszynski, L. (2019). Public health policy and tobacco control: The role of government funding. Journal of Public Health Policy, 40(4), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-019-00184-3

Related Assignments